• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多模态血管超声参数和临床危险因素的易损斑块预测模型的构建。

Construction of vulnerable plaque prediction model based on multimodal vascular ultrasound parameters and clinical risk factors.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 20# Chazhong Road, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, National Regional Medical Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75375-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-75375-4
PMID:39414918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484977/
Abstract

The rupture of vulnerable plaque (VP) are significant pathogenic factors leading to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. This study aims to construct a vulnerable plaque prediction model (VPPM) by combining multimodal vascular ultrasound parameters and clinical risk factors, and to validate it. A total of 196 atherosclerotic patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from January 2017 to December 2023 were collected and divided into a modeling group (n = 137) and a validation group (n = 59). Clinical information including: hypertension, diabetes, smoking history, and body mass index (BMI) was included in the analysis. All patients underwent carotid ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examination after admission, with main ultrasound parameters including thickness, echogenicity types, stenosis degree, and CEUS neovascularization grading of plaques. Independent risk factors for VP in CEA patients were screened through binary Logistic regression analysis, and a prediction model was established along with a nomogram. The calibration curve, receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to assess the calibration, diagnostic efficacy, and clinical utility of the VPPM model. There were no significant statistical differences in multimodal vascular ultrasound parameters and clinical risk factors between the modeling and validation groups (P > 0.05). Binary Logistic regression analysis identified plaque thickness, echo type, CEUS neovascularization grading, BMI, and smoking history as 5 variables entering the prediction model. The VPPM model showed good diagnostic efficacy, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.959 (95% CI 0.915-0.999). Using the nomogram with a VPPM risk assessment score of 135.42 as the diagnostic cutoff value in the modeling group, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and Youden index were 88.1%, 94.1%, 14.98, 0.126, and 82.2%, respectively. In the DCA curve, the VPPM model curve was significantly better than two extreme lines, indicating good clinical utility. The VPPM model constructed by integrating multimodal ultrasound parameters and clinical key risk factors has high diagnostic efficacy and is expected to be an auxiliary tool for clinical diagnosis of vulnerable plaques.

摘要

易损斑块的破裂是导致心脑血管疾病的重要致病因素。本研究旨在通过结合多模态血管超声参数和临床危险因素构建易损斑块预测模型(VPPM),并对其进行验证。

收集了 2017 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间因颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)而住院的 196 例动脉粥样硬化患者,将其分为建模组(n=137)和验证组(n=59)。分析包括高血压、糖尿病、吸烟史和体重指数(BMI)等临床信息。所有患者入院后均行颈动脉超声和超声造影(CEUS)检查,主要超声参数包括斑块厚度、回声类型、狭窄程度和 CEUS 新生血管分级。通过二元 Logistic 回归分析筛选出 CEA 患者易损斑块的独立危险因素,并建立预测模型及列线图。采用校准曲线、受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估 VPPM 模型的校准、诊断效能和临床实用性。建模组和验证组之间的多模态血管超声参数和临床危险因素无统计学差异(P>0.05)。二元 Logistic 回归分析确定斑块厚度、回声类型、CEUS 新生血管分级、BMI 和吸烟史为进入预测模型的 5 个变量。VPPM 模型显示出良好的诊断效能,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.959(95%CI 0.915-0.999)。在建模组中,使用 VPPM 风险评估评分 135.42 的列线图作为诊断截断值,灵敏度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和约登指数分别为 88.1%、94.1%、14.98、0.126 和 82.2%。在 DCA 曲线中,VPPM 模型曲线明显优于两条极端线,表明具有良好的临床实用性。该模型通过整合多模态超声参数和临床关键危险因素,具有较高的诊断效能,有望成为易损斑块临床诊断的辅助工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/b27691e39f31/41598_2024_75375_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/319591fd2b3a/41598_2024_75375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/ba38b498b705/41598_2024_75375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/dfa707ff7832/41598_2024_75375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/f0ca6c6570d5/41598_2024_75375_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/a2cf659ad7c1/41598_2024_75375_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/b27691e39f31/41598_2024_75375_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/319591fd2b3a/41598_2024_75375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/ba38b498b705/41598_2024_75375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/dfa707ff7832/41598_2024_75375_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/f0ca6c6570d5/41598_2024_75375_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/a2cf659ad7c1/41598_2024_75375_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17ea/11484977/b27691e39f31/41598_2024_75375_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Construction of vulnerable plaque prediction model based on multimodal vascular ultrasound parameters and clinical risk factors.基于多模态血管超声参数和临床危险因素的易损斑块预测模型的构建。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24255. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75375-4.
2
Correlation of Clinical and Ultrasound Variables to Vulnerability of Carotid Plaques in Patients Submitted to Carotid Endarterectomy.接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的临床及超声变量与颈动脉斑块易损性的相关性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:213-222. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
The Value of Multimodal Ultrasonic Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Carotid Vulnerable Plaque: A Comparative Study With Pathology.多模态超声评分系统在颈动脉易损斑块诊断中的价值:与病理学的对比研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Sep;42(9):2135-2142. doi: 10.1002/jum.16238. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
4
Advanced ultrasound methods in assessment of carotid plaque instability: a prospective multimodal study.颈动脉斑块不稳定性评估的高级超声方法:一项前瞻性多模态研究。
BMC Neurol. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-1620-z.
5
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined With 2D Strain Imaging and Histopathological Multimodal Assessment of Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.对比增强超声联合二维应变成像及组织病理学对颈动脉斑块易损性的多模态评估
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Jul;49(7):1595-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Multimodal ultrasound parameters aided carotid plaque risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.多模态超声参数辅助无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉斑块危险分层。
Acta Radiol. 2022 Feb;63(2):278-286. doi: 10.1177/0284185121989189. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Correlation of enhancement degree on contrast-enhanced ultrasound with histopathology of carotid plaques and serum high sensitive C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的超声造影增强程度与颈动脉斑块组织病理学及血清高敏C反应蛋白水平的相关性
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017 Jun;37(3):425-428. doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1751-7. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
8
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.当代颈动脉成像:从狭窄程度到斑块易损性
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Utility of Complementary Magnetic Resonance Plaque Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Detect Carotid Vulnerable Plaques.补充磁共振斑块成像和对比增强超声检测颈动脉易损斑块的效用。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011302.
10
Plaque Elasticity and Intraplaque Neovascularisation on Carotid Artery Ultrasound: A Comparative Histological Study.颈动脉超声斑块弹性和斑块内新生血管化:一项对比组织学研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Sep;62(3):358-366. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Echogenicity of carotid plaques as a predictor of regression following lipid-lowering therapy.颈动脉斑块的回声性作为降脂治疗后斑块消退的预测指标。
Thromb J. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00753-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Adipokines, adiposity, and atherosclerosis.脂联素、肥胖与动脉粥样硬化。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022 May 3;79(5):272. doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04286-2.
2
Management of atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery stenosis.动脉粥样硬化性颅外颈动脉狭窄的管理。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Mar;21(3):273-283. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00359-8.
3
Carotid intraplaque neovascularisation as a predictive factor for future vascular events in patients with mild and moderate carotid stenosis: an observational prospective study.颈动脉斑块内新生血管形成作为轻中度颈动脉狭窄患者未来血管事件的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Jun 19;14:17562864211023992. doi: 10.1177/17562864211023992. eCollection 2021.
4
Search for Reliable Circulating Biomarkers to Predict Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.寻找可靠的循环生物标志物预测颈动脉斑块易损性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 3;21(21):8236. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218236.
5
The Diabetes Mellitus-Atherosclerosis Connection: The Role of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation.糖尿病与动脉粥样硬化的关联:脂质和葡萄糖代谢及慢性炎症的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 6;21(5):1835. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051835.
6
Correlation between risk factors of cerebrovascular disease and calcified plaque characteristics in patients with atherosclerotic severe carotid stenosis.动脉粥样硬化性重度颈动脉狭窄患者脑血管病危险因素与钙化斑块特征的相关性
Neurol Res. 2020 Jan;42(1):83-89. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2019.1710403. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
From Detecting the Vulnerable Plaque to Managing the Vulnerable Patient: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.从检测易损斑块到管理易损患者:JACC 最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 24;74(12):1582-1593. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.062.
8
Risk Factors for Recurrent Carotid-Artery Stenosis Following Stenting Treatment.支架治疗后颈动脉再狭窄的危险因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Apr 3;25:2429-2434. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913894.
9
Ultrasound assessment of carotid arteries: Current concepts, methodologies, diagnostic criteria, and technological advancements.颈动脉的超声评估:当前概念、方法、诊断标准及技术进展。
Echocardiography. 2018 Dec;35(12):2079-2091. doi: 10.1111/echo.14197.
10
Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Pharmacologic Treatments on Carotid Intraplaque Neovascularization Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.心血管危险因素和药物治疗对超声造影检测颈动脉斑块内新生血管的影响。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jan;32(1):113-120.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 16.