Suppr超能文献

伴有复杂颈部解剖结构的破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复

Endovascular vs open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile neck anatomy.

作者信息

Pitcher Grayson S, Sen Indrani, Newhall Karina S, Stoner Michael C, Mendes Bernardo C, Mix Doran

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Aneurysm neck anatomy in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is often complex, limiting the feasibility of endovascular repair (EVAR). The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of EVAR and open surgical repair (OSR) for treatment of rAAAs in patients with hostile neck anatomy (HNA). The secondary aim was to review the clinical characteristics and anatomic risk factors predictive of mortality.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective review was performed to identify patients with rAAAs and HNA between 2004 and 2021. HNA was defined as infrarenal aortic neck diameter >28 mm, infrarenal neck length <15 mm, or angulation >60 degrees. The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality. Preoperative computed tomography was analyzed using an Aquarius workstation. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess variables that influenced survival.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients with rAAAs and HNA underwent infrarenal EVAR or OSR. Overall mean age was 74 ± 10 years, and 72% were male. Eighty-five patients (62%) underwent infrarenal EVAR, and 52 (38%) underwent OSR. Mean aneurysm size at the time of rupture was 86 ± 22 mm. Patients who underwent OSR were more likely to present with a higher Garland preoperative risk score (P = .05), have a lower pH (P < .001), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .001), and higher lactate (P = .005). Patients with an infrarenal neck length <15 mm were more likely to undergo OSR (EVAR 64% vs OSR 87%; P = .004), and patients with an infrarenal neck angle >60 degrees were more likely to undergo EVAR (60% vs 39%; P = .01). EVAR was associated with lower 30-day (17% vs 27%; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.2; P = .14) and 90-day (22% vs 33%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.2; P = .17) all-cause mortality; however, this was not statistically significant. The overall median follow-up time was 19 months (range, 2-66 months). One-year survival for EVAR and OSR were 75% and 64% (log-rank P = .14), and 5-year survival for EVAR and OSR were 65% and 55% (log-rank P = .28). Hemoglobin (P = .009), increasing calcification score (P = .002), and infrarenal neck length <10 mm (P = .01) were associated with all-cause mortality at 30 days for EVAR on multivariate Cox regression analysis. Lactate (P < .001) was the only variable associated with all-cause mortality at 30 days for OSR on multivariate Cox analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Early and long-term survival favored EVAR in comparison to OSR in patients with rAAAs and HNA; however, this was not statistically significant. Calcification of the infrarenal neck and neck length <10 mm were associated with increased 30-day mortality for EVAR, whereas no anatomic variables were specifically associated with 30-day mortality for OSR.

摘要

目的

破裂性腹主动脉瘤(rAAA)的瘤颈解剖结构通常较为复杂,限制了血管腔内修复术(EVAR)的可行性。本研究的目的是比较血管腔内修复术(EVAR)和开放手术修复术(OSR)治疗瘤颈解剖结构复杂(HNA)的rAAA患者的疗效。次要目的是回顾预测死亡率的临床特征和解剖学危险因素。

方法

进行一项多中心回顾性研究,以确定2004年至2021年间患有rAAA和HNA的患者。HNA定义为肾下腹主动脉瘤颈直径>28mm、肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<15mm或成角>60度。主要终点是30天全因死亡率。次要终点包括90天、1年和5年死亡率。使用水瓶座工作站分析术前计算机断层扫描。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率,并使用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归分析评估影响生存的变量。

结果

共有137例患有rAAA和HNA的患者接受了肾下EVAR或OSR。总体平均年龄为74±10岁,72%为男性。85例(62%)患者接受了肾下EVAR,52例(38%)患者接受了OSR。破裂时动脉瘤的平均大小为86±22mm。接受OSR的患者更有可能具有较高的术前Garland风险评分(P = 0.05)、较低的pH值(P < 0.001)、较低的收缩压(P < 0.001)和较高的乳酸水平(P = 0.005)。肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<15mm的患者更有可能接受OSR(EVAR为64%,OSR为87%;P = 0.004),肾下腹主动脉瘤颈角度>60度的患者更有可能接受EVAR(60%对39%;P = 0.01)。EVAR与较低的30天(17%对27%;优势比[OR],0.6;95%置信区间[CI],0.3 - 1.2;P = 0.14)和90天(22%对33%;风险比[HR],0.6;95%CI,0.3 - 1.2;P = 0.17)全因死亡率相关;然而,这在统计学上并不显著。总体中位随访时间为19个月(范围,2 - 66个月)。EVAR和OSR的1年生存率分别为75%和64%(对数秩检验P = 0.14),5年生存率分别为65%和55%(对数秩检验P = 0.28)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,血红蛋白(P = 0.009)、钙化评分增加(P = 0.002)和肾下腹主动脉瘤颈长度<10mm(P = 0.01)与EVAR术后30天全因死亡率相关。多因素Cox分析显示,乳酸水平(P < 0.001)是OSR术后30天全因死亡率的唯一相关变量。

结论

与OSR相比,rAAA和HNA患者接受EVAR的早期和长期生存率更高;然而,这在统计学上并不显著。肾下腹主动脉瘤颈钙化和颈长度<10mm与EVAR术后30天死亡率增加相关,而对于OSR,没有特定的解剖学变量与30天死亡率相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验