• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析复杂的相互作用:贸易开放度对非洲二氧化碳排放的异质性、阈值和中介效应。

Deciphering the complex interplay: Heterogeneous, threshold, and mediation effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in Africa.

机构信息

Department of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0309736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309736. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309736
PMID:39441820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11498691/
Abstract

Despite having barely anything to do with the issue of CO2 emissions, Africa has been experiencing more severe climate change and its adverse effects than most other regions of the globe. However, the issue of CO2 emissions and its adverse effects has received relatively little attention in the African research arena. To this end, the present research assesses the effect of trade openness on the CO2 emissions utilizing panel data from 46 African countries spanning 2000 through 2022. To account for the possible heterogeneity and nonlinearity, the panel quantile regression and threshold methods were employed. Moreover, this study investigates the key mediating effects of the channel. The empirical findings show that greater trade openness is associated with significantly higher CO2 emission, additionally; it demonstrates that the influence is heterogeneous across different CO2 emission quantiles in African countries. Besides the result from the double threshold model reveals a complex, nonlinear relationship between trade openness and CO2 emissions in Africa. Moreover, the findings divulge that openness to trade indirectly reduces CO2 emissions through the substitution and technology channels whereas it indirectly increases carbon dioxide production via the economic track. Therefore, it is vital to promote the use of renewable energy, effectively leverage the knowledge spillover effects of trade to decrease energy intensity and formulate pertinent policies aimed at curbing carbon emissions and addressing the imminent threat of climate change in Africa. Besides, the nonlinear and heterogeneous effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions suggest that policies and interventions related to the impact of trade openness on CO2 emissions should consider the current level of carbon dioxide emissions.

摘要

尽管与二氧化碳排放问题几乎没有任何关系,但非洲经历的气候变化及其不利影响比全球大多数其他地区都更为严重。然而,二氧化碳排放及其不利影响问题在非洲研究领域并没有得到太多关注。为此,本研究利用 2000 年至 2022 年期间来自 46 个非洲国家的面板数据,评估了贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的影响。为了考虑可能的异质性和非线性,采用了面板分位数回归和门槛方法。此外,本研究还探讨了渠道的关键中介效应。实证结果表明,贸易开放度的增加与二氧化碳排放量的显著增加有关;此外,还表明这种影响在非洲国家不同的二氧化碳排放分位数之间存在异质性。此外,双门槛模型的结果揭示了非洲贸易开放度与二氧化碳排放之间存在复杂的非线性关系。此外,研究结果表明,贸易开放度通过替代和技术渠道间接地减少二氧化碳排放,而通过经济渠道间接地增加二氧化碳的产生。因此,在非洲,促进可再生能源的使用、有效地利用贸易的知识溢出效应来降低能源强度,并制定相关政策以遏制碳排放和应对气候变化的迫在眉睫威胁至关重要。此外,贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的非线性和异质性影响表明,与贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的影响相关的政策和干预措施应考虑当前的二氧化碳排放水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/afacc0e71867/pone.0309736.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/9b7ed89d997e/pone.0309736.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/43516bf22e22/pone.0309736.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/afacc0e71867/pone.0309736.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/9b7ed89d997e/pone.0309736.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/43516bf22e22/pone.0309736.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b08d/11498691/afacc0e71867/pone.0309736.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Deciphering the complex interplay: Heterogeneous, threshold, and mediation effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in Africa.解析复杂的相互作用:贸易开放度对非洲二氧化碳排放的异质性、阈值和中介效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0309736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309736. eCollection 2024.
2
The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach.可再生能源消费和贸易开放度对瑞典碳排放的非对称影响:分位数-分位数回归方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):1875-1886. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15706-4. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Effect of economic growth, energy use, trade openness and foreign direct investments on carbon dioxide emissions. Evidence from G8 countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易开放和外国直接投资对二氧化碳排放的影响。八国集团国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(53):113538-113552. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29827-5. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Climate change mitigation role of renewable energy consumption: Does institutional quality matter in the case of reducing Africa's carbon dioxide emissions?可再生能源消费对气候变化缓解的作用:在减少非洲二氧化碳排放方面,制度质量是否重要?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Sep 15;342:118234. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118234. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
5
Foreign aid and economic growth: Do energy consumption, trade openness and CO2 emissions matter? A DSUR heterogeneous evidence from Africa's trading blocs.外援与经济增长:能源消耗、贸易开放度和二氧化碳排放是否重要?来自非洲贸易集团的 DSUR 异质证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253457. eCollection 2021.
6
Does economic growth, international trade, and urbanization uphold environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa? Insights from quantile and causality procedures.经济增长、国际贸易和城市化是否能维持撒哈拉以南非洲的环境可持续性?分位数和因果关系程序的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(22):28222-28233. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12539-z. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
Sustainable development of West African economies to achieve environmental quality.实现环境质量目标,促进西非经济可持续发展。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):15253-15266. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23180-9. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO emissions: an empirical analysis.信息通信技术、金融发展、增长和贸易开放度对二氧化碳排放的影响:实证分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Oct;25(30):30708-30719. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3108-6. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
The impact of democracy and income on CO emissions in MINT countries: evidence from quantile regression model.民主和收入对 MINT 国家二氧化碳排放的影响:来自分位数回归模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52762-52783. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25805-z. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
10
Trade openness and environment: a panel data analysis for 88 selected BRI countries.贸易开放与环境:对88个“一带一路”沿线选定国家的面板数据分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23249-23263. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17037-w. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Carbon emissions and the rising effect of trade openness and foreign direct investment: Evidence from a threshold regression model.碳排放与贸易开放度和外国直接投资的上升效应:来自门槛回归模型的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 26;9(7):e17448. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17448. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
The effects of economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in selected Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries.经济增长对撒哈拉以南非洲部分国家二氧化碳排放的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 20;8(11):e11193. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11193. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Decoupling relationship analysis between urbanization and carbon emissions in 33 African countries.
33个非洲国家城市化与碳排放之间的解耦关系分析
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 30;8(9):e10423. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10423. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Do technological innovations and trade openness reduce CO emissions? Evidence from selected middle-income countries.技术创新和贸易开放度是否会降低二氧化碳排放量?来自部分中等收入国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):65723-65738. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20434-4. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
5
Assessing the impact of oil and gas trading, foreign direct investment inflows, and economic growth on carbon emission for OPEC member countries.评估石油和天然气交易、外国直接投资流入以及经济增长对欧佩克成员国碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(28):43089-43101. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18156-0. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
Urbanization and carbon emissions: a panel threshold analysis.城市化与碳排放:面板门槛分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 May;28(20):26073-26081. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12443-6. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
GHG emissions and fossil energy use as consequences of efforts of improving human well-being in Africa.温室气体排放和化石能源使用是改善非洲人类福祉努力的结果。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Nov 1;273:111136. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111136. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Are eco-innovation and export diversification mutually exclusive to control carbon emissions in G-7 countries?七国集团(G-7)控制碳排放,生态创新和出口多样化是否相互排斥?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110829. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
9
Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy.七国集团基于消费的碳排放与国际贸易:环境创新和可再生能源的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 15;730:138945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation?发展中国家贸易开放的环境效应:冲突还是合作?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19783-19797. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9. Epub 2020 Mar 28.