• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌 CT 增强扫描与 MRI 评估大体肿瘤靶区及其对调强放疗计划一致性指数和剂量体积参数的影响。

Evaluation of gross target volumes in CECT vs MRI in head and neck cancer and its implication on concordance indices and dose-volume parameters of IMRT treatment plan.

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Jul 1;20(5):1533-1538. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_246_23. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

DOI:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_246_23
PMID:39412917
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) for head and neck cancers (HNCs) is based on contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT), soft tissue contrasts are better evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We therefore evaluated dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters along with concordance index (ConI), conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) of planning target volume (PTV) of GTV delineated on CECT vs MRI in HNCs enrolled for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODOLOGY

Forty consecutive HNCs were enrolled in this study. All underwent CECT and MRI simulations with immobilization devices. GTVp and GTVn were delineated independently on CECT and MRI images. Corresponding MRI volumes were then copied to CECT. IMRT plans were generated on the CECT incorporating PTV margins. DVH parameters of PTVpn for both CECT and MRI were compared. In addition, mean (±SD) percentage difference of GTVp, GTVn, GTVpn, ConI, CI, and HI were evaluated using paired t-test.

RESULTS

The GTVp (P = 0.005), GTVn (P = 0.009), and GTVpn (P < 0.001) delineated on MRI were found to be significantly larger than GTV delineated on CECT. In eight patients, GTV outlined on CECT were larger than MRI. Significant mean differences in CECT vs MRI of CI (P < 0.001), HI (P < 0.001), ConI (P < 0.001), and DVH parameters (D2, D95, D98, V95, and V100 all P < 0.001; D50: P = 0.009) were noted.

CONCLUSION

The GTVs and corresponding PTVs were significantly larger on MRI compared to CECT. This resulted in significant differences in DVH parameters, CI, ConI, and HI. This could be improved by co-registered MRI-CECT volumes during routine IMRT treatment planning for HNCs.

摘要

背景

虽然头颈部癌症(HNC)的放射治疗计划(RTP)基于对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT),但磁共振成像(MRI)上软组织对比度更好。因此,我们评估了在接受调强放疗(IMRT)的 HNC 中,基于 CECT 与 MRI 勾画 GTV 所得到的计划靶区(PTV)的剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数,以及一致性指数(ConI)、适形指数(CI)和均匀性指数(HI)。

方法

本研究纳入了 40 例连续的 HNC 患者。所有患者均接受了带有固定装置的 CECT 和 MRI 模拟检查。GTVp 和 GTVn 分别在 CECT 和 MRI 图像上独立勾画。然后将相应的 MRI 体积复制到 CECT 上。在 CECT 上生成包含 PTV 边界的 IMRT 计划。比较了 CECT 和 MRI 上 PTVpn 的 DVH 参数。此外,还使用配对 t 检验评估了 GTVp、GTVn、GTVpn、ConI、CI 和 HI 的平均(±SD)百分比差异。

结果

MRI 上勾画的 GTVp(P=0.005)、GTVn(P=0.009)和 GTVpn(P<0.001)明显大于 CECT 上勾画的 GTV。在 8 例患者中,CECT 上勾画的 GTV 大于 MRI。在 CECT 与 MRI 之间,CI(P<0.001)、HI(P<0.001)、ConI(P<0.001)和 DVH 参数(D2、D95、D98、V95 和 V100 均 P<0.001;D50:P=0.009)存在显著的平均差异。

结论

与 CECT 相比,MRI 上的 GTV 及其相应的 PTV 明显更大。这导致了 DVH 参数、CI、ConI 和 HI 的显著差异。在常规的 HNC 调强放疗计划中,通过对 CECT 和 MRI 进行配准,可以改善这些差异。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of gross target volumes in CECT vs MRI in head and neck cancer and its implication on concordance indices and dose-volume parameters of IMRT treatment plan.头颈部癌 CT 增强扫描与 MRI 评估大体肿瘤靶区及其对调强放疗计划一致性指数和剂量体积参数的影响。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Jul 1;20(5):1533-1538. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_246_23. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
2
Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.基于磁共振直线加速器的调强放射治疗(IMRT)与传统容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)前列腺癌治疗计划的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jul 21;16(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01858-7.
3
Variability of gross tumour volume delineation: MRI and CT based tumour and lymph node delineation for lung radiotherapy.大体肿瘤体积勾画的可变性:用于肺放疗的 MRI 和 CT 肿瘤及淋巴结勾画。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.036. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
[18FDG] PET-CT-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment planning of head and neck cancer.基于[18FDG]正电子发射断层显像/X线计算机体层成像(PET-CT)的头颈部癌调强放射治疗计划
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Sep 1;69(1):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.053.
5
Simultaneous 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI for IMRT treatment planning for meningioma: first experience.68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRI 同期融合成像在脑膜瘤调强放疗计划中的初步应用
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Sep 1;81(1):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.078. Epub 2011 Feb 6.
6
Evaluation of fixed-jaw IMRT and tangential partial-VMAT radiotherapy plans for synchronous bilateral breast cancer irradiation based on a dosimetric study.基于剂量学研究的固定架调强放疗和切线部分容积旋转调强放疗计划在双侧同期乳腺癌放疗中的评价。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Sep;20(9):31-41. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12688. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
7
Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.回顾性研究比较了前列腺治疗的 MR 引导放射治疗 (MRgRT) 摆位策略:复位与重新计划。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 6;14(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1349-2.
8
Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques.垂体腺瘤治疗的放射疗法:三种计划技术的剂量学比较。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jul-Aug;25(4):586-593. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
The impact of positron emission tomography on primary tumour delineation and dosimetric outcome in intensity modulated radiotherapy of early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.正电子发射断层扫描对早期T分期鼻咽癌调强放射治疗中肿瘤原发灶勾画及剂量学结果的影响
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Aug 24;11(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0685-8.
10
Hurdles in radiation planning for glioblastoma: Can delayed-contrast enhanced computed tomography be a potential solution?胶质母细胞瘤放射治疗计划中的障碍:延迟对比增强计算机断层扫描能否成为一种潜在的解决方案?
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct;15(5):e103-e108. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13111. Epub 2019 Jan 30.