Ries C P, Daehler J L
J Am Diet Assoc. 1986 Feb;86(2):228-33.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Nutrient Guide as a quantitative estimate of dietary adequacy. Using 24-hour dietary recalls of 300 men, food group and overall diet scores based on the Nutrient Guide were compared with nutrient adequacy ratios for eight nutrients and a mean adequacy ratio derived from nutrient analysis. Caloric, fat, and sodium intakes estimated using Nutrient Guide ratings were also compared with nutrient Nutrient Guide ratings were also compared with nutrient analysis estimates. Correlations between food group scores and nutrient adequacy ratios were all positive and significant. Regression analyses revealed a strong linear relationship between caloric, fat, and sodium intakes estimated by the two methods and a curvilinear relationship between mean adequacy ratio and total diet score. These results suggest that the Nutrient Guide can be used to provide a reasonable estimate of adequacy for the nutrients upon which the guide is currently based. Food group and total diet scores in either the upper or lower ends of the score ranges seemed to be better predictors of individual nutrient or overall dietary adequacy than did mid-range scores, which slightly underestimated dietary adequacy of the selected nutrients.
本研究的目的是评估营养指南作为饮食充足性定量估计的有效性。通过对300名男性进行24小时饮食回顾,将基于营养指南的食物组和总体饮食得分与八种营养素的营养充足率以及从营养分析得出的平均充足率进行比较。使用营养指南评级估算的热量、脂肪和钠摄入量也与营养分析估算值进行了比较。食物组得分与营养充足率之间的相关性均为正且显著。回归分析显示,两种方法估算的热量、脂肪和钠摄入量之间存在强线性关系,平均充足率与总体饮食得分之间存在曲线关系。这些结果表明,营养指南可用于对指南目前所基于的营养素的充足性提供合理估计。得分范围上端或下端的食物组和总体饮食得分似乎比中间范围得分更能预测个体营养素或总体饮食充足性,中间范围得分略微低估了所选营养素的饮食充足性。