Dargel Lukas, Thomas-Agnan Christine
Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse France.
BVA Data Factory, Toulouse, France.
J Appl Stat. 2024 Mar 16;51(14):2929-2960. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2329923. eCollection 2024.
This article sheds light on the relationship between compositional data (CoDa) regression models and multiplicative competitive interaction (MCI) models, which are two approaches for modeling shares. We demonstrate that MCI models are particular cases of CoDa models with a total and that a reparameterization links both. Recognizing this relation offers mutual benefits for the CoDa and MCI literature, each with its own rich tradition. The CoDa tradition, with its rigorous mathematical foundation, provides additional theoretical guarantees and mathematical tools that we apply to improve the estimation of MCI models. Simultaneously, the MCI model emerged from almost a century-long tradition in marketing research that may enrich the CoDa literature. One aspect is the grounding of the MCI specification in assumptions on the behavior of individuals. From this basis, the MCI tradition also provides credible justifications for heteroskedastic error structures - an idea we develop further and that is relevant to many CoDa models beyond the marketing context. Additionally, MCI models have always been interpreted in terms of elasticities, a method that has only recently emerged in CoDa. Regarding this interpretation, the CoDa perspective leads to a decomposition of the influence of the explanatory variables into contributions from relative and absolute information.
本文揭示了成分数据(CoDa)回归模型与乘法竞争交互(MCI)模型之间的关系,这两种模型都是用于份额建模的方法。我们证明,MCI模型是具有总量的CoDa模型的特殊情况,并且重新参数化将两者联系起来。认识到这种关系对CoDa和MCI文献都有好处,它们各自都有丰富的传统。CoDa传统具有严谨的数学基础,提供了额外的理论保障和数学工具,我们将其应用于改进MCI模型的估计。同时,MCI模型源于市场营销研究近一个世纪的传统,这可能会丰富CoDa文献。一个方面是MCI规范基于对个体行为的假设。在此基础上,MCI传统还为异方差误差结构提供了可靠的依据——我们进一步发展了这一观点,并且这一观点与营销背景之外的许多CoDa模型相关。此外,MCI模型一直是从弹性角度进行解释的,这种方法最近才在CoDa中出现。关于这种解释,CoDa视角导致将解释变量的影响分解为相对信息和绝对信息的贡献。