• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有复杂颈部解剖结构的破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复

Endovascular vs open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile neck anatomy.

作者信息

Pitcher Grayson S, Sen Indrani, Newhall Karina S, Stoner Michael C, Mendes Bernardo C, Mix Doran

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.010
PMID:39423934
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aneurysm neck anatomy in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is often complex, limiting the feasibility of endovascular repair (EVAR). The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of rAAAs in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA). The secondary aim was to review the clinical characteristics and anatomic risk factors predictive of mortality.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective review was performed to identify patients with rAAAs and HNA between 2004 and 2021. HNA was defined as infrarenal aortic neck diameter >28 mm, infrarenal neck length <15 mm, or angulation >60 degrees. The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality. Preoperative computed tomography was analyzed using an Aquarius workstation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess variables that influenced survival.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients with rAAAs and HNA underwent infrarenal EVAR or OSR. Overall mean age was 74 ± 10 years, and 72% were male. Eighty-five patients (62%) underwent infrarenal EVAR, and 52 (38%) underwent OSR. Mean aneurysm size at the time of rupture was 86 ± 22 mm. Patients who underwent OSR were more likely to present with a higher Garland preoperative risk score (P = .05), have a lower pH (P < .001), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .001), and higher lactate (P = .005). Patients with an infrarenal neck length <15 mm were more likely to undergo OSR (EVAR 64% vs OSR 87%; P = .004), and patients with an infrarenal neck angle >60 degrees were more likely to undergo EVAR (60% vs 39%; P = .01). EVAR was associated with lower 30-day (17% vs 27%; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.2; P = .14) and 90-day (22% vs 33%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.2; P = .17) all-cause mortality; however, this was not statistically significant. The overall median follow-up time was 19 months (range, 2-66 months). One-year survival for EVAR and OSR were 75% and 64% (log-rank P = .14), and 5-year survival for EVAR and OSR were 65% and 55% (log-rank P = .28). Hemoglobin (P = .009), increasing calcification score (P = .002), and infrarenal neck length <10 mm (P = .01) were associated with all-cause mortality at 30 days for EVAR on multivariate Cox regression analysis. Lactate (P < .001) was the only variable associated with all-cause mortality at 30 days for OSR on multivariate Cox analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and long-term survival favored EVAR in comparison to OSR in patients with rAAAs and HNA; however, this was not statistically significant. Calcification of the infrarenal neck and neck length <10 mm were associated with increased 30-day mortality for EVAR, whereas no anatomic variables were specifically associated with 30-day mortality for OSR.

摘要

目的

破裂性腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)的瘤颈解剖结构通常较为复杂,限制了血管腔内修复术(EVAR)的可行性。本研究的目的是比较血管腔内修复术(EVAR)和开放手术修复术(OSR)治疗瘤颈解剖结构复杂(HNA)的rAAA患者的疗效。次要目的是回顾预测死亡率的临床特征和解剖学危险因素。

方法

进行一项多中心回顾性研究,以确定2004年至2021年间患有rAAA和HNA的患者。HNA定义为肾下腹主动脉瘤颈直径>28mm、肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<15mm或成角>60度。主要终点是30天全因死亡率。次要终点包括90天、1年和5年死亡率。使用水瓶座工作站分析术前计算机断层扫描。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率,并使用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归分析评估影响生存的变量。

结果

共有137例患有rAAA和HNA的患者接受了肾下EVAR或OSR。总体平均年龄为74±10岁,72%为男性。85例(62%)患者接受了肾下EVAR,52例(38%)患者接受了OSR。破裂时动脉瘤的平均大小为86±22mm。接受OSR的患者更有可能具有较高的术前Garland风险评分(P = 0.05)、较低的pH值(P < 0.001)、较低的收缩压(P < 0.001)和较高的乳酸水平(P = 0.005)。肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<15mm的患者更有可能接受OSR(EVAR为64%,OSR为87%;P = 0.004),肾下腹主动脉瘤颈角度>60度的患者更有可能接受EVAR(60%对39%;P = 0.01)。EVAR与较低的30天(17%对27%;优势比[OR],0.6;95%置信区间[CI],0.3 - 1.2;P = 0.14)和90天(22%对33%;风险比[HR],0.6;95%CI,0.3 - 1.2;P = 0.17)全因死亡率相关;然而,这在统计学上并不显著。总体中位随访时间为19个月(范围,2 - 66个月)。EVAR和OSR的1年生存率分别为75%和64%(对数秩检验P = 0.14),5年生存率分别为65%和55%(对数秩检验P = 0.28)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,血红蛋白(P = 0.009)、钙化评分增加(P = 0.002)和肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<10mm(P = 0.01)与EVAR术后30天全因死亡率相关。多因素Cox分析显示,乳酸水平(P < 0.001)是OSR术后30天全因死亡率的唯一相关变量。

结论

与OSR相比,rAAA和HNA患者接受EVAR的早期和长期生存率更高;然而,这在统计学上并不显著。肾下腹主动脉瘤颈钙化和颈长度<10mm与EVAR术后30天死亡率增加相关,而对于OSR,没有特定的解剖学变量与30天死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Endovascular vs open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile neck anatomy.伴有复杂颈部解剖结构的破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
One-Year Outcomes after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair: Is Endovascular Aortic Repair the Best Choice? A Single-Center Experience.腹主动脉瘤破裂修复术后一年的结果:血管内主动脉修复是最佳选择吗?单中心经验。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;53:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a Chinese Population.中国人群中破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复对比
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Hostile Aortic Neck Anatomy.具有不良主动脉颈部解剖结构的破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;50(3):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
Endovascular repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with lower 30-day mortality and better 5-year survival rates than open surgical repair.血管内修复破裂的肾下腹部主动脉瘤与开放手术修复相比,30 天死亡率较低,5 年生存率更高。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
Population-based long-term outcomes of open versus endovascular aortic repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.基于人群的开放手术与血管内修复治疗破裂腹主动脉瘤的长期结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):1867-1878.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.212. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Anatomic suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair.破裂性腹主动脉瘤行血管腔内修复术的解剖学适宜性。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;22(6):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
8
Comparison of midterm results of endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured and elective abdominal aortic aneurysms.破裂性和择期性腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术的中期结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1554-1563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.091. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Comparative predictors of mortality for endovascular and open repair of ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.破裂性肾下腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复的死亡率比较预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 May;25(4):461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.12.030.
10
Transition from Open Repair to Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Rupture Aortic Aneurysms throughout a 16-Year Period of Time in a Single Tertiary Center.在一家三级中心,16 年间破裂型主动脉瘤的治疗从开放修复向血管内修复转变。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;100:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.023. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A commentary on "Comparison of percutaneous versus cutdown access in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a randomized controlled trial (SWEET-EVAR trial)".关于“血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后经皮入路与切开入路的比较:一项随机对照试验(SWEET-EVAR试验)”的述评
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6555-6556. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002696. Epub 2025 Jun 12.