Kang Su Lim, Kwon Ji Yean, Kim Sung Min
Department of Medical Device and Healthcare, Dongguk University-Seoul (04620) 26, Pil-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Regulatory Science for Bio-health Medical Device, Dongguk University-Seoul (04620) 26, Pil-dong 3-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2024 Sep 24;32(4):101346. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101346. eCollection 2024 Dec 12.
Companion diagnostics are increasing clinical demand globally, regulatory frameworks for clinical validation are strengthening. Post-marketing verification is an important aspect of providing high-quality, personalized treatment to patients because it can ensure long-term safety and effectiveness, while also generating effective risk management and performance evidence. Certain compliance issues related to the requirements for post-marketing clinical trials can potentially impact manufacturers, so it is essential to have a clear understanding of the regulatory process. In this study, we perform an institutional comparison as well as a case analysis by country (U.S. Food & Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, and Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) on the post-marketing safety and effectiveness of companion diagnostics. We collected guidelines and guidance documents published by each regulatory agency and Post-marketing research case analysis examined the data collection items as well as the materials or templates required to be submitted. The results indicate that there are institutional differences in the post-marketing surveillance activities carried out by different regulatory authorities, and the data required may vary accordingly. The findings of this study are expected to provide new insights that can support manufacturers and developers of companion diagnostics in securing evidence regarding post-marketing safety and effectiveness.
伴随诊断在全球范围内的临床需求不断增加,临床验证的监管框架也在不断加强。上市后验证是为患者提供高质量个性化治疗的一个重要方面,因为它可以确保长期安全性和有效性,同时还能生成有效的风险管理和性能证据。与上市后临床试验要求相关的某些合规问题可能会对制造商产生潜在影响,因此清楚了解监管流程至关重要。在本研究中,我们针对伴随诊断的上市后安全性和有效性,按国家(美国食品药品监督管理局、欧洲药品管理局、日本医药品医疗器械综合机构和韩国食品药品安全部)进行了机构比较和案例分析。我们收集了各监管机构发布的指南和指导文件,并通过上市后研究案例分析审查了数据收集项目以及需要提交的材料或模板。结果表明,不同监管机构开展的上市后监测活动存在机构差异,所需数据可能因此有所不同。预计本研究结果将提供新的见解,以支持伴随诊断的制造商和开发者获取有关上市后安全性和有效性的证据。