• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国临床医生在护理点何处寻找信息?一项务实的探索性研究。

Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Oxford, Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02627-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02627-7
PMID:39443868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515728/
Abstract

AIM

To describe where clinical information is contemporarily and commonly found in UK primary care, what is favoured by clinicians, and whether this is (1) publicly funded (2) has commercial potential conflicts of interest.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A mixed methods study, consisting of (1) site visits to general practices in Scotland, (2) online questionnaire, focused on UK general practice (3) analysis of materials cited by professionals.

METHODS

Data about sources of clinical information used was obtained verbally, visually and via search histories on computers from visits. This was used to inform a questionnaire in which primary care clinicians in the four nations of the UK were invited to participate. This obtained data about the information sources used and preferred by clinicians. This information was searched for data about funding and conflicts of interest.

RESULTS

Over 2022, four practices were visited. 337 clinicians, 280 of whom were general practitioners completed an online questionnaire. 136 different resources were identified. These were mainly websites but sources of information included colleagues, either in practice or through online networks, apps, local guidelines, health charities, and learning resources aimed at GPs. Of these, 70 were not publicly funded, and were a mixture of membership organisations, charities, or sponsored venues.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care clinicians obtain information for themselves and patients from a wide variety of sources. Funding is from a variety of sources and some contain advertising and/or sponsorship, risking commercial bias.

PROTOCOL

Pre-published at https://osf.io/wrzqk .

摘要

目的

描述临床信息在英国初级保健中当前和常见的位置,临床医生偏好哪些信息,以及这些信息是否(1)由公共资金资助,(2)存在商业利益冲突。

设计和设置

一项混合方法研究,包括(1)对苏格兰的普通实践进行现场访问,(2)在线问卷调查,重点是英国的普通实践,(3)对专业人员引用的材料进行分析。

方法

通过现场访问,口头、视觉和计算机搜索历史记录获取有关使用的临床信息来源的数据。这被用于为一个问卷提供信息,邀请英国四个国家的初级保健临床医生参与。该问卷获取了临床医生使用和偏好的信息来源的数据。这些信息被搜索有关资金和利益冲突的数据。

结果

在 2022 年期间,访问了四家实践。337 名临床医生,其中 280 名为全科医生,完成了在线问卷。确定了 136 种不同的资源。这些资源主要是网站,但信息来源包括同事,无论是在实践中还是通过在线网络、应用程序、当地指南、健康慈善机构和针对全科医生的学习资源。其中,70 种资源不由公共资金资助,是会员组织、慈善机构或赞助场所的混合体。

结论

初级保健临床医生从各种来源为自己和患者获取信息。资金来源多种多样,其中一些包含广告和/或赞助,存在商业偏见的风险。

协议

在 https://osf.io/wrzqk 上预先发布。

相似文献

1
Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study.英国临床医生在护理点何处寻找信息?一项务实的探索性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02627-7.
2
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
3
'You feel like you've been duped': is the current system for health professionals declaring potential conflicts of interest in the UK fit for purpose? A mixed methods study.“你觉得自己好像被骗了”:英国现行的健康专业人员申报潜在利益冲突的制度是否合理?一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 26;13(7):e072996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072996.
4
Variation in general practitioners' information-seeking behaviour - a cross-sectional study on the influence of gender, age and practice form.全科医生信息搜寻行为的差异——一项关于性别、年龄和执业形式影响的横断面研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):327-335. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249057. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
6
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
7
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Utilisation of internet resources for continuing professional development: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Scotland.利用互联网资源促进持续专业发展:对苏格兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 21;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0540-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Industry-funded medical education is always promotion-an essay by Adriane Fugh-Berman.行业资助的医学教育总是在推销——阿德里亚娜·富格-伯曼的一篇文章
BMJ. 2021 Jun 4;373:n1273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1273.
2
Clinical information seeking behavior of physicians: A systematic review.医生的临床信息检索行为:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104144. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
3
Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.用于评估医疗保健专业人员基于证据的即时医疗信息可信度的工具:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 17;22(1):e15415. doi: 10.2196/15415.
4
Impact of Clinicians' Use of Electronic Knowledge Resources on Clinical and Learning Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临床医生使用电子知识资源对临床及学习成果的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 25;21(7):e13315. doi: 10.2196/13315.
5
Knowledge mobilisation: an ethnographic study of the influence of practitioner mindlines on atopic eczema self-management in primary care in the UK.知识转化:英国初级保健中医患思维模式对特应性皮炎自我管理影响的民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e025220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025220.
6
Content analysis of clinical questions from Australian general practice which are prioritised for answering: identifying common question types and perceived knowledge gaps.对澳大利亚全科医疗中优先回答的临床问题进行内容分析:确定常见问题类型和感知的知识差距。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;25(1):15-21. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111210. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
Availability and use of cancer decision-support tools: a cross-sectional survey of UK primary care.癌症决策支持工具的可及性和使用情况:一项对英国初级保健的横断面调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e437-e443. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X703745. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Electronic Knowledge Resources and Point-of-Care Learning: A Scoping Review.电子知识资源与即时学习:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S60-S67. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002375.
9
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.
10
Utilisation of internet resources for continuing professional development: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Scotland.利用互联网资源促进持续专业发展:对苏格兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 21;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0540-5.