• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生研究中的共同创造:基本原则简介。

Co-creation in public health research: an introduction to basic principles.

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), School of Health and Social Development, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Res Pract. 2024 Oct 23;34(3):3432419. doi: 10.17061/phrp3432419.

DOI:10.17061/phrp3432419
PMID:39443091
Abstract

Co-creation is a participatory design approach that leverages the experiential knowledge of non-academic actors. It is increasingly adopted in public health research to enhance the relevance, acceptability, and impact of interventions. This perspective article provides a practical introduction to co-creation, its application, and benefits and considerations for public health researchers. Based on the authors' experiences with co-creation in public health, four key considerations for co-creation are outlined: 1) the selection of collaborators (those participating in the co-creation process) and their power dynamics and interests; 2) frameworks and guidelines for the co-creation process; 3) capacities needed to successfully apply a co-creation approach, such as emotional intelligence and adaptability; and 4) practical matters, such as resources and ethics approval. These insights serve as a practical introduction for public health researchers considering the application of co-creation in their projects to facilitate more effective and impactful, user-centered research designs and interventions.

摘要

共创是一种参与式设计方法,利用非学术参与者的经验知识。它在公共卫生研究中越来越多地被采用,以提高干预措施的相关性、可接受性和影响力。本文从实践角度介绍了共创及其应用,以及对公共卫生研究人员的益处和考虑因素。基于作者在公共卫生领域的共创经验,概述了共创的四个关键考虑因素:1)合作者的选择(参与共创过程的人)及其权力动态和利益;2)共创过程的框架和准则;3)成功应用共创方法所需的能力,如情商和适应性;4)实际问题,如资源和伦理批准。这些观点为考虑在项目中应用共创的公共卫生研究人员提供了实用介绍,以促进更有效和有影响力的、以用户为中心的研究设计和干预措施。

相似文献

1
Co-creation in public health research: an introduction to basic principles.公共卫生研究中的共同创造:基本原则简介。
Public Health Res Pract. 2024 Oct 23;34(3):3432419. doi: 10.17061/phrp3432419.
2
A participatory research to assess how a student citizens' assembly can facilitate the co-creation of nutrition interventions in higher education settings.一项参与式研究,评估学生公民大会如何促进高等教育环境中营养干预措施的共同创造。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):2772. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20277-3.
3
Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.公民参与健康、护理或福祉技术创新研究:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.
4
Community-Based Participatory Research and Human-Centered Design Principles to Advance Hearing Health Equity.基于社区的参与式研究和以人为中心的设计原则,推进听力健康公平。
Ear Hear. 2022;43(Suppl 1):33S-44S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001183. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
5
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions.在公共卫生干预措施的共同创造和评估中运用参与式方法的框架、原则和建议。
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 9;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9. eCollection 2019.
6
Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study.通过社区卫生服务中的共同创造实现研究影响力:文献综述与案例研究
Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):392-429. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197.
7
[Research questions in participatory projects. Critical reflections from the project "Longing in later life"].[参与式项目中的研究问题。来自“晚年的渴望”项目的批判性反思]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Aug;56(5):376-381. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02216-w. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge.基于社区的参与式研究和综合知识转化:推进知识的共同创造。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
9
Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees.共同设计与实施研究:伦理委员会面临的挑战与解决方案
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 16;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.
10
Conducting co-creation for public health in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and key informant perspectives on implementation barriers and facilitators.在中低收入国家开展公共卫生共创:系统评价和主要知情人对实施障碍和促进因素的看法。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 17;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01014-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on Trustworthy AI for Parkinson Disease Management Using a Cocreation Approach: Qualitative Exploratory Study.利益相关者对使用共创方法进行帕金森病管理的可信人工智能的看法:定性探索性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 6;27:e73710. doi: 10.2196/73710.
2
Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.与欧洲弱势群体共同创建心理健康促进与预防干预措施:一项关于共同创建实施和参与性评估的混合方法研究方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1.
3
Cocreating a programme to prevent injuries and improve performance in Australian Police Force recruits: a study protocol.
共同创建一项预防澳大利亚警察部队新兵受伤并提高其体能表现的计划:一项研究方案。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025 Mar 12;11(1):e002531. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002531. eCollection 2025.
4
Building Healthier Communities in the Workplace: The Impact of a Year-Long Lifestyle Intervention on Food Access, Quality of Life, and Health Metrics.在工作场所建设更健康的社区:为期一年的生活方式干预对食物获取、生活质量和健康指标的影响。
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 11;17(4):637. doi: 10.3390/nu17040637.