Montgomery Laura R C, Swain Michael, Dario Amabile B, O'Keeffe Mary, Yamato Tie P, Hartvigsen Jan, French Simon, Williams Christopher, Kamper Steve
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2025 Mar 3;59(6):409-422. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2024-108648.
To evaluate whether sedentary behaviour is a risk or prognostic factor for spinal pain in children and adolescents. Specifically, to estimate the (1) direction and strength of the association; (2) risk of spinal pain onset and (3) effect on spinal pain prognosis.
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 23 March 2023.
Reports estimating the effect of sedentary behaviour on spinal pain in young people (≤19 years).
We included 129 reports, 14 were longitudinal (n = 8 433) and 115 were cross-sectional (n > 697 590). We incorporated 86 studies into meta-analyses. (1) From cross-sectional data, we found low certainty evidence of a small positive association between sedentary behaviour and spinal pain (adjusted odds ratio 1.25 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.33), k = 44, n > 92 617). (2) From longitudinal data, we found low certainty evidence of no increased risk for the onset of spinal pain due to sedentary behaviour (adjusted risk ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.35), k = 4, n = 1 292). (3) No studies assessed prognosis.
Cross-sectional data suggest minimally higher odds of spinal pain for children and adolescents who engage in greater sedentary behaviours. However, longitudinal data do not support a causal relationship, indicating that sedentary behaviour does not increase the risk for onset of spinal pain. Due to the low certainty of evidence, these findings must be interpreted with caution. We found no evidence of the effect sedentary behaviour has on spinal pain prognosis in children and adolescents, highlighting a considerable gap in the literature.
评估久坐行为是否为儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛的风险因素或预后因素。具体而言,估计(1)关联的方向和强度;(2)脊柱疼痛发作的风险;(3)对脊柱疼痛预后的影响。
系统评价与荟萃分析。
截至2023年3月23日对MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和科学网进行电子检索。
报告估计久坐行为对年轻人(≤19岁)脊柱疼痛的影响。
我们纳入了129份报告,其中14份为纵向研究(n = 8433),115份为横断面研究(n > 697590)。我们将86项研究纳入荟萃分析。(1)从横断面数据来看,我们发现低确定性证据表明久坐行为与脊柱疼痛之间存在小的正相关(调整后的优势比为1.25(95%置信区间为1.17至1.33),k = 44,n > 92617)。(2)从纵向数据来看,我们发现低确定性证据表明久坐行为不会增加脊柱疼痛发作的风险(调整后的风险比为1.07(95%置信区间为0.84至1.35),k = 4,n = 1292)。(3)没有研究评估预后。
横断面数据表明,久坐行为较多的儿童和青少年患脊柱疼痛的几率略高。然而,纵向数据不支持因果关系,表明久坐行为不会增加脊柱疼痛发作的风险。由于证据的确定性较低,这些发现必须谨慎解释。我们没有发现久坐行为对儿童和青少年脊柱疼痛预后有影响的证据,这凸显了文献中的一个重大空白。