The effects of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing physiology, airway protection, and respiratory-swallow pattern in adults: A systematic review.

PURPOSE

The use of noninvasive respiratory support- namely high flow of oxygen delivered via nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) - has been expanding in recent years. The physiologic mechanisms underlying each of these forms of support are generally well understood. In contrast, the effects on the sensorimotor mechanisms of swallowing movements, and of breathing and swallowing coordination ─ critical elements of airway protection and bolus clearance ─ remain unclear. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the existing evidence about the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing mechanics, airway protection, and respiratory-swallowing patterns in adults.

METHODS

Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses) were searched using predetermined terms. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult humans 2) use of noninvasive respiratory support, and 3) assessment of swallowing.

RESULTS

We identified 8727 articles for screening; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies assessed noninvasive respiratory support in healthy adults, and 9 assessed participants with heterogenous respiratory diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), acute respiratory failure, and chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified NIH Quality Assessment Tool. In healthy adults, results demonstrated mixed effects of HFNC and CPAP on measures of swallowing function, airway protection, and respiratory swallowing patterns. Negative effects on respiratory-swallowing patterns were reported with NIV. In adults with heterogeneous respiratory diagnoses, six studies reported that HFNC, CPAP, or nasal NIV improved measures of swallowing and respiratory-swallowing patterns. HFNC has mixed effects on swallowing measures in ICU patients. NIV increased atypical respiratory-swallowing patterns in patients with stable COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to small sample sizes and the wide variation in study designs, the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing, airway protection, and respiratory-swallowing patterns cannot be confidently assessed based on the current evidence. Future studies using standardized, validated, and reproducible methods to assess the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing physiology and airway protection are warranted.