Min Jin-Hong, Sarlus Heela, Harris Robert A
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital at Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Oct 2;18:1467333. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1467333. eCollection 2024.
Microbes have been suspected to cause Alzheimer's disease since at least 1908, but this has generally remained unpopular in comparison to the amyloid hypothesis and the dominance of Aβ and Tau. However, evidence has been accumulating to suggest that these earlier theories are but a manifestation of a common cause that can trigger and interact with all the major molecular players recognized in AD. Aβ, Tau and ApoE, in particular appear to be molecules with normal homeostatic functions but also with alternative antimicrobial functions. Their alternative functions confer the non-immune specialized neuron with some innate intracellular defenses that appear to be re-appropriated from their normal functions in times of need. Indeed, signs of infection of the neurons by biofilm-forming microbial colonies, in synergy with herpes viruses, are evident from the clinical and preclinical studies we discuss. Furthermore, we attempt to provide a mechanistic understanding of the AD landscape by discussing the antimicrobial effect of Aβ, Tau and ApoE and Lactoferrin in AD, and a possible mechanistic link with deficiency of vital copper-based systems. In particular, we focus on mitochondrial oxidative respiration via complex 4 and ceruloplasmin for iron homeostasis, and how this is similar and possibly central to neurodegenerative diseases in general. In the case of AD, we provide evidence for the microbial Alzheimer's disease (MAD) theory, namely that AD could in fact be caused by a long-term microbial exposure or even long-term infection of the neurons themselves that results in a costly prolonged antimicrobial response that disrupts copper-based systems that govern neurotransmission, iron homeostasis and respiration. Finally, we discuss potential treatment modalities based on this holistic understanding of AD that incorporates the many separate and seemingly conflicting theories. If the MAD theory is correct, then the reduction of microbial exposure through use of broad antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory treatments could potentially alleviate AD although this requires further clinical investigation.
至少从1908年起,人们就怀疑微生物会引发阿尔茨海默病,但与淀粉样蛋白假说以及Aβ和Tau的主导地位相比,这种观点总体上一直不太受认可。然而,越来越多的证据表明,这些早期理论只是一个共同原因的表现,这个共同原因可以触发并与阿尔茨海默病中所有公认的主要分子参与者相互作用。特别是Aβ、Tau和载脂蛋白E似乎是具有正常稳态功能但也具有替代抗菌功能的分子。它们的替代功能赋予了非免疫特化神经元一些先天性细胞内防御能力,这些防御能力似乎在需要时从其正常功能中重新获得。事实上,从我们讨论的临床和临床前研究中可以明显看出,形成生物膜的微生物菌落与疱疹病毒协同作用感染神经元的迹象。此外,我们试图通过讨论Aβ、Tau、载脂蛋白E和乳铁蛋白在阿尔茨海默病中的抗菌作用,以及与重要铜基系统缺乏可能的机制联系,来提供对阿尔茨海默病情况的机制理解。特别是,我们关注通过复合物4进行的线粒体氧化呼吸和用于铁稳态的铜蓝蛋白,以及这与一般神经退行性疾病的相似性和可能的核心地位。就阿尔茨海默病而言,我们为微生物阿尔茨海默病(MAD)理论提供了证据,即阿尔茨海默病实际上可能是由长期的微生物暴露甚至神经元自身的长期感染引起的,这会导致代价高昂的长期抗菌反应,从而破坏控制神经传递、铁稳态和呼吸的铜基系统。最后,我们基于对阿尔茨海默病的这种整体理解讨论潜在的治疗方式,这种理解包含了许多单独且看似相互矛盾的理论。如果MAD理论正确,那么通过使用广泛的抗菌和抗炎治疗来减少微生物暴露可能会缓解阿尔茨海默病,尽管这需要进一步的临床研究。