Suppr超能文献

定义与理解诵读困难症:过去、现在与未来

Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future.

作者信息

Snowling Margaret J, Hulme Charles, Nation Kate

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology and St John's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Oxf Rev Educ. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):501-513. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756.

Abstract

Dyslexia is a difficulty in learning to decode (read aloud) and to spell. DSM5 classifies dyslexia as one form of neurodevelopmental disorder. Neurodevelopmental disorders are heritable, life-long conditions with early onset. For many years, research on dyslexia proceeded on the basis that it was a specific learning difficulty - specific meaning that the difficulty could not be explained in terms of obvious causes such as sensory problems or general learning difficulties (low IQ). However, the failure to find qualitative differences in reading, and phonological skills, between children with dyslexia and children with more general learning problems led this kind of 'discrepancy' definition to fall from favour. The Rose Review stated that dyslexia can occur across the IQ range and that poor decoding skills require the same kinds of intervention irrespective of IQ. In this paper, we argue that loosening the criteria for dyslexia has influenced common understanding of the condition and led to diagnostic confusion. In the longer term, the use of the term may need to change. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

摘要

阅读障碍是一种在学习解码(大声朗读)和拼写方面存在的困难。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版将阅读障碍归类为神经发育障碍的一种形式。神经发育障碍是具有遗传性的终身疾病,起病较早。多年来,关于阅读障碍的研究是基于这样一种观点进行的,即它是一种特定的学习困难——特定意味着这种困难无法用诸如感官问题或一般学习困难(低智商)等明显原因来解释。然而,在阅读障碍儿童与有更普遍学习问题的儿童之间,未能发现阅读及语音技能方面的质性差异,导致这种“差异”定义不再受青睐。罗斯审查指出,阅读障碍可发生在整个智商范围内,而且无论智商如何,较差的解码技能都需要同样类型的干预。在本文中,我们认为放宽阅读障碍的标准影响了对该病症的普遍理解,并导致了诊断上的混乱。从长远来看,该术语的使用可能需要改变。本文还讨论了对研究和实践的影响。

相似文献

1
Defining and understanding dyslexia: past, present and future.
Oxf Rev Educ. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):501-513. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756.
2
Do we really need a new definition of dyslexia? A commentary.
Ann Dyslexia. 2024 Oct;74(3):355-362. doi: 10.1007/s11881-024-00305-y. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Reading disorders and dyslexia.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016 Dec;28(6):731-735. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000411.
4
Annual research review: the nature and classification of reading disorders--a commentary on proposals for DSM-5.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):593-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02495.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
5
A few words about dyslexia.
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2009 Oct;26(4):62.
6
A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;36(3):399-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01298.x.
7
Intelligence and dyslexia: implications for diagnosis and intervention.
Scand J Psychol. 1999 Jun;40(2):127-34. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00109.
8
An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Dec;25(10):618-29. doi: 10.1177/002221949202501001.
9
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):2-40. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.
10
Phonological processing skills in children with speech sound disorder: A multiple case study approach.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):15-27. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12764. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

4
Validity of the Comprehensive Learning Test for Diagnosis of Specific Reading or Mathematical Disorders.
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;36(3):174-181. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.250022.
6
The role of self-compassion in adults with dyslexia.
Ann Dyslexia. 2025 Jul;75(2):339-361. doi: 10.1007/s11881-025-00327-0. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
9
Second Language Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs About Dyslexia: Turkish Context.
Dyslexia. 2025 May;31(2):e70005. doi: 10.1002/dys.70005.
10
Investigating Reading Enjoyment in Adults With Dyslexia.
Dyslexia. 2025 Feb;31(1):e1803. doi: 10.1002/dys.1803.

本文引用的文献

1
Literacy, Advocacy and Agency: The Campaign for Political Recognition of Dyslexia in Britain (1962-1997).
Soc Hist Med. 2019 Mar 30;33(4):1306-1326. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkz030. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Class and classification: the London Word Blind Centre for Dyslexic children, 1962-1972.
Oxf Rev Educ. 2020 Aug 13;46(4):414-428. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2020.1751099.
3
If we don't look, we won't see: Measuring language development to inform literacy instruction.
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Oct;6(2):210-217. doi: 10.1177/2372732219839075. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder: comorbid disorders with distinct effects on reading comprehension.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;61(6):672-680. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13140. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
5
Understanding Dyslexia Through Personalized Large-Scale Computational Models.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):386-395. doi: 10.1177/0956797618823540. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
6
Developmental Outcomes for Children at High Risk of Dyslexia and Children With Developmental Language Disorder.
Child Dev. 2019 Sep;90(5):e548-e564. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13216. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
The association between poor reading and internalising problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Feb;67:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
8
Understanding comorbidity of learning disorders: task-dependent estimates of prevalence.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;60(3):286-294. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12965. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
9
Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2018 Jun;19(1):5-51. doi: 10.1177/1529100618772271.
10
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1068-1080. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12721. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验