• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估个体工作绩效问卷(IWPQ)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

Assessing the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) for its validity and reliability.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Gülhane Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2
PMID:39425233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11490085/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ).

METHODS

A total of 340 adult participants who had been working for at least 8 h a day completed the study questionnaire online. The questionnaire consisted of sections on demographics and socioeconomic characteristics, the IWPQ, and the ultrashortened version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3). Principal component analysis (PCA) with Promax rotation was conducted to assess the e three-factor structure for the Turkish version of the IWPQ. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the IWPQ and UWES-3 scales to evaluate convergent validity.

RESULTS

The three factors accounted for a total variance ratio of 60.7%. Cronbach's alphas of three subscales (task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive work behavior) were 0.894, 0.875, and 0.796, respectively. Test-retest reliability showed high agreement, with ICCs of 0.96, 0.98, and 0.91 for the respective scales. There was a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the task performance subscale (ρ = 0.367 and p < 0.001), a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the contextual performance subscale (ρ = 0.403 and p < 0.001), and a statistically significant correlation between UWES-3 and the CWB subscale (ρ=-0.352 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) identifies work performance.The Turkish version of the IWPQ scales demonstrated validity and reliability in assessing individual work performance.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估个体工作绩效问卷(IWPQ)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。

方法

共有 340 名每天至少工作 8 小时的成年参与者在线完成了研究问卷。问卷包括人口统计学和社会经济特征、IWPQ 和超短版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-3)。采用 Promax 旋转的主成分分析(PCA)评估了土耳其语 IWPQ 的三因素结构。采用克朗巴赫 α 评估内部一致性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估测试-重测信度。计算 IWPQ 与 UWES-3 量表之间的 Spearman 相关系数,以评估收敛效度。

结果

三个因素占总方差比为 60.7%。三个分量表(任务绩效、情境绩效和反生产工作行为)的克朗巴赫 α 值分别为 0.894、0.875 和 0.796。测试-重测信度显示高度一致,相应量表的 ICC 分别为 0.96、0.98 和 0.91。UWES-3 与任务绩效分量表之间存在显著的统计学相关性(ρ=0.367,p<0.001),UWES-3 与情境绩效分量表之间存在显著的统计学相关性(ρ=0.403,p<0.001),UWES-3 与 CWB 分量表之间存在显著的统计学相关性(ρ=-0.352,p<0.001)。

结论

个体工作绩效问卷(IWPQ)可识别工作绩效。IWPQ 土耳其语版本在评估个体工作绩效方面具有有效性和可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/d81c62b47512/40359_2024_2010_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/4d1f59a703de/40359_2024_2010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/75da3c67fc01/40359_2024_2010_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/d81c62b47512/40359_2024_2010_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/4d1f59a703de/40359_2024_2010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/75da3c67fc01/40359_2024_2010_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a98/11490085/d81c62b47512/40359_2024_2010_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Turkish version of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) for its validity and reliability.评估个体工作绩效问卷(IWPQ)土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 18;12(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02010-2.
2
[Polish adaptation and validation of the (IWPQ)].[《国际工作姿势问卷》的波兰语改编与验证]
Med Pr. 2023 Dec 15;74(5):389-398. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.01419. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation, from Dutch to Swedish language, of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire.《个人工作绩效问卷》从荷兰语到瑞典语的跨文化适应性调整。
Work. 2020;65(1):97-109. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193062.
4
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
5
Validity and reliability of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student Version in Sri Lanka.乌得勒支工作投入量表学生版在斯里兰卡的效度和信度
BMC Res Notes. 2018 May 4;11(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3388-4.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
The Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study.青少年特发性关节炎患者的青少年关节炎生活质量问卷:土耳其语版本、效度和信度研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):1999-2008. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06962-z. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
8
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire.《个人工作绩效问卷》的跨文化适应性研究
Work. 2015;53(3):609-19. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152237.
9
The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Community Integration Measure in patients with chronic stroke.慢性卒中患者社区融合测量土耳其语版本的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(15):3457-3461. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2246368. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
10
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Depression, professional self-efficacy, and job performance as predictors of life satisfaction: the mediating role of work engagement in nurses.抑郁、职业自我效能感和工作绩效对生活满意度的预测作用:护士工作投入的中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;12:1268336. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1268336. eCollection 2024.
2
Structural and Predictive Validity of the Spanish Short Version of Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in Educational Institutions Workers.教育机构工作者的西班牙文短版乌得勒支工作投入量表的结构和预测效度。
Span J Psychol. 2022 Feb 24;25:e10. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2022.6.
3
Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A Psychometric Assessment.
超短版乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-3):心理测量评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;19(2):890. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020890.
4
Meta-analysis and Scientific Mapping of Well-being and Job Performance.幸福与工作绩效的元分析与科学图谱
Span J Psychol. 2020 Oct 27;23:e43. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.40.
5
Cross-cultural adaptation, from Dutch to Swedish language, of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire.《个人工作绩效问卷》从荷兰语到瑞典语的跨文化适应性调整。
Work. 2020;65(1):97-109. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193062.
6
The Vital Worker: Towards Sustainable Performance at Work.《关键劳动者:迈向可持续的工作绩效》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 13;16(6):910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060910.
7
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire.《个人工作绩效问卷》的跨文化适应性研究
Work. 2015;53(3):609-19. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152237.
10
Improving the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire using Rasch analysis.运用拉施分析改进个体工作绩效问卷。
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(2):160-75.