Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. (Drs. Park and Kim).
Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea. (Dr. Kim).
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00028.
Complete preservation of the splenic vessels is ideal during laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP). However, this remains challenging and time-consuming because the vessels are often deeply embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma. Herein, we introduce our inferior-medial approach to laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (lap-SVPDP) and evaluate its safety and feasibility.
Forty-three patients underwent LSPDP performed by a single surgeon at our institution: 26 (60.5%) lap-SVPDPs with an inferior-medial approach and 17 with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique (lap-WT). We compared the outcomes of the 2 groups. No patient undergoing lap-SVPDP required conversion to laparotomy or lap-WT.
Most preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups; neither the operation time nor the intraoperative blood loss differed despite the greater technical complexity of lap-SVPDP. The mean tumor size was greater in the lap-WT than the lap-SVPDP group (=.001). The splenic vein patency rate of the lap-SVPDP group was not inferior to that of the open SVPDP group treated by the same surgeon.
Inferior-medial approach lap-SVPDP could be a safe and feasible technique for lap-SVPDP; neither blood loss nor operation time is increased.
在腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术(LSPDP)中,理想情况下应完全保留脾脏血管。然而,由于血管常常深埋在胰腺实质中,这仍然具有挑战性且耗时。在此,我们介绍了我们的腹腔镜下脾血管保留胰体尾切除术(lap-SVPDP)的下内侧入路,并评估了其安全性和可行性。
本机构的一位外科医生对 43 名患者进行了 LSPDP 手术:26 例(60.5%)采用下内侧入路的 lap-SVPDP 手术,17 例采用腹腔镜下 Warshaw 技术(lap-WT)。我们比较了两组患者的结局。没有 lap-SVPDP 患者需要转为开腹手术或 lap-WT。
两组患者的大多数术前特征和术后结局均无差异;尽管 lap-SVPDP 技术更为复杂,但手术时间和术中出血量并无差异。lap-WT 组的肿瘤平均大小大于 lap-SVPDP 组(P =.001)。lap-SVPDP 组的脾静脉通畅率并不逊于同一外科医生治疗的开放性 SVPDP 组。
下内侧入路 lap-SVPDP 可能是一种安全且可行的 lap-SVPDP 技术;既不会增加出血量,也不会增加手术时间。