Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0305148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305148. eCollection 2024.
As social media becomes a key channel for news consumption and sharing, proliferating partisan and mainstream news sources must increasingly compete for users' attention. While affective qualities of news content may promote engagement, it is not clear whether news source bias influences affective content production or virality, or whether any differences have changed over time. We analyzed the sentiment of ~30 million posts (on twitter.com) from 182 U.S. news sources that ranged from extreme left to right bias over the course of a decade (2011-2020). Biased news sources (on both left and right) produced more high arousal negative affective content than balanced sources. High arousal negative content also increased reposting for biased versus balanced sources. The combination of increased prevalence and virality for high arousal negative affective content was not evident for other types of affective content. Over a decade, the virality of high arousal negative affective content also increased, particularly in balanced news sources, and in posts about politics. Together, these findings reveal that high arousal negative affective content may promote the spread of news from biased sources, and conversely imply that sentiment analysis tools might help social media users to counteract these trends.
随着社交媒体成为新闻消费和分享的主要渠道,不断增多的党派性和主流新闻来源必须越来越多地争夺用户的注意力。虽然新闻内容的情感质量可能会促进参与度,但目前尚不清楚新闻来源的偏见是否会影响情感内容的制作或传播,或者这些差异是否随时间发生了变化。我们分析了 182 家美国新闻来源在十年(2011-2020 年)期间在 twitter.com 上发布的约 3000 万条帖子的情绪,这些新闻来源的偏见程度从极度左到极度右不等。有偏见的新闻来源(左右两边都有)发布的高唤醒度负性情感内容比平衡的新闻来源多。高唤醒度负性内容也增加了偏见来源与平衡来源的转发。高唤醒度负性情感内容的流行度和传播度的增加,对于其他类型的情感内容并不明显。在过去的十年中,高唤醒度负性情感内容的传播度也有所增加,特别是在平衡的新闻来源和有关政治的帖子中。这些发现表明,高唤醒度负性情感内容可能会促进来自偏见性新闻来源的新闻传播,相反,这意味着情感分析工具可能有助于社交媒体用户抵制这些趋势。