Takahashi Naoko, Sawayama Masataka, Chen Xu, Motomura Yuki, Takeichi Hiroshige, Miyauchi Satoru, Hiramatsu Chihiro
Graduate School of Design, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Oct 2;18:1441380. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1441380. eCollection 2024.
Human color vision exhibits significant diversity that cannot be fully explained by categorical classifications. Understanding how individuals with different color vision phenotypes perceive, recognize, and react to the same physical stimuli provides valuable insights into sensory characteristics. This study aimed to identify behavioral and neural differences between different color visions, primarily classified as typical trichromats and anomalous trichromats, in response to two chromatic stimuli, blue-green and red, during an attention-demanding oddball task.
We analyzed the P3 component of event-related potentials (ERPs), associated with attention, and conducted a broad spatiotemporal exploration of neural differences. Behavioral responses were also analyzed to complement neural data. Participants included typical trichromats ( = 13) and anomalous trichromats ( = 5), and the chromatic stimuli were presented in an oddball paradigm.
Typical trichromats exhibited faster potentiation from the occipital to parietal regions in response to the more salient red stimulus, particularly in the area overlapping with the P3 component. In contrast, anomalous trichromats revealed faster potentiation to the expected more salient blue-green stimulus in the occipital to parietal regions, with no other significant neural differences between stimuli. Comparisons between the color vision types showed no significant overall neural differences.
The large variability in red-green sensitivity among anomalous trichromats, along with neural variability not fully explained by this sensitivity, likely contributed to the absence of clear neural distinctions based on color saliency. While reaction times were influenced by red-green sensitivity, neural signals showed ambiguity regarding saliency differences. These findings suggest that factors beyond red-green sensitivity influenced neural activity related to color perception and cognition in minority color vision phenotypes. Further research with larger sample sizes is needed to more comprehensively explore these neural dynamics and their broader implications.
人类的色觉表现出显著的多样性,这种多样性无法通过分类完全解释。了解具有不同色觉表型的个体如何感知、识别和对相同的物理刺激做出反应,能为感官特征提供有价值的见解。本研究旨在确定在一项需要注意力的oddball任务中,不同色觉(主要分为典型三色视者和异常三色视者)对两种颜色刺激(蓝绿色和红色)的行为和神经差异。
我们分析了与注意力相关的事件相关电位(ERP)的P3成分,并对神经差异进行了广泛的时空探索。还分析了行为反应以补充神经数据。参与者包括典型三色视者(n = 13)和异常三色视者(n = 5),颜色刺激以oddball范式呈现。
典型三色视者对更显著的红色刺激从枕叶到顶叶区域表现出更快的电位增强,特别是在与P3成分重叠的区域。相比之下,异常三色视者在枕叶到顶叶区域对预期更显著的蓝绿色刺激表现出更快的电位增强,不同刺激之间没有其他显著的神经差异。色觉类型之间的比较没有显示出明显的整体神经差异。
异常三色视者红绿色敏感度的巨大变异性,以及这种敏感度无法完全解释的神经变异性,可能导致基于颜色显著性没有明显的神经差异。虽然反应时间受红绿色敏感度影响,但神经信号在显著性差异方面表现出模糊性。这些发现表明,除红绿色敏感度之外的因素影响了少数色觉表型中与颜色感知和认知相关的神经活动。需要更大样本量的进一步研究来更全面地探索这些神经动力学及其更广泛的影响。