Suppr超能文献

比较两种阅读干预措施对患有诵读困难症的三至五年级讲波斯语学生阅读成果的有效性:一项探索性研究。

Comparing the Effectiveness of Two Kinds of Reading Interventions on Reading Outcomes in Third to Fifth Grade Farsi Speaker Students with Dyslexia: An Exploratory Study.

作者信息

Mazaheri Samira, Soleymani Zahra, F Hudson Roxanne, Talebian Saeed

机构信息

Collage of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Collage of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 8;38:77. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.77. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This research marks the exploration into comparing the effectiveness of two reading interventions in improving reading outcomes for third to fifth-grade Farsi-speaking students with dyslexia.

METHODS

In this randomized control trial study, twenty students in Tehran were randomly assigned to a multi-component group and a comprehension-based intervention group, each receiving 36 sessions of 45 minutes. The effectiveness of the interventions was evaluated using adjusted mean differences with a one-way ANCOVA.

RESULTS

The results revealed the comprehension-based intervention's superior effect size across most outcomes, except for the letters string. The effect size was large for word reading 0.93 (CI -0.002 to 1.85), medium for phoneme deletion 0.67 (CI -0.23 to 1.5), small for text comprehension 0.25 (CI -0.62 to 1.13), and trivial for both rhyme identification 0.1 (-0.77 to 0.98) and non-word reading 0.11 (CI -0.76 to 0.98). The multi-component intervention had a greater effect size on letters string than the other intervention, although it was small -0.21 (CI -1.09 to 0.66).

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that comprehension-based intervention was more effective for Farsi-speaking students with dyslexia in grades 3-5, emphasizing the need for diverse intervention approaches to address their specific needs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探索比较两种阅读干预措施对患有诵读困难症的三至五年级说波斯语学生阅读成绩提升效果。

方法

在这项随机对照试验研究中,德黑兰的20名学生被随机分配到多成分组和基于理解的干预组,每组接受36节时长45分钟的课程。采用单因素协方差分析的调整均值差异评估干预措施的效果。

结果

结果显示,除字母串外,基于理解的干预措施在大多数结果上的效应量更大。单词阅读的效应量较大,为0.93(置信区间-0.002至1.85);音素删除的效应量为中等,为0.67(置信区间-0.23至1.5);文本理解的效应量较小,为0.25(置信区间-0.62至1.13);韵脚识别和非单词阅读的效应量均微不足道,分别为0.1(置信区间-0.77至0.98)和0.11(置信区间-0.76至0.98)。多成分干预措施对字母串的效应量比另一种干预措施更大,尽管效应量较小,为-0.21(置信区间-1.09至0.66)。

结论

该研究得出结论,基于理解的干预措施对三至五年级患有诵读困难症的说波斯语学生更有效,强调需要采用多样化的干预方法来满足他们的特定需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a464/11480675/e43935b4d20d/mjiri-38-77-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验