• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进男性参与计划生育:来自菲律宾达沃市无刀输精管切除术项目的见解。

Promoting Male Involvement in Family Planning: Insights From the No-Scalpel Vasectomy Program of Davao City, Philippines.

机构信息

RTI International Philippines, Pasig City, Philippines.

Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Oct 29;12(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00229.

DOI:10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00229
PMID:39438121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11521553/
Abstract

Despite global consensus on the importance of male involvement in family planning, disparities persist in low- and middle-income countries, where women continue to bear the responsibility for these initiatives. The Philippines, with a high fertility rate and unmet family planning needs, exemplifies this challenge. We present the experiences and lessons learned from implementing the no-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) program in Davao City, showcasing its potential for increasing male engagement in family planning decisions. Launched in 2008, the program aimed to address gender disparity by promoting NSV as a safe and effective contraceptive alternative to female-centric methods. Through the use of culturally sensitive information campaigns and couple-focused counseling, the program challenged traditional notions of masculinity and encouraged shared decision-making. Strong local government commitment and public-private partnerships played key roles in driving the program's success. Results showed an average annual increase of 80% in NSV clients over the past 3 years compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring its effectiveness. The program presents a compelling intervention model for similar initiatives, highlighting how overcoming cultural barriers, infrastructure limitations, and budgetary constraints through policy advocacy, strategic partnerships, and tailored approaches can significantly boost male involvement in family planning and improve reproductive health outcomes within communities.

摘要

尽管全球范围内都认同男性参与计划生育的重要性,但在中低收入国家,男女在承担计划生育责任方面仍存在差距,菲律宾就是一个典型的例子。该国生育率高,计划生育需求未得到满足。我们介绍了在达沃市实施无刀输精管切除术(NSV)项目的经验和教训,展示了该项目在增加男性参与计划生育决策方面的潜力。该项目于 2008 年启动,旨在通过推广 NSV 作为一种安全有效的避孕方法,替代以女性为中心的方法,以解决性别差距问题。通过使用文化敏感的信息宣传和夫妻为中心的咨询,该项目挑战了传统的男性观念,并鼓励共同决策。地方政府的坚定承诺和公私合作伙伴关系在推动该项目成功方面发挥了关键作用。结果显示,在过去 3 年中,与 COVID-19 大流行前相比,NSV 客户的平均年增长率达到了 80%,这突显了该项目的有效性。该项目为类似的倡议提供了一个引人注目的干预模式,强调了如何通过政策倡导、战略伙伴关系和量身定制的方法克服文化障碍、基础设施限制和预算限制,从而大大提高男性参与计划生育的程度,并改善社区内的生殖健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c047/11521553/41afb5f25660/GH-GHSP240087F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c047/11521553/386b56d9f1d7/GH-GHSP240087F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c047/11521553/41afb5f25660/GH-GHSP240087F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c047/11521553/386b56d9f1d7/GH-GHSP240087F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c047/11521553/41afb5f25660/GH-GHSP240087F002.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting Male Involvement in Family Planning: Insights From the No-Scalpel Vasectomy Program of Davao City, Philippines.促进男性参与计划生育:来自菲律宾达沃市无刀输精管切除术项目的见解。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Oct 29;12(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-24-00229.
2
Expand male services: add no-scalpel vasectomy.扩大男性服务项目:增加非手术刀输精管切除术。
Contracept Technol Update. 2000 May;21(5):56-7.
3
Men's involvement in family planning programs: an exploratory study from Karachi, Pakistan.男性参与计划生育项目:来自巴基斯坦卡拉奇的探索性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Oct 3;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01875-1.
4
A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings.资源匮乏环境下输精管结扎术规划和研究十年回顾
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):647-660. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235. Print 2016 Dec 23.
5
Cutting out the scalpel: a unique approach to vasectomies. Interview with Dr. Li Shunqiang, the originator of no-scalpel vasectomy.摒弃手术刀:输精管切除术的独特方法。对无刀输精管切除术创始人李顺强医生的采访。
China Popul Today. 1995 Dec;12(5-6):25-7.
6
No-scalpel vasectomy training in China.中国的非手术刀输精管切除术培训。
Adv Contracept Deliv Syst. 1993;9(1):1-8.
7
MJH Clinic: Tilamsik team surpass 10,000 voluntary sterilizations.MJH诊所:蒂拉姆西克团队的自愿绝育手术量超过1万例。
Newsl Fam Plan Int Assist. 1976 Summer;2(3-4):1.
8
No-scalpel vasectomy: a unique approach to the vas.无刀输精管切除术:一种独特的输精管处理方法。
IPPF Med Bull. 1993 Dec;27(6):1-2.
9
Barriers for low acceptance of no scalpel vasectomy among slum dwellers of Lucknow City.勒克瑙市贫民窟居民对非手术刀输精管切除术接受度低的障碍。
Indian J Public Health. 2019 Jan-Mar;63(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_44_18.
10
Unraveling Factors Shaping the Acceptance and Non-acceptance of Non-scalpel Vasectomy in Rural Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.揭示印度中部农村地区非手术刀输精管切除术接受与不接受情况的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 31;16(1):e53311. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53311. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Down But Not Out: Vasectomy Is Faring Poorly Almost Everywhere-We Can Do Better To Make It A True Method Option.虽受阻但未被弃:输精管切除术在各地表现不佳——我们可以做得更好,使其成为真正的方法选择。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Feb 28;11(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00369.
2
Men's Involvement in Sexual and Reproductive Health Care and Decision Making in the Philippines: A Systematic Review of the Literature.菲律宾男性参与性健康和生殖健康护理及决策的状况:文献系统综述
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Jul-Aug;16(4):15579883221106052. doi: 10.1177/15579883221106052.
3
"The Financial Is the Main Issue, It's Not Even the Child": Exploring the Role of Finances in Men's Concepts of Fatherhood and Fertility Intention.
“经济问题才是主要问题,甚至与孩子无关”:探究经济因素在男性父性观念和生育意愿中的作用
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):1074-1083. doi: 10.1177/1557988318775189. Epub 2018 May 18.
4
Are men well served by family planning programs?计划生育项目对男性有益吗?
Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 23;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0278-5.
5
A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings.资源匮乏环境下输精管结扎术规划和研究十年回顾
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):647-660. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235. Print 2016 Dec 23.
6
Vasectomy: A Long, Slow Haul to Successful Takeoff.输精管切除术:漫长而缓慢的成功之旅。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):514-517. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00355. Print 2016 Dec 23.
7
Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.输精管结扎术的手术刀切口与无手术刀切口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD004112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004112.pub4.
8
Men: the missing client in family planning.男性:计划生育中被忽视的对象。
Am J Mens Health. 2012 Nov;6(6):441. doi: 10.1177/1557988312459340.
9
Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion.评估男性参与作为性与生殖健康促进策略的情况。
Health Promot Int. 2004 Sep;19(3):389-96. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah312.