Gunaydin Gurkan, Hazar Kanik Zeynep, Karabicak Gul Oznur, Sozlu Ugur, Pala Omer Osman, Alkan Zeynep Beyza, Basar Selda, Citaker Seyit
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Health Science Faculty, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
Low back pain is among the most common musculoskeletal system disorders. Outcome measures are needed for the measurement of function, to establish a treatment program, and for monitoring the improvement in low back pain. There exist several questionnaires enquiring about function in low back pain. One of these is Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire, whose reliability and validity were previously established. Other than the original version of the questionnaire, only its Persian version exists. The present study aims to investigate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.
The study included 103 patients with low back pain. For reliability assessment of the questionnaire, test-retest and internal consistency analyses were performed. The results of test-retest analysis were assessed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient method. For internal consistency, Cronbach Alpha value was used. Validity analyses of the questionnaire were performed by construct validity. For construct validity, convergent validity was tested. Convergent validity of the questionnaire was calculated via its correlation with suitable subscales of the Short Form-36 and the total score of the Oswestry Disability Index by using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient values for test-retest reliability were found to be in the range of 0.765-0.924, which indicate a sufficient level of test-retest reliability. Cronbach's Alpha value was found to be 0.804 indicating a high internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient between Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire to Short Form-36 and Oswestry Disability Index values were ranged between 0.424 and -0.810, indicating a good correlation.
Considering all these data, it was concluded that the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire is valid and reliable.
腰痛是最常见的肌肉骨骼系统疾病之一。需要有结果测量指标来衡量功能、制定治疗方案以及监测腰痛的改善情况。有几种关于腰痛功能的调查问卷。其中之一是日本骨科协会腰痛评估问卷，其可靠性和有效性先前已得到确立。除了问卷的原始版本外，仅存在波斯语版本。本研究旨在探讨日本骨科协会腰痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应性、可靠性和有效性。
该研究纳入了103例腰痛患者。为评估问卷的可靠性，进行了重测和内部一致性分析。重测分析结果采用组内相关系数法进行评估。对于内部一致性，使用Cronbach Alpha值。问卷的效度分析通过结构效度进行。对于结构效度，测试了收敛效度。通过使用Pearson相关系数，计算问卷与简短健康调查问卷-36的合适子量表以及奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数总分的相关性，来检验问卷的收敛效度。
重测信度的组内相关系数值在0.765 - 0.924范围内，表明重测信度水平足够。Cronbach's Alpha值为0.804，表明内部一致性较高。日本骨科协会腰痛评估问卷与简短健康调查问卷-36和奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数值之间的Pearson相关系数在0.424至 -0.810之间，表明相关性良好。
综合所有这些数据，得出结论：日本骨科协会腰痛评估问卷土耳其语版本是有效且可靠的。
