Starup-Hansen Joachim, Williams Simon C, Valetopoulou Alexandra, Khan Danyal Z, Horsfall Hugo Layard, Moudgil-Joshi Jigishaa, Burton Oliver, Kanona Hala, Saeed Shakeel R, Muirhead William, Marcus Hani J, Grover Patrick
Victor Horsley Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Jan 22;85(Suppl 2):e117-e130. doi: 10.1055/a-2222-0184. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Despite advances in skull-base reconstruction techniques, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks remain a common complication following retrosigmoid (RS) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We aimed to review and classify the available strategies used to prevent CSF leaks following RS VS surgery. A systematic review, including studies of adults undergoing RS VS surgery since 2000, was conducted. Repair protocols were synthesized into a narrative summary, and a taxonomic classification of techniques and materials was produced. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were described. All 42 studies were case series, of which 34 were retrospective, and eight were prospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A repair taxonomy was produced considering seven distinct stages to CSF leak prevention, including intraoperative approaches to the dura, internal auditory canal (IAC), air cells, RS bony defect, extracranial soft tissue, postoperative dressings, and CSF diversion. Notably, there was significant heterogeneity among institutions, particularly in the dural and IAC stages. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6.3% (IQR: 1.3-8.44%). The intraoperative strategies used to prevent CSF leaks during RS VS surgery vary between and within institutions. As a result of this heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of CSF leak predictive factors, a meaningful comparative analysis of repair protocols was not feasible. Instead, we propose the development of a prospective multicenter observational evaluation designed to accurately capture a comprehensive dataset of potential CSF risk factors, including all stages of the operative repair protocol.
尽管颅底重建技术取得了进展,但脑脊液(CSF)漏仍是乙状窦后(RS)前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)手术后常见的并发症。我们旨在回顾和分类用于预防RS VS手术后脑脊液漏的现有策略。
进行了一项系统综述,包括对2000年以来接受RS VS手术的成年人的研究。将修复方案综合成叙述性总结,并对技术和材料进行分类学分类。此外,还描述了不同修复方案的优缺点以及相关的脑脊液漏发生率。
所有42项研究均为病例系列,其中34项为回顾性研究,8项为前瞻性研究。修复策略包括自体移植物、异种移植物和合成材料的异质组合。考虑到预防脑脊液漏的七个不同阶段,制定了一种修复分类法,包括术中对硬脑膜、内耳道(IAC)、气房、RS骨缺损、颅外软组织、术后敷料和脑脊液分流的处理方法。值得注意的是,各机构之间存在显著异质性,尤其是在硬脑膜和IAC阶段。脑脊液漏的术后中位发生率为6.3%(四分位间距:1.3-8.44%)。
RS VS手术期间用于预防脑脊液漏的术中策略在不同机构之间以及机构内部存在差异。由于这种异质性以及脑脊液漏预测因素报告的不一致性,对修复方案进行有意义的比较分析是不可行的。相反,我们建议开展一项前瞻性多中心观察性评估,旨在准确获取潜在脑脊液危险因素的综合数据集,包括手术修复方案的所有阶段。