• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A commentary on "Comparison of percutaneous versus cutdown access in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a randomized controlled trial (SWEET-EVAR trial)".

作者信息

Longbi Liu, Wang Zhen, Li Yuemeng

机构信息

Central Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, People's Republic of China.

Dalian Medical University, Dalian, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6555-6556. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002696. Epub 2025 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002696
PMID:40503777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430755/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A commentary on "Comparison of percutaneous versus cutdown access in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a randomized controlled trial (SWEET-EVAR trial)".关于“血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后经皮入路与切开入路的比较：一项随机对照试验（SWEET-EVAR试验）”的述评
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6555-6556. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002696. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Comparison of percutaneous versus cutdown access in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a randomized controlled trial (SWEET-EVAR trial).血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后患者经皮穿刺与切开入路的比较：一项随机对照试验（SWEET-EVAR试验）
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2535-2545. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002233.
3
The effect of percutaneouS vs. cutdoWn accEss in patients after Endovascular aorTic repair (SWEET): Study protocol for a single-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial.血管腔内主动脉修复术后经皮穿刺与切开入路的效果比较（SWEET）：一项单盲、单中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 19;9:966251. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966251. eCollection 2022.
4
Totally percutaneous versus standard femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.完全经皮入路与标准股动脉入路用于择期分叉腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 27(2):CD010185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub2.
5
Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.经皮完全穿刺与手术切开股动脉入路用于择期分叉型腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 21;2(2):CD010185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub3.
6
Preoperative risk score for access site failure in ultrasound-guided percutaneous aortic procedures.超声引导经皮主动脉介入治疗中入路失败的术前风险评分。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1254-1262.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.025. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Endovascular Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.腹主动脉瘤开放手术与血管内治疗的长期结果：基于重构事件发生时间数据的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Oct 19:15266028231204805. doi: 10.1177/15266028231204805.
8
Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.经皮与外科切开股动脉入路在择期分叉腹主动脉血管内修复术中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 11;1(1):CD010185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub4.
9
Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Young.青年腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放修复对比的系统评价及Meta分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Apr;32(2):276-289. doi: 10.1177/15266028231179419. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
10
Is endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms associated with improved in-hospital mortality compared with surgical repair?与外科修复相比，破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复是否与降低院内死亡率相关？
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;20(1):135-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu329. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of percutaneous versus cutdown access in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a randomized controlled trial (SWEET-EVAR trial).血管腔内腹主动脉修复术后患者经皮穿刺与切开入路的比较：一项随机对照试验（SWEET-EVAR试验）
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2535-2545. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002233.
2
Endovascular vs open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms with hostile neck anatomy.伴有复杂颈部解剖结构的破裂腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复与开放修复
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):590-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.10.010. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
An International Expert-Based CONsensus on Indications and Techniques for aoRtic balloOn occLusion in the Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (CONTROL-RAAA).关于腹主动脉瘤破裂治疗中主动脉球囊阻断的适应症和技术的基于国际专家的共识（CONTROL-RAAA）
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Dec 7:15266028231217233. doi: 10.1177/15266028231217233.
4
Totally percutaneous versus surgical cut-down femoral artery access for elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair.经皮与外科切开股动脉入路在择期分叉腹主动脉血管内修复术中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 11;1(1):CD010185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010185.pub4.
5
Comparison of percutaneous versus open femoral cutdown access for endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.经皮穿刺与开放股动脉切开入路用于破裂腹主动脉瘤血管腔内修复的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1364-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.431.