Suppr超能文献

急性心力衰竭住院期间的心房颤动消融:脉冲场消融的可行性及作用

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation During Hospitalization for Acute Heart Failure: Feasibility and Role of Pulsed Field Ablation.

作者信息

Marek Josef, Stojadinović Predrag, Wichterle Dan, Peichl Petr, Hašková Jana, Borišincová Eva, Štiavnický Petr, Čihák Robert, Šramko Marek, Kautzner Josef

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.

2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Charles University Medical School I, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;36(1):256-265. doi: 10.1111/jce.16507. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause or aggravate heart failure (HF). Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for AF. This study focused on the feasibility and outcomes of emergent AF ablation performed during hospitalization for acute HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent emergent CA for AF during hospitalization for acute HF in 2018-2024. Arrhythmia recurrence was the primary endpoint. The combination of arrhythmia recurrence, HF hospitalization, and all-cause death was the secondary endpoint. Patients were censored 1 year after the index procedure. We included 46 patients, 35% females, with median age of 67 [interquartile rage: 61, 72] years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25 [23, 28]%. Thermal CA was performed in 14 patients, and pulsed field ablation (PFA) in 32 patients. Procedure time was significantly shorter with PFA compared to thermal CA (77 [57, 91] vs. 166 [142, 200] minutes, p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy time was longer with PFA (9.5 [7.6, 12.0] vs. 3.9 [2.9, 6.0] minutes, p < 0.001), with a borderline trend towards higher radiation dose (75 [53, 170] vs. 50 [30, 94] μGy.m, p = 0.056). Extrapulmonary ablation was frequent (86% and 84% for thermal CA and PFA, p > 0.9). The estimated freedom from the primary endpoint was 79% after PFA and 64% after thermal CA (p = 0.44). The estimated freedom from the secondary endpoint was 76% after PFA and 57% after thermal CA (p = 0.43). LVEF improved by 24% ± 2% (p < 0.001) in patients with the first manifestation of HF and by 14% ± 4% (p = .004) in patients with decompensated HF diagnosed earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent CA of AF during acute HF hospitalization is safe and associated with improved LVEF and good clinical outcomes. In the PFA era, the rate of these procedures is progressively increasing as they are readily available and easy to perform compared to thermal ablation.

摘要

引言

心房颤动(AF)可导致或加重心力衰竭(HF)。导管消融(CA)是治疗AF的有效方法。本研究聚焦于急性HF住院期间进行紧急AF消融的可行性和结果。

方法与结果

我们回顾性调查了2018年至2024年因急性HF住院期间接受紧急CA治疗AF的患者。心律失常复发是主要终点。心律失常复发、HF住院和全因死亡的综合情况是次要终点。在首次手术后1年对患者进行随访。我们纳入了46例患者,其中35%为女性,中位年龄为67岁[四分位间距:61, 72岁],左心室射血分数(LVEF)为25%[23, 28%]。14例患者接受了热消融CA,32例患者接受了脉冲场消融(PFA)。与热消融CA相比,PFA的手术时间显著更短(77[57, 91]分钟对166[142, 200]分钟,p < 0.001)。PFA的透视时间更长(9.5[7.6, 12.0]分钟对3.9[2.9, 6.0]分钟,p < 0.001),辐射剂量有更高的临界趋势(75[53, 170]μGy.m对50[30, 94]μGy.m,p = 0.056)。肺外消融很常见(热消融CA和PFA分别为86%和84%,p > 0.9)。PFA后主要终点的估计无事件生存率为79%,热消融CA后为64%(p = 0.44)。PFA后次要终点的估计无事件生存率为76%,热消融CA后为57%(p = 0.43)。首次出现HF的患者LVEF改善了24%±2%(p < 0.001),早期诊断为失代偿性HF的患者LVEF改善了14%±4%(p = 0.004)。

结论

急性HF住院期间紧急进行AF消融是安全的,且与LVEF改善和良好的临床结果相关。在PFA时代,与热消融相比,这些手术的发生率逐渐增加,因为它们容易获得且易于实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a16/11727001/447c114fd7e4/JCE-36-256-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验