School of Physical Education, Chizhou University, Chizhou, China.
Sports Health Promotion Center, Chizhou University, Chizhou, China.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0308483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308483. eCollection 2024.
Research to date has not provided a clear understanding of how different grades and majors affect the physical fitness of college students. It is postulated that there are significant disparities in physical health among college students of different grades and majors. The purpose of this study was to evidence these health disparities and to engage in an extensive analysis and discussion thereof.
A sample of 8,772 (2,404 boys and 6,368 girls) Chinese college students from freshman to junior years, aged 17-22, including 12 different majors in four colleges, were recruited in Jiangxi Province. All seven physical fitness indicators (body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity, 50-m dash, standing long jump, sit and reach, upper body muscle strength, and endurance runs) were conducted for all participants. One-way ANOVA and LSD tests were conducted to compare the physical fitness scores of different grades in the same major. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare the differences in every physical fitness indicator for different majors. Pearson's correlations among 12 majors for every grade were conducted to study the significant corrections between the two physical fitness indicators. The body mass index (BMI) and physical fitness indicator (PFI) for college students of different grade were investigated using a nonlinear regression model.
The current state of physical fitness among college students is concerning, as the majority of students were barely passing (with a passing rate of 75.3%). Specifically, junior students exhibited lower scores than freshman and sophomore students across all 12 majors. From freshman to junior year, majors of music (78.01±4.58), English (79.29±5.03), and education (76.26±4.81) had the highest scores, respectively, but major art consistently scored the lowest, which were 73.85±6.02, 74.97±5.53, and 72.59±4.84, respectively. Pairwise comparisons revealed more significant differences in individual physical fitness indicators among the three grades in humanities than in sciences. Pearson's correlations showed significant correlations among seven physical fitness indicators in all three grades. PFI had a parabolic trend with BMI both for boy and girl college students in Jiangxi province.
The physical fitness indicators of college students in Jiangxi province significantly differed in grades and majors, showing undesirable phenomena. The physical fitness of senior and humanities major college students was much weaker and needs sufficient attention. The relationship between BMI and PFI presented an inverted "U"-shaped change characteristic. Continued nationwide interventions are needed to promote physical activity and other healthy lifestyle behaviors in China.
迄今为止的研究尚未清楚地了解不同年级和专业如何影响大学生的身体素质。据推测,不同年级和专业的大学生在身体健康方面存在显著差异。本研究的目的是证明这些健康差异,并对此进行广泛的分析和讨论。
在江西省,我们招募了来自四个学院的 12 个不同专业的 8772 名(2404 名男生和 6368 名女生)大一至大三的中国大学生,年龄为 17-22 岁。对所有参与者进行了 7 项身体素质指标(体重指数(BMI)、肺活量、50 米短跑、立定跳远、坐立前伸、上肢肌肉力量和耐力跑)的检测。采用单因素方差分析和 LSD 检验比较同一专业不同年级的身体素质得分。采用独立样本 t 检验比较不同专业的各项身体素质指标的差异。对每个年级的 12 个专业进行 Pearson 相关性分析,研究两个身体素质指标之间的显著相关性。采用非线性回归模型研究不同年级大学生的 BMI 和身体素质指标(PFI)。
大学生目前的身体素质状况令人担忧,大多数学生勉强及格(及格率为 75.3%)。具体来说,各专业的大三学生得分均低于大一和大二学生。从大一到大二,音乐专业(78.01±4.58)、英语专业(79.29±5.03)和教育专业(76.26±4.81)的得分最高,而艺术专业的得分始终最低,分别为 73.85±6.02、74.97±5.53 和 72.59±4.84。两两比较显示,人文科学各年级之间的个别身体素质指标差异更为显著。Pearson 相关性分析显示,所有三个年级的 7 项身体素质指标之间均存在显著相关性。在江西,男女生的 BMI 与 PFI 呈抛物线趋势。
江西省大学生的身体素质指标在年级和专业上存在显著差异,呈现出不理想的现象。高年级和人文专业大学生的身体素质较弱,需要足够的关注。BMI 和 PFI 之间的关系呈现出倒“U”形变化特征。需要在全国范围内持续开展干预措施,促进中国的身体活动和其他健康生活方式行为。