Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stockholm South General Hospital (Södersjukhuset), Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Stockholm South General Hospital (Södersjukhuset), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 16;14(1):24231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76433-7.
Cesarean section for breech presentation is often recommended. However, cesarean section affects future reproduction. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of the first birth in breech on outcomes of the second birth and the two births together. This is a register-based nationwide cohort study including 23 062 women with a first singleton birth in breech ≥ 34 gestational weeks and a subsequent singleton birth in Sweden 2000-2019. Exposure was mode of first delivery. Main maternal outcome was a composite of fourth-degree perineal injury, postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or death. Main infant outcome was a composite of stillbirth, extremely preterm birth (< 28 weeks), moderate to severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, or death. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. In the first birth, the infant composite outcome affected < 1% in both groups but the risk was higher in the vaginal breech group (13/1525), compared with the breech CS group (27/21 537), aOR 7.06, 95% CI 2.91-17.1. In the second birth, the infant composite outcome affected < 1% in both groups but the risk was lower for the first vaginal breech group (3/1525) compared with the first breech CS group (152/21 537), aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.84. There was no significant difference between the groups in risk of composite infant outcome in the two births assessed together, or in risk of composite maternal outcome. In total, the chance of a two-children family without maternal or infant severe adverse composite outcome was high and similar regardless mode of the breech first birth.
剖宫产术常用于臀位分娩。然而,剖宫产术会影响未来的生殖能力。本研究旨在评估第一胎臀位分娩方式对第二胎分娩结局及两次分娩结局的影响。这是一项基于注册的全国性队列研究,纳入了 2000 年至 2019 年在瑞典首次单胎臀位妊娠且妊娠≥34 周,随后单胎阴道分娩的 23062 名女性。暴露因素为第一产式。主要产妇结局为 4 度会阴裂伤、需要输血的产后出血、子宫切除或死亡的复合结局。主要婴儿结局为死产、极早产儿(<28 周)、中重度缺氧缺血性脑病、治疗性低温或死亡的复合结局。使用多变量逻辑回归分析结局。在第一胎分娩中,两组复合婴儿结局的发生率均<1%,但阴道分娩组(13/1525)的风险高于剖宫产组(27/21537),比值比(OR)为 7.06,95%置信区间(CI)为 2.91-17.1。在第二胎分娩中,两组复合婴儿结局的发生率均<1%,但阴道分娩组(3/1525)的风险低于剖宫产组(152/21537),OR 为 0.26,95%CI 为 0.08-0.84。两组两次分娩复合婴儿结局风险或复合产妇结局风险均无显著差异。总的来说,两次妊娠且母婴均无严重不良复合结局的两孩家庭的机会较高,且无论第一胎臀位分娩方式如何,其机会均相似。