Orji Chijioke, Ojo Charles, Onobun Daniel E, Igbokwe Kenechukwu, Khaliq Farihah, Ononye Reginald
Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, GBR.
Department of Emergency Medicine, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 20;16(9):e69778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69778. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Given the compromised bone quality and altered healing environment, fracture non-union in osteoporotic bones presents a complex challenge in orthopedics. As global populations age, the incidence of osteoporotic fractures rises, leading to increased delayed healing and non-union cases. The pathophysiology underlying non-union in osteoporotic patients involves impaired bone regeneration, reduced osteoblast function, and poor vascularity. Traditional management strategies - ranging from pharmacological interventions like bisphosphonates and teriparatides to surgical approaches such as bone grafting and mechanical fixation - often yield limited success due to the weakened bone structure. Recent advances, however, have introduced novel therapies such as growth factors, stem cell applications, gene therapy, and bioactive scaffolds that offer more targeted and biologically driven solutions. Emerging technologies like three-dimensional printing and nanotechnology further contribute to customized treatment strategies that hold promise for improved outcomes. Diagnostic approaches have also evolved, integrating radiological assessments and biomarkers to identify patients at risk for non-union better. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including the high costs, technical complexities, and the need for more robust clinical evidence. Future directions involve optimizing these innovative treatments, validating their effectiveness in more extensive clinical trials, and integrating personalized medicine approaches to cater to the individual needs of osteoporotic patients. Overall, integrating these emerging therapeutic strategies alongside traditional practices represents a significant shift towards more effective and personalized management of fracture non-union in osteoporotic bones.
鉴于骨质受损和愈合环境改变,骨质疏松性骨骨折不愈合在骨科领域是一项复杂的挑战。随着全球人口老龄化,骨质疏松性骨折的发病率上升,导致延迟愈合和不愈合病例增加。骨质疏松患者骨折不愈合的病理生理学涉及骨再生受损、成骨细胞功能降低和血管生成不良。传统的治疗策略——从双膦酸盐和特立帕肽等药物干预到骨移植和机械固定等手术方法——由于骨结构薄弱,往往效果有限。然而,最近的进展引入了生长因子、干细胞应用、基因治疗和生物活性支架等新型疗法,提供了更具针对性和生物驱动的解决方案。三维打印和纳米技术等新兴技术进一步推动了定制治疗策略的发展,有望改善治疗效果。诊断方法也有所发展,将放射学评估和生物标志物结合起来,以更好地识别有骨折不愈合风险的患者。尽管取得了这些进展,但挑战依然存在,包括高成本、技术复杂性以及对更有力临床证据的需求。未来的方向包括优化这些创新治疗方法,在更广泛的临床试验中验证其有效性,并整合个性化医疗方法以满足骨质疏松患者的个体需求。总体而言,将这些新兴治疗策略与传统方法相结合,代表了朝着更有效、个性化管理骨质疏松性骨骨折不愈合的重大转变。