Suppr超能文献

一种用于分析医学生反思性写作中语言模式的词数统计方法。

A word-count approach to analyze linguistic patterns in the reflective writings of medical students.

作者信息

Lin Chi-Wei, Lin Meei-Ju, Wen Chin-Chen, Chu Shao-Yin

机构信息

Department of Counseling & Clinical Psychology, Dong Hwa University, Taiwan.

Department of Human Development, Tzu Chi University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 1;21:29522. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29522. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teaching reflection and administering reflective writing assignments to students are widely practiced and discussed in medical education and health professional education. However, little is known about how medical students use language to construct their narratives. Exploring students' linguistic patterns in their reflective writings can facilitate understanding the scope and facets of their reflections and their representational or communication approaches to share their experiences. Moreover, research findings regarding gender differences in language use are inconsistent. Therefore, we attempted to examine how females and males differ in their use of words in reflective writing within our research circumstance to detect the unique and gender-specific approaches to learning and their applications.

METHODS

We analyzed the linguistic profiles of psychological process categories in the reflective writings of medical students and examined the difference in word usage between male and female medical students. During the first year of a clinical rotation, 60 fifth-year medical students wrote reflective narratives regarding pediatric patients and the psychosocial challenges faced by the patients and their family members. The narratives were analyzed using the Chinese version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (CLIWC), a text analysis software program. Multivariate procedures were applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Cognitive words were most pervasive, averaging 22.16%, whereas perceptual words (2.86%) were least pervasive. Female students used more words related to positive emotions and sadness than did male students. The male students exceeded the female students only in the space category. The major limitation of this study is that CLIWC cannot directly acquire contextual text meanings; therefore, depending on the research topic, further qualitative study of the given texts might be necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

To enhance students' empathy toward the psychosocial issues faced by patients and their family members, students should be encouraged to explore the domain of psychological processes by identifying and expressing their affective and perceptual experiences. Researchers in future studies should use outcome measures such as self-awareness or empathy to determine the overall effectiveness of reflective writing and how changes in linguistic patterns affect such outcomes.

摘要

背景

教学反思以及给学生布置反思性写作任务在医学教育和健康专业教育中广泛应用并得到讨论。然而,对于医学生如何运用语言构建他们的叙事了解甚少。探究学生反思性写作中的语言模式有助于理解他们反思的范围和方面,以及他们分享经历的表现或交流方式。此外,关于语言使用中性别差异的研究结果并不一致。因此,我们试图在我们的研究环境中考察男女医学生在反思性写作中用词的差异,以发现独特的、因性别而异的学习方法及其应用。

方法

我们分析了医学生反思性写作中心理过程类别的语言特征,并研究了男女医学生在用词上的差异。在临床轮转的第一年,60名五年级医学生撰写了关于儿科患者以及患者及其家属所面临的社会心理挑战的反思性叙事。使用文本分析软件程序《语言调查与字数统计》(Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count,CLIWC)的中文版对这些叙事进行分析。采用多变量程序进行统计分析。

结果

认知类词汇最为普遍,平均占22.16%,而感知类词汇(2.86%)最不普遍。女生使用与积极情绪和悲伤相关的词汇比男生多。男生仅在空间类别上超过女生。本研究的主要局限性在于CLIWC无法直接获取上下文文本含义;因此,根据研究主题,可能需要对给定文本进行进一步的定性研究。

结论

为增强学生对患者及其家属所面临的社会心理问题的同理心,应鼓励学生通过识别和表达他们的情感和感知体验来探索心理过程领域。未来研究的研究者应使用自我意识或同理心等结果指标来确定反思性写作的总体效果,以及语言模式的变化如何影响这些结果。

相似文献

3
Reflective student narratives: honing professionalism and empathy.反思性学生叙事:锤炼专业精神与同理心。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan-Mar;3(1):9-15. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.069. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
"Tweet"-Format Writing Is an Effective Tool for Medical Student Reflection.“推文”格式写作是医学生反思的有效工具。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1206-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review.反思和反思实践在健康专业教育中的应用:系统评价。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):595-621. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2. Epub 2007 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验