Snowling Margaret J, Hulme Charles, Nation Kate
Department of Experimental Psychology and St John's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxf Rev Educ. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):501-513. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756.
Dyslexia is a difficulty in learning to decode (read aloud) and to spell. DSM5 classifies dyslexia as one form of neurodevelopmental disorder. Neurodevelopmental disorders are heritable, life-long conditions with early onset. For many years, research on dyslexia proceeded on the basis that it was a specific learning difficulty - specific meaning that the difficulty could not be explained in terms of obvious causes such as sensory problems or general learning difficulties (low IQ). However, the failure to find qualitative differences in reading, and phonological skills, between children with dyslexia and children with more general learning problems led this kind of 'discrepancy' definition to fall from favour. The Rose Review stated that dyslexia can occur across the IQ range and that poor decoding skills require the same kinds of intervention irrespective of IQ. In this paper, we argue that loosening the criteria for dyslexia has influenced common understanding of the condition and led to diagnostic confusion. In the longer term, the use of the term may need to change. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
阅读障碍是一种在学习解码(大声朗读)和拼写方面存在的困难。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版将阅读障碍归类为神经发育障碍的一种形式。神经发育障碍是具有遗传性的终身疾病,起病较早。多年来,关于阅读障碍的研究是基于这样一种观点进行的,即它是一种特定的学习困难——特定意味着这种困难无法用诸如感官问题或一般学习困难(低智商)等明显原因来解释。然而,在阅读障碍儿童与有更普遍学习问题的儿童之间,未能发现阅读及语音技能方面的质性差异,导致这种“差异”定义不再受青睐。罗斯审查指出,阅读障碍可发生在整个智商范围内,而且无论智商如何,较差的解码技能都需要同样类型的干预。在本文中,我们认为放宽阅读障碍的标准影响了对该病症的普遍理解,并导致了诊断上的混乱。从长远来看,该术语的使用可能需要改变。本文还讨论了对研究和实践的影响。