Nkaizirwa Josephat Paul, Nsanganwimana Florien, Aurah Catherine Musalagani
African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), University of Rwanda, College of Education (UR-CE), 55, Rwamagana, Rwanda.
Department of Educational Psychology and Curriculum Studies, College of Education, The University of Dodoma, 523, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 7;8(3):e09064. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09064. eCollection 2022 Mar.
The role of personal values in understanding pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors has received considerable attention from psychological researchers. However, little is known about the mutual interaction of personal values and the Theory of Ecological Attitudes (2-MEV) in explaining pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs). To explore the mediating factors with which pro-environmental behaviors are explained via environmental attitudes and personal values, this article reports the study findings from secondary school students. Specifically, the article indicates the extent to which a unified model of personal values and the Theory of Ecological Attitudes (2-MEV) explain self-reported PEBs. The cross-cultural validity of the 2-MEV for measuring environmental attitudes (EA) among the selected respondents is as well investigated. A cross-sectional survey of 408 secondary school students was used for data collection. As expected, principal component analysis with a varimax rotation confirmed the two-factor structure of the 2-MEV measuring EA with two uncorrelated factors of Preservation and Utilization. Interestingly, multiple regression analyses indicated that a combined model of personal values and the 2-MEV provides a more explained variance of self-reported PEBs compared to when any of the two predicators is used independently. Overall, altruistic value provides the largest predictive power over egoistic and biospheric values in mediating EA. In turn, the general model that includes personal values and the 2-MEV indicates that Preservation makes the largest and unique contribution in explaining recycling, biodiversity protection, environmental activism, and general PEBs. Conversely, the Utilization factor provides the largest negative explained variance for management of environmental pollution behavior. These findings remain unaltered even when the age of respondents and social desirability responding are statistically controlled. The implications regarding these study findings are discussed.
个人价值观在理解亲环境态度和行为方面的作用已受到心理学研究者的广泛关注。然而,关于个人价值观与生态态度理论(2-MEV)在解释亲环境行为(PEB)方面的相互作用,我们却知之甚少。为了探究通过环境态度和个人价值观来解释亲环境行为的中介因素,本文报告了针对中学生的研究结果。具体而言,本文指出了个人价值观与生态态度理论(2-MEV)的统一模型在解释自我报告的亲环境行为方面的程度。同时,还研究了2-MEV在所选受访者中测量环境态度(EA)的跨文化效度。我们采用对408名中学生的横断面调查来收集数据。正如预期的那样,采用方差最大化旋转的主成分分析证实了2-MEV测量EA的双因素结构,其中包括两个不相关的因素:保护和利用。有趣的是,多元回归分析表明,与单独使用两个预测变量中的任何一个相比,个人价值观与2-MEV的组合模型能更好地解释自我报告的亲环境行为的方差。总体而言,在调节环境态度方面,利他价值观比利己价值观和生物圈价值观具有更大的预测力。反过来,包含个人价值观和2-MEV的一般模型表明,在解释回收利用、生物多样性保护、环境行动主义和一般亲环境行为方面,保护因素的贡献最大且独特。相反,利用因素对环境污染行为管理的负向解释方差最大。即使在对受访者年龄和社会期望回应进行统计控制后,这些发现仍然不变。本文还讨论了这些研究结果的意义。