Wild Steffen, Schulze Heuling Lydia
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 9;15:1459165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1459165. eCollection 2024.
It is of paramount importance to gain an understanding of pro-environmental behavior if we are to successfully tackle the climate crisis. The existing body of research provides evidence that identity influences pro-environmental behavior. However, such research is often over-generalised and researchers are challenged to conduct robust analyses with regard to specific local, cultural and educational factors. The present study aims to investigate whether personal or social identity has a distinct effect on three different dimensions of pro-environmental behavior, using the principles of self-categorisation theory. Additionally, the study seeks to determine whether one of these two factors, the individual or the social factor, is predominant over the other. The study group consisted of cooperative students in Germany, typically a group with high professional ambitions. The data was collected in a cross-sectional survey with a total of 568 cooperative students from academic disciplines in engineering and economics. The reliability of the scales is satisfactory (ω = 0.76-0.88), and the hypotheses are tested by estimating structural equation models. Our research demonstrates that while social identity exerts a stronger influence on activist behavior than personal identity, personal identity has a more pronounced effect on consumer behavior than social identity. Nevertheless, no general statement can be made regarding the relative strength of the effects of personal and social identity on pro-environmental behavior dimensions.
如果我们要成功应对气候危机,了解亲环境行为至关重要。现有研究表明身份认同会影响亲环境行为。然而,此类研究往往过于笼统,研究人员面临着针对特定的当地、文化和教育因素进行有力分析的挑战。本研究旨在运用自我分类理论的原则,探究个人身份或社会身份是否对亲环境行为的三个不同维度有显著影响。此外,该研究还试图确定这两个因素(个人因素或社会因素)中哪一个占主导地位。研究对象为德国的合作学生,他们通常是一群有着很高职业抱负的人。数据是通过对来自工程和经济学科的568名合作学生进行横断面调查收集的。量表的信度令人满意(ω = 0.76 - 0.88),并通过估计结构方程模型来检验假设。我们的研究表明,虽然社会身份对激进主义行为的影响比个人身份更强,但个人身份对消费行为的影响比社会身份更显著。然而,关于个人身份和社会身份对亲环境行为维度影响的相对强度,无法做出一般性陈述。