Vasilev Yuriy A, Panina Olga Yu, Semenov Dmitry S, Akhmad Ekaterina S, Sergunova Kristina A, Kivasev Stanislav A, Petraikin Alexey V
State Budget-Funded Health Care Institution of the City of Moscow "Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Health Care Department", Moscow, the Russian Federation.
Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Oncological Center No. 1 of Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Health Care Department", Moscow, the Russian Federation.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7128-7137. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-604. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Metal structures are a source of artifacts that significantly complicate the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The use of prostate MRI as a preliminary test in men with a suspicion on prostate cancer leads to an increased use of the test. The aim of this study was to solve a clinically significant problem: to ensure the reduction of artifacts from metal hip implants during prostate MRI. Another goal was to evaluate the impact of artifact reduction methods on quantitative measurements.
The prostate gland (PG) phantom model was a cylinder filled with an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone at the concentrations of 40%, 30%, and 20% [central zone (CZ), peripheral zone (PZ), and "lesion", respectively]. Phantom MRI study was conducted on Philips Ingenia 1.5T and Philips Ingenia 3T scanners.
For 1.5 T, the reduction in the influence of artifacts inside region of interest (ROI) was observed, expressed in a decrease in the average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (CZ, PZ, "lesion") for the manual artifact reduction (MAR) and ZOOM (title of software artifact reduction) techniques compared to the standard method. For 3T this effect was not detected. The same ADC results were obtained for Standard and MAR techniques, and increased ADC values for ZOOM. Despite the fact that the spread of ADC values on 3.0T scanners was minimal, there was a significant deviation of ADC values from the reference ones (up to 30.4%). Therefore, it is necessary to use a correction coefficient in the ADC calculation for the 3.0 T device. In the presented clinical case, high-quality tomograms were obtained without any artifacts, despite the presence of two hip replacement devices in the scanning area.
The accurate prostate MRI in the presence of implants is essential for an accurate diagnosis. This approach allows to reduce artifacts from hip implants, to visualize PG and periprostatic tissue in the best way, and to detect malignant and benign changes.
金属结构是伪影的来源,会显著增加磁共振成像(MRI)解释的复杂性。将前列腺MRI用作疑似前列腺癌男性的初步检查会导致该检查的使用增加。本研究的目的是解决一个具有临床意义的问题:确保在前列腺MRI期间减少来自金属髋关节植入物的伪影。另一个目标是评估伪影减少方法对定量测量的影响。
前列腺(PG)体模模型是一个圆柱体,分别填充浓度为40%、30%和20%的聚乙烯吡咯烷酮水溶液[分别为中央区(CZ)、外周区(PZ)和“病变”]。在飞利浦Ingenia 1.5T和飞利浦Ingenia 3T扫描仪上进行体模MRI研究。
对于1.5T,观察到感兴趣区域(ROI)内伪影影响的降低,与标准方法相比,手动减少伪影(MAR)和ZOOM(软件减少伪影的名称)技术的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)(CZ、PZ、“病变”)降低。对于3T,未检测到这种效果。标准技术和MAR技术获得了相同的ADC结果,而ZOOM技术的ADC值增加。尽管3.0T扫描仪上ADC值的分布最小,但ADC值与参考值存在显著偏差(高达30.4%)。因此,对于3.0T设备,在ADC计算中需要使用校正系数。在本临床病例中,尽管扫描区域存在两个髋关节置换装置,但仍获得了无任何伪影的高质量断层图像。
在存在植入物的情况下进行准确的前列腺MRI对于准确诊断至关重要。这种方法可以减少来自髋关节植入物的伪影,以最佳方式显示前列腺和前列腺周围组织,并检测恶性和良性变化。