• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习预测血液透析患者胃肠道出血住院风险

Prediction of gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalization risk in hemodialysis using machine learning.

机构信息

Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, 920 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.

Fresenius Medical Care, Global Medical Office, Bad Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Nephrol. 2024 Oct 19;25(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03809-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03809-2
PMID:39427152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11490046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a clinical challenge in kidney failure. INSPIRE group assessed if machine learning could determine a hemodialysis (HD) patient's 180-day GIB hospitalization risk.

METHODS

An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and logistic regression model were developed using an HD dataset in United States (2017-2020). Patient data was randomly split (50% training, 30% validation, and 20% testing). HD treatments ≤ 180 days before GIB hospitalization were classified as positive observations; others were negative. Models considered 1,303 exposures/covariates. Performance was measured using unseen testing data.

RESULTS

Incidence of 180-day GIB hospitalization was 1.18% in HD population (n = 451,579), and 1.12% in testing dataset (n = 38,853). XGBoost showed area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) = 0.74 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72, 0.76) versus logistic regression showed AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI 0.66, 0.71). Sensitivity and specificity were 65.3% (60.9, 69.7) and 68.0% (67.6, 68.5) for XGBoost versus 68.9% (64.7, 73.0) and 57.0% (56.5, 57.5) for logistic regression, respectively. Associations in exposures were consistent for many factors. Both models showed GIB hospitalization risk was associated with older age, disturbances in anemia/iron indices, recent all-cause hospitalizations, and bone mineral metabolism markers. XGBoost showed high importance on outcome prediction for serum 25 hydroxy (25OH) vitamin D levels, while logistic regression showed high importance for parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can be considered for early detection of GIB event risk in HD. XGBoost outperforms logistic regression, yet both appear suitable. External and prospective validation of these models is needed. Association between bone mineral metabolism markers and GIB events was unexpected and warrants investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This retrospective analysis of real-world data was not a prospective clinical trial and registration is not applicable.

摘要

背景

胃肠道出血(GIB)是肾衰竭患者面临的一项临床挑战。INSPIRE 研究组评估了机器学习是否可以确定血液透析(HD)患者 180 天内 GIB 住院风险。

方法

使用美国 2017-2020 年 HD 数据集,建立极端梯度提升(XGBoost)和逻辑回归模型。患者数据随机分为(50%训练、30%验证和 20%测试)。在 GIB 住院前 HD 治疗<180 天的病例被归类为阳性观察结果,其余为阴性。模型共考虑了 1303 个暴露/协变量。使用未见测试数据来衡量模型性能。

结果

HD 人群中 180 天 GIB 住院率为 1.18%(n=451579),测试数据集为 1.12%(n=38853)。XGBoost 的曲线下接收者操作特征(AUROC)为 0.74(95%置信区间(CI)0.72,0.76),而逻辑回归的 AUROC 为 0.68(95%CI 0.66,0.71)。XGBoost 的灵敏度和特异度分别为 65.3%(60.9,69.7)和 68.0%(67.6,68.5),逻辑回归的灵敏度和特异度分别为 68.9%(64.7,73.0)和 57.0%(56.5,57.5)。对于许多因素,暴露的关联在两个模型中都是一致的。两个模型均显示 GIB 住院风险与年龄较大、贫血/铁指标紊乱、近期全因住院和骨代谢标志物有关。XGBoost 显示血清 25 羟维生素 D 水平对结果预测的重要性较高,而逻辑回归显示甲状旁腺激素(PTH)水平的重要性较高。

结论

机器学习可用于早期检测 HD 患者 GIB 事件风险。XGBoost 优于逻辑回归,但两者似乎都适用。需要对这些模型进行外部和前瞻性验证。骨代谢标志物与 GIB 事件之间的关联出乎意料,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/3ee23b686eae/12882_2024_3809_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/9b6342aa2d0a/12882_2024_3809_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5a9918ef3aea/12882_2024_3809_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/43599fb282f8/12882_2024_3809_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/fe1e4da7859a/12882_2024_3809_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5e288653b11e/12882_2024_3809_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/bf8bc468d064/12882_2024_3809_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5c786cf2ff51/12882_2024_3809_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/3ee23b686eae/12882_2024_3809_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/9b6342aa2d0a/12882_2024_3809_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5a9918ef3aea/12882_2024_3809_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/43599fb282f8/12882_2024_3809_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/fe1e4da7859a/12882_2024_3809_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5e288653b11e/12882_2024_3809_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/bf8bc468d064/12882_2024_3809_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/5c786cf2ff51/12882_2024_3809_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c73a/11490046/3ee23b686eae/12882_2024_3809_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of gastrointestinal bleeding hospitalization risk in hemodialysis using machine learning.利用机器学习预测血液透析患者胃肠道出血住院风险
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Oct 19;25(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03809-2.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Gastrointestinal Bleeds in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Treatment.机器学习方法预测抗血栓治疗患者胃肠道出血的效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10703.
3
Application of machine learning to predict postoperative gastrointestinal bleed in bariatric surgery.机器学习在预测减重手术术后胃肠道出血中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7121-7127. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10156-0. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
4
Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on long-term dialysis.长期透析患者的胃肠道出血
J Nephrol. 2015 Apr;28(2):235-43. doi: 10.1007/s40620-014-0132-6. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
5
[Significance of digestive hemorrhage in patients with chronic renal insufficiency in hemodialysis].[慢性肾功能不全血液透析患者消化出血的意义]
Acta Med Port. 1992 Feb;5(2):71-4.
6
Association of Sevelamer Initiation with Gastrointestinal Bleeding Hospitalization in Individuals Requiring Hemodialysis.在需要血液透析的个体中,司维拉姆起始治疗与胃肠道出血住院的关系。
Am J Nephrol. 2024;55(4):450-462. doi: 10.1159/000538253. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
7
Gastrointestinal bleeding in patients admitted to cardiology: risk factors and a new risk score.心内科住院患者的胃肠道出血:危险因素和新的风险评分。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Jul-Aug;62(4):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
Heparin use in hemodialysis patients following gastrointestinal bleeding.肝素在胃肠道出血后血液透析患者中的应用。
Am J Nephrol. 2014;40(4):300-7. doi: 10.1159/000367901. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Risk score to predict gastrointestinal bleeding after acute ischemic stroke.预测急性缺血性卒中后胃肠道出血的风险评分
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 25;14:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-130.
10
Machine Learning Model for Risk Prediction of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization From Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation Study.基于电子健康记录的社区获得性急性肾损伤住院风险预测的机器学习模型:开发和验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e16903. doi: 10.2196/16903.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Predictive Risk Algorithm for Bleeding in Individuals on Long-term Hemodialysis: An International Prospective Cohort Study (BLEED-HD).长期血液透析患者出血预测风险算法的开发与验证:一项国际前瞻性队列研究(BLEED-HD)
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jun 22;10:20543581231169610. doi: 10.1177/20543581231169610. eCollection 2023.
2
Bleeding Risk Assessment in End-Stage Kidney Disease: Validation of Existing Risk Scores and Evaluation of a Machine Learning-Based Approach.终末期肾病的出血风险评估:现有风险评分的验证及基于机器学习方法的评估
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Aug 29;122(9). doi: 10.1055/a-1754-7551.
3
Lower rates of endoscopy and higher mortality in end-stage renal disease patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: A propensity matched national study.
终末期肾病伴胃肠道出血患者的内镜检查率较低,死亡率较高:一项倾向评分匹配的全国性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;37(3):584-591. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15771. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
The effectiveness of Glasgow-Blatchford Score in early risk assessment of hemodialysis patients.格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分在血液透析患者早期风险评估中的有效性。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;17(3):753-759. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02869-8. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
Cinacalcet and gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients receiving hemodialysis.西那卡塞与血液透析患者的胃肠道出血风险。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):141-148. doi: 10.1002/pds.5337. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
6
ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding.ACG 临床指南:上消化道和溃疡出血。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.
7
Logistic Regression in Medical Research.医学研究中的逻辑回归
Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):365-366. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005247.
8
Bleeding risk of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.血液透析和腹膜透析患者的出血风险。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):170-175. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa216.
9
Artificial intelligence enabled applications in kidney disease.人工智能在肾脏病中的应用。
Semin Dial. 2021 Jan;34(1):5-16. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12915. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
10
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.