Arthur Allignol & Antoine Pinon were employed by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Nov;13(11):e230027. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0027. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
Dependent censoring involves a preferential attrition of a subgroup of interest; occurring in survival analysis, it may impact interpretation by introducing a selection bias. To assess the potential bias in a comparison of bisoprolol to other antihypertensives in terms of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) incidence, inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) was used. It was further used to contextualize results obtained through competing risks analysis. Two estimands were considered to assess T2DM incidence while accounting for deviations from the initial antihypertensive monotherapy (DFM). A hypothetical estimand using IPCW, treating DFM as censoring, was interpreted together with a 'while-on-treatment' estimand, treating DFM as a competing risk. We illustrated our application with a cohort study based on Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) including 267,352 patients with newly diagnosed arterial hypertension between 2000 and 2017, initiating antihypertensive monotherapy among bisoprolol, other beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system drugs (ACEi/ARB), diuretics and calcium-channel blockers. A mild dependent censoring process was hypothesized, leading to slight overestimation of T2DM incidence. Although subject to some limitations, a nonsignificant trend toward an excess of risk associated with ACEi/ARB was yielded consistently by IPCW and competing risks analyses. Conversely, in comparisons of bisoprolol versus either diuretics, other beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers, no significant differences or critical dependent censoring impact were found. Concurrent use of complementary estimands allowed formulating a refined interpretation of our findings: though not significant, the trend toward an excess of T2DM risk associated with a ACEi/ARB monotherapy compared with bisoprolol is likely not originating only from the minor dependent censoring. Reassessing identical estimands in other cohorts would provide insights to corroborate or refute this result.
依赖删失涉及到感兴趣的亚组的优先损耗;在生存分析中,它可能会通过引入选择偏差来影响解释。为了评估在比较比索洛尔和其他抗高血压药物在 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)发生率方面的潜在偏差,使用了逆概率删失权重(IPCW)。它进一步用于将通过竞争风险分析获得的结果置于上下文中。考虑了两种估计量来评估 T2DM 的发生率,同时考虑了初始抗高血压单药治疗的偏差(DFM)。使用 IPCW 的假设估计量将 DFM 视为删失,与“治疗中”估计量一起解释,将 DFM 视为竞争风险。我们使用基于临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)的队列研究来说明我们的应用,该研究包括 2000 年至 2017 年间新诊断为动脉高血压的 267352 名患者,他们开始使用比索洛尔、其他β受体阻滞剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统药物(ACEi/ARB)、利尿剂和钙通道阻滞剂进行抗高血压单药治疗。假设存在轻度依赖删失过程,导致 T2DM 发生率略有高估。尽管存在一些局限性,但 IPCW 和竞争风险分析一致得出与 ACEi/ARB 相关的风险增加呈非显著趋势。相反,在比索洛尔与利尿剂、其他β受体阻滞剂或钙通道阻滞剂的比较中,没有发现显著差异或关键的依赖删失影响。同时使用补充估计量允许对我们的发现进行更精细的解释:尽管不显著,但与比索洛尔相比,ACEi/ARB 单药治疗与 T2DM 风险增加的趋势可能不仅仅源于轻微的依赖删失。在其他队列中重新评估相同的估计量将提供见解来证实或反驳这一结果。