Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, African Unity St, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Department of Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1261. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04996-y.
Radiotherapy is a treatment modality used for head and neck cancer patients. It has a negative influence on bonding strength of adhesives. Little information is available about the effect of radiotherapy on bonding strength of adhesives in primary teeth. Therefore, this in vitro study aimed to detect the best adhesive system and ideal time to apply restorations in primary irradiated teeth regarding adhesive shear bond strength.
Dentin samples from primary teeth were randomly assigned to four groups based on restoration application time and radiation exposure, (G1: control, G2: preradiation, G3: 24 h postradiation, and G4: 6 months postradiation) with 20 samples per group. These groups were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the adhesive system used, with 10 samples per subgroup. (1) 3M™ Single Bond Universal Adhesive (SB), (2) 3M AdperSingle Bond 2 (AS). Samples were exposed to gamma radiation from a cobalt-60 machine. One shot of 60 Gy of radiation was delivered. Then samples were subjected to a shear bond strength test. The load was applied until failure and the maximum load was recorded. Numerical data are presented as mean and standard deviation values, then distributed according to Shapiro-Wilk test or Levene's test and analyzed via two-way ANOVA. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical analysis software version 4.4.1 for Windows (Team RC, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, 2023).
Compared with the AS subgroup, the SB subgroup presented significantly greater values (p < 0.001). For SB, there was no significant difference among the G1 and G4 groups (p > 0.001). However, there was a significant difference between G1, G2, and G3 (p < 0.001, P = 0.025, P = 0.265 ns respectively), and G3 presented the lowest values. For AS, there was no significant difference between groups G1 and G4 (p = < 0.001). Compared with the other groups, G3 presented a significant difference (p = 0.265 ns) and the lowest results.
Restorations performed 24 h after radiation had lower bond strength than those performed six months after radiation. Regardless of the adhesive system used, SB performed better than AS in terms of the shear bond strength.
放射治疗是一种用于头颈部癌症患者的治疗方式。它对黏合剂的黏合强度有负面影响。关于放射治疗对乳牙黏合强度的影响,信息有限。因此,这项体外研究旨在检测最佳的黏合系统和在原发性辐射牙中应用修复体的理想时间,以检测黏合剂的剪切结合强度。
根据修复体应用时间和辐射暴露情况,将乳牙的牙本质样本随机分配到四个组(G1:对照组,G2:放射前,G3:放射后 24 小时,G4:放射后 6 个月),每组 20 个样本。这些组根据使用的黏合系统进一步分为 2 个亚组,每个亚组 10 个样本。(1)3M™Single Bond Universal Adhesive(SB),(2)3M AdperSingle Bond 2(AS)。样本用钴-60 机器进行γ射线照射。一次照射 60 Gy 的辐射。然后对样本进行剪切结合强度测试。施加负载直至失效,并记录最大负载。数值数据以平均值和标准差表示,然后根据 Shapiro-Wilk 检验或 Levene 检验进行分布,并通过双因素方差分析进行分析。所有检验的显著性水平均设定为 p < 0.05。统计分析使用 R 统计分析软件版本 4.4.1 for Windows(Team RC,R:用于统计计算的语言和环境。R 基金会用于统计计算,2023 年)。
与 AS 亚组相比,SB 亚组的数值明显更大(p < 0.001)。对于 SB,G1 组和 G4 组之间没有显著差异(p > 0.001)。然而,G1、G2 和 G3 之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001,P = 0.025,P = 0.265 ns 分别),G3 组的数值最低。对于 AS,G1 组和 G4 组之间没有显著差异(p = <0.001)。与其他组相比,G3 组有显著差异(p = 0.265 ns),结果最低。
放射后 24 小时进行修复的黏合强度低于放射后 6 个月进行修复的黏合强度。无论使用哪种黏合系统,SB 在剪切结合强度方面均优于 AS。