• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在不同强度区域进行的四次跑步训练的急性生理反应。

Acute Physiological Responses to Four Running Sessions Performed at Different Intensity Zones.

作者信息

Nuuttila Olli-Pekka, Kyröläinen Heikki, Häkkinen Keijo, Nummela Ari

机构信息

Biology of Physical Activity, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

KIHU - Research Institute for Olympic Sports, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;42(6):513-522. doi: 10.1055/a-1263-1034. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1055/a-1263-1034
PMID:33176386
Abstract

This study investigated acute responses and post 24-h recovery to four running sessions performed at different intensity zones by supine heart rate variability, countermovement jump, and a submaximal running test. A total of 24 recreationally endurance-trained male subjects performed 90 min low-intensity (LIT), 30 min moderate-intensity (MOD), 6×3 min high-intensity interval (HIIT) and 10×30 s supramaximal-intensity interval (SMIT) exercises on a treadmill. Heart rate variability decreased acutely after all sessions, and the decrease was greater after MOD compared to LIT and SMIT (p<0.001; p<0.01) and HIIT compared to LIT (p<0.01). Countermovement jump decreased only after LIT (p<0.01) and SMIT (p<0.001), and the relative changes were different compared to MOD (p<0.01) and HIIT (p<0.001). Countermovement jump remained decreased at 24 h after SMIT (p<0.05). Heart rate during the submaximal running test rebounded below the baseline 24 h after all sessions (p<0.05), while the rating of perceived exertion during the running test remained elevated after HIIT (p<0.05) and SMIT (p<0.01). The current results highlight differences in the physiological demands of the running sessions, and distinct recovery patterns of the measured aspects of performance. Based on these results, assessments of performance and recovery from multiple perspectives may provide valuable information for endurance athletes, and help to improve the quality of training monitoring.

摘要

本研究通过仰卧心率变异性、纵跳和次最大强度跑步测试,调查了在不同强度区域进行的四次跑步训练的急性反应和24小时后的恢复情况。共有24名具有休闲耐力训练经历的男性受试者在跑步机上进行了90分钟的低强度(LIT)、30分钟的中等强度(MOD)、6×3分钟的高强度间歇(HIIT)和10×30秒的超最大强度间歇(SMIT)运动。所有训练后心率变异性均急性下降,与LIT和SMIT相比,MOD后下降幅度更大(p<0.001;p<0.01),与LIT相比,HIIT后下降幅度更大(p<0.01)。纵跳仅在LIT(p<0.01)和SMIT(p<0.001)后下降,与MOD(p<0.01)和HIIT(p<0.001)相比,相对变化不同。SMIT后24小时纵跳仍下降(p<0.05)。所有训练后24小时,次最大强度跑步测试期间的心率反弹至基线以下(p<0.05),而跑步测试期间的主观用力程度在HIIT(p<0.05)和SMIT(p<0.01)后仍保持升高。当前结果突出了跑步训练生理需求的差异,以及所测运动表现方面的不同恢复模式。基于这些结果,从多个角度对运动表现和恢复进行评估,可能为耐力运动员提供有价值的信息,并有助于提高训练监测的质量。

相似文献

1
Acute Physiological Responses to Four Running Sessions Performed at Different Intensity Zones.对在不同强度区域进行的四次跑步训练的急性生理反应。
Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;42(6):513-522. doi: 10.1055/a-1263-1034. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Effects of a 4-week high-intensity interval training on pacing during 5-km running trial.为期4周的高强度间歇训练对5公里跑步试验中配速的影响。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017 Oct 19;50(12):e6335. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20176335.
3
A Submaximal Running Test With Postexercise Cardiac Autonomic and Neuromuscular Function in Monitoring Endurance Training Adaptation.一项通过运动后心脏自主神经和神经肌肉功能进行的次最大强度跑步测试,用于监测耐力训练适应性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jan;31(1):233-243. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001458.
4
Adding LIT to HIIT: Is Low-Intensity Training Vital for Endurance-Trained Athletes during a 7-day HIIT Shock Microcycle?添加低强度训练(LIT)到高强度间歇训练(HIIT)中:在 7 天高强度间歇训练(HIIT)冲击微周期中,低强度训练对于耐力训练运动员至关重要吗?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Aug 1;56(8):1408-1421. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003435. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
5
Physiological Response Differences between Run and Cycle High Intensity Interval Training Program in Recreational Middle Age Female Runners.业余中年女性跑步者在跑步和循环高强度间歇训练计划中的生理反应差异。
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Aug 13;19(3):508-516. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Acute responses and muscle damage in different high-intensity interval running protocols.不同高强度间歇跑方案中的急性反应和肌肉损伤
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 May;56(5):606-15.
7
Functional Vs. Running Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training: Effects on VOmax and Muscular Endurance.功能性与低容量高强度间歇训练:对最大摄氧量和肌肉耐力的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Aug 1;18(3):497-504. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Impact of supra-maximal interval training vs. high-intensity interval training on cardiac auto-regulation response in physically active adults.超最大间歇训练与高强度间歇训练对体育活动成年人心脏自主调节反应的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Jun;124(6):1771-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00421-023-05402-1. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
9
Physiological, Perceptual, and Performance Responses to the 2-Week Block of High- versus Low-Intensity Endurance Training.两周高强度与低强度耐力训练对生理、感知和表现的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 May 1;54(5):851-860. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002861. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Dissimilar Physiological and Perceptual Responses Between Sprint Interval Training and High-Intensity Interval Training.短跑间歇训练与高强度间歇训练之间不同的生理和感知反应
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jan;30(1):244-50. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001042.

引用本文的文献

1
The accuracy of fixed intensity anchors to estimate lactate thresholds in recreational runners.固定强度锚定法用于估计普通跑步者乳酸阈值的准确性。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05748-8.
2
High-intensity interval aerobic exercise delays recovery from heart rate variability: a systematic review with meta-analysis.高强度间歇有氧运动延缓心率变异性的恢复:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Auton Res. 2025 Jun;35(3):365-379. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01103-7. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Morning versus Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Responses to Intensified Training in Recreational Runners.
晨练与夜练对业余跑步者强化训练的心率及心率变异性反应
Sports Med Open. 2024 Nov 6;10(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00779-5.
4
Durability in recreational runners: effects of 90-min low-intensity exercise on the running speed at the lactate threshold.耐力跑者的耐力:90分钟低强度运动对乳酸阈速度的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Mar;125(3):697-705. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05631-y. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Differences in Physiological and Perceptual Responses to High Intensity Interval Exercise Between Arm and Leg Cycling.手臂骑行和腿部骑行时对高强度间歇运动的生理及感知反应差异。
Front Physiol. 2021 Aug 18;12:700294. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.700294. eCollection 2021.
6
Monitoring Training and Recovery during a Period of Increased Intensity or Volume in Recreational Endurance Athletes.监测业余耐力运动员增加强度或训练量期间的训练和恢复情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2401. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052401.