Hunkin Hugh, Malvaso Catia G, Chittleborough Catherine R, Gialamas Angela, Montgomerie Alicia, Falster Kathleen, Lynch John, Pilkington Rhiannon M
School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Australia.
School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Australia.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;64(4):427-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.10.008. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
Youth criminal justice systems are under growing pressure to reduce re-offending behavior and to support young people's health and developmental needs. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to synthesise evidence for 2 prominent community-based interventions for delinquent and antisocial behavior, namely, multisystemic therapy (MST) and functional family therapy (FFT).
We searched Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and Social Services Abstracts for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating MST/FFT. Included studies involved participants aged under 18 years; included interventions targeted delinquent/antisocial behavior, but not maltreatment. We estimated effect sizes for 6 primary outcomes, synthesising RCTs comparing MST/FFT to usual care using correlated hierarchical effects meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias and evidence strength using best-practice tools. Given the additional resources needed to implement MST/FFT, we rated evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference rather than a null effect. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021279736.
We included 35 studies for MST (16 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 4,095 participants, 26% female) and 19 studies for FFT (7 RCTs meta-analyzed comprising 1,471 participants, 22% female). MST had a likely clinically important effect on time in out-of-home care, but no clinically important effects on other primary outcomes (delinquency, new offenses/convictions, placement in out-of-home care, substance use), with low-to-moderate evidence strength. FFT demonstrated possible clinically important effects for the number of new offenses/convictions, time in out-of-home care, and substance use, but evidence strength was low.
Contrary to reports in some evidence clearinghouses indicating that MST/FFT are supported by the highest level of evidence strength, there is limited evidence that these interventions are superior to usual care in reducing delinquent and antisocial behavior in adolescence. These findings should be viewed in the context of important methodological differences with prior reviews, including the rating of evidence strength against a minimum clinically important difference.
Delinquent and antisocial behavior by young people imposes high costs on the wellbeing of individuals and the broader community. This systematic review summarized evidence for two prominent community-based interventions for delinquent and antisocial behavior: multisystemic therapy ([MST], 35 studies) and functional family therapy ([FFT], 19 studies). MST led to a reduced time in out-of-home care compared to usual treatment. FFT had larger favorable effects on delinquency, new offenses and convictions, placement in out-of-home care, and substance use, but the quality of the evidence was poor. The authors concluded that there is limited evidence that either MST or FFT are superior to usual care in reducing delinquent and antisocial behavior in adolescence.
The effect of Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy in addressing child and adolescent delinquent and/or antisocial behavior and childhood maltreatment; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=279736.
青少年刑事司法系统在减少再次犯罪行为以及满足年轻人的健康和发展需求方面面临着越来越大的压力。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在综合针对违法和反社会行为的两种著名的社区干预措施的证据,即多系统疗法(MST)和功能家庭疗法(FFT)。
我们检索了Medline、PsycInfo、Scopus、科学网和社会服务摘要数据库,以查找评估MST/FFT的随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验研究。纳入的研究涉及18岁以下的参与者;纳入的干预措施针对违法/反社会行为,但不包括虐待行为。我们估计了6个主要结局的效应量,使用相关分层效应荟萃分析对比较MST/FFT与常规护理的RCT进行了综合分析。我们使用最佳实践工具评估了偏倚风险和证据强度。鉴于实施MST/FFT需要额外的资源,我们根据最小临床重要差异而非零效应来对证据强度进行评级。本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42021279736。
我们纳入了35项关于MST的研究(对16项RCT进行荟萃分析,共4095名参与者,26%为女性)和19项关于FFT的研究(对7项RCT进行荟萃分析,共1471名参与者,22%为女性)。MST对家庭外安置时间可能有临床重要影响,但对其他主要结局(犯罪、新犯罪/定罪、家庭外安置、物质使用)没有临床重要影响,证据强度为低到中等。FFT对新犯罪/定罪数量、家庭外安置时间和物质使用可能有临床重要影响,但证据强度较低。
与一些证据汇总库中的报告表明MST/FFT得到最高水平的证据强度支持相反,在减少青少年违法和反社会行为方面,这些干预措施优于常规护理的证据有限。这些发现应结合与先前综述在重要方法学差异的背景下看待,包括根据最小临床重要差异对证据强度进行评级。
年轻人的违法和反社会行为给个人福祉和更广泛的社区带来了高昂代价。本系统评价总结了针对违法和反社会行为的两种著名社区干预措施的证据:多系统疗法([MST],35项研究)和功能家庭疗法([FFT],19项研究)。与常规治疗相比,MST导致家庭外安置时间减少。FFT对犯罪、新犯罪和定罪、家庭外安置以及物质使用有更大的有利影响,但证据质量较差。作者得出结论,在减少青少年违法和反社会行为方面,MST或FFT优于常规护理的证据有限。
多系统疗法和功能家庭疗法在解决儿童和青少年违法和/或反社会行为以及儿童期虐待方面的效果;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=279736 。