Villa Muñoz Teresa, Velázquez Saornil Jorge, Sánchez Milá Zacarías, Romero-Morales Carlos, Almazán Polo Jaime, Baraja Vegas Luis, Hugo-Villafañe Jorge, Abuín-Porras Vanesa
Physiotherapy, Universidad Católica de Ávila, Ávila, Spain.
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, Salamanca, España.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Oct 16;10(4):e002043. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002043. eCollection 2024.
Shoulder pain, primarily due to rotator cuff tendinopathy, significantly impacts function and quality of life, with considerable socioeconomic implications. Physiotherapy myofascial trigger point therapy (MPT) is traditionally used, but therapeutic exercise (TE) has gained attention for its potential administrative and implementation benefits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TE compared with MPT in treating shoulder tendinopathies.
A single-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing TE and MPT. Outcome measures included pain intensity with the Numerical Rating Scale, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and range of motion (ROM), assessed before and after 10 treatment sessions. A total number of 72 participants (TE group n=36 age 49.22±15.29/MTP group n=36 age 49.03±19.12) participated in the study.
Participants in both groups were evaluated before treatment and after 10 sessions. A total of 10 sessions were conducted over 5 weeks of intervention.
Both interventions showed improvements in pain intensity and ROM, with no significant differences between the groups in most measures except PPT, where TE demonstrated a greater decrease in pressure-induced pain.
TE could serve as an alternative to manual therapy, offering cost-benefit advantages, especially in administration via telecare and group sessions, highlighting its broader application in physiotherapy.
NCT06241404.
肩部疼痛主要由肩袖肌腱病引起,对功能和生活质量有显著影响,并具有相当大的社会经济影响。传统上使用物理治疗肌筋膜触发点疗法(MPT),但治疗性运动(TE)因其潜在的管理和实施优势而受到关注。本研究的目的是评估TE与MPT相比在治疗肩部肌腱病方面的疗效。
进行了一项单盲随机对照试验,比较TE和MPT。结局指标包括使用数字评定量表的疼痛强度、压痛阈值(PPT)和运动范围(ROM),在10次治疗前后进行评估。共有72名参与者(TE组n = 36,年龄49.22±15.29/MPT组n = 36,年龄49.03±19.12)参与了该研究。
两组参与者在治疗前和10次治疗后进行评估。在5周的干预期间共进行了10次治疗。
两种干预措施均显示疼痛强度和ROM有所改善,除PPT外,大多数指标在两组之间无显著差异,其中TE在压力诱导疼痛方面下降幅度更大。
TE可作为手法治疗的替代方法,具有成本效益优势,特别是在通过远程护理和团体治疗进行管理方面,突出了其在物理治疗中的更广泛应用。
NCT06241404。