Suppr超能文献

教师教育中反思性写作的混合方法研究。

Mixed methods research on reflective writing in teacher education.

作者信息

Gläser-Zikuda Michaela, Zhang Chengming, Hofmann Florian, Plößl Lea, Pösse Lisa, Artmann Michaela

机构信息

Institute for Educational Science, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

Institute for Children and School Education, University of Gießen, Gießen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1394641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1394641. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In this paper, mixed methods research is presented and discussed in the context of research on reflective writing for the professional development of pre-service teachers. First, we present prominent theoretical frameworks to analyze reflective writings. Second, we review relevant methodological approaches of research on reflective writings in teacher education, such as qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Third, we present a study from our research lab combining qualitative content analysis and linguistic analyses as an example for a concurrent mixed method approach. The results of the qualitative content analysis indicated that 198 reflective writings of pre-service teachers were primarily descriptive and on a low level. Computational linguistic analyses revealed that affective and cognitive terminology utilization in reflective writing differed significantly across the different levels of reflection, with a higher frequency of such terms correlating with deeper levels of reflection. Thus, essential challenges and opportunities of implementing such a mixed method study to analyze reflective writings are illustrated and discussed. Finally, we conclude the paper by discussing on how mixed methods approaches might be further advanced in the field of reflective writing research in teacher education.

摘要

在本文中,混合方法研究是在针对职前教师专业发展的反思性写作研究背景下进行呈现和讨论的。首先,我们提出用于分析反思性写作的突出理论框架。其次,我们回顾教师教育中反思性写作研究的相关方法论方法,如定性、定量和混合方法。第三,我们展示了我们研究实验室的一项研究,该研究将定性内容分析和语言分析相结合,作为并发混合方法的一个示例。定性内容分析的结果表明,职前教师的198篇反思性写作主要是描述性的,且水平较低。计算语言学分析表明,反思性写作中情感和认知术语的使用在不同反思水平上存在显著差异,此类术语的较高频率与更深层次的反思相关。因此,阐述并讨论了实施此类混合方法研究以分析反思性写作的基本挑战和机遇。最后,我们通过讨论混合方法在教师教育反思性写作研究领域如何可能得到进一步推进来结束本文。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad83/11496957/04202e18be1c/fpsyg-15-1394641-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验