Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Jun;13(3):1927-1937. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12996. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
Patients with a first hip fracture are at high risk of fracturing their other hip. Despite this, preventive therapy is often not given. Because little is known about specific risk factors of a second hip fracture, we investigated the association with areal bone mineral density (aBMD), muscle size, and density. We also investigated whether muscle parameters predict the risk of a contralateral fracture independently of aBMD.
Three groups were included, one without hip fracture (a subcohort of the China Action on Spine and Hip Status study), one with a first, and one with a second hip fracture. Subjects with fractures were recruited from the longitudinal Chinese Second Hip Fracture Evaluation (CSHFE). Computed tomography scans of CSHFE patients, which were obtained immediately following their first fracture, were used to measure cross-sectional area and density of the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and gluteus medius and minimus (G.Med/MinM) muscles. Computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure aBMD of the contralateral femur. Median follow-up time to second fracture was 4.5 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) of second hip fracture risk in subjects with a first hip fracture. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to compare odds ratios (OR) for the risk of a first and second hip fracture.
Three hundred and one participants (68.4 ± 6.1 years, 64% female) without and 302 participants (74.6 ± 9.9 years, 71% female) with a first hip fracture were included in the analysis. Among the latter, 45 (79.2 ± 7.1 years) sustained a second hip fracture. ORs for first hip fracture were significant for aBMD and muscle size and density. ORs for a second fracture were smaller by a factor of 3 to 4 and no longer significant for femoral neck (FN) aBMD. HRs for predicting second hip fracture confirmed the results. G.Med/MinM density (HR, 1.68; CI, 1.20-2.35) and intertrochanter aBMD (HR, 1.62; CI, 1.13-2.31) were the most significant. FN aBMD was not significant. G.Med/MinM density remained significant for predicting second hip fracture after adjustment for FN (HR, 1.66; Cl, 1.18-2.30) or total hip aBMD (HR, 1.50; 95% Cl, 1.04-2.15).
Density of the G.Med/MinM muscle is an aBMD independent predictor of the risk of second hip fracture. Intertrochanteric aBMD is a better predictor of second hip fracture than FN and total hip aBMD. These results may trigger a paradigm shift in the assessment of second hip fracture risk and prevention strategies.
初次髋部骨折的患者再次发生髋部骨折的风险很高。尽管如此,预防性治疗通常并未得到实施。由于对于导致二次髋部骨折的具体风险因素知之甚少,我们对骨矿物质密度(aBMD)、肌肉大小和密度与骨折的关联性进行了研究。我们还研究了肌肉参数是否可以独立于 aBMD 预测对侧骨折的风险。
纳入了三组人群,一组无髋部骨折(来自中国脊柱和髋部状况研究的一个亚组),一组发生了初次髋部骨折,一组发生了二次髋部骨折。初次髋部骨折患者是从中国二次髋部骨折评估(CSHFE)的纵向研究中招募的。利用 CSHFE 患者初次骨折后即刻获取的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描,测量臀大肌(G.MaxM)和臀中肌/小肌(G.Med/MinM)的横截面积和密度。利用 CT 射线吸收法测量对侧股骨的 aBMD。二次髋部骨折的中位随访时间为 4.5 年。使用 Cox 比例风险模型计算初次髋部骨折患者发生二次髋部骨折风险的风险比(HR)。使用多变量逻辑回归比较初次和二次髋部骨折的风险比(OR)。
纳入了 301 名(68.4±6.1 岁,64%为女性)无初次髋部骨折的参与者和 302 名(74.6±9.9 岁,71%为女性)发生初次髋部骨折的参与者。后者中有 45 名(79.2±7.1 岁)发生了二次髋部骨折。初次髋部骨折的 OR 与 aBMD 和肌肉大小及密度相关。二次骨折的 OR 小 3 到 4 倍,且股骨颈(FN)aBMD 的 OR 不再显著。预测二次髋部骨折的 HR 结果与上述结果一致。臀中肌/小肌密度(HR,1.68;95%CI,1.20-2.35)和转子间区 aBMD(HR,1.62;95%CI,1.13-2.31)的预测价值最为显著。FN aBMD 不显著。调整 FN(HR,1.66;95%CI,1.18-2.30)或全髋关节 aBMD(HR,1.50;95%CI,1.04-2.15)后,臀中肌/小肌密度仍与二次髋部骨折相关。
臀中肌/小肌密度是 aBMD 独立预测二次髋部骨折风险的指标。转子间区 aBMD 比 FN 和全髋关节 aBMD 更能预测二次髋部骨折。这些结果可能会引发对二次髋部骨折风险评估和预防策略的观念转变。