Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜保脾胰体尾切除术的下内侧入路。

Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. (Drs. Park and Kim).

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea. (Dr. Kim).

出版信息

JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00028.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Complete preservation of the splenic vessels is ideal during laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP). However, this remains challenging and time-consuming because the vessels are often deeply embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma. Herein, we introduce our inferior-medial approach to laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy (lap-SVPDP) and evaluate its safety and feasibility.

METHODS

Forty-three patients underwent LSPDP performed by a single surgeon at our institution: 26 (60.5%) lap-SVPDPs with an inferior-medial approach and 17 with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique (lap-WT). We compared the outcomes of the 2 groups. No patient undergoing lap-SVPDP required conversion to laparotomy or lap-WT.

RESULTS

Most preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups; neither the operation time nor the intraoperative blood loss differed despite the greater technical complexity of lap-SVPDP. The mean tumor size was greater in the lap-WT than the lap-SVPDP group (=.001). The splenic vein patency rate of the lap-SVPDP group was not inferior to that of the open SVPDP group treated by the same surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Inferior-medial approach lap-SVPDP could be a safe and feasible technique for lap-SVPDP; neither blood loss nor operation time is increased.

摘要

背景与目的

在腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术(LSPDP)中,理想情况下应完全保留脾脏血管。然而,由于血管常常深埋在胰腺实质中,这仍然具有挑战性且耗时。在此,我们介绍了我们的腹腔镜下脾血管保留胰体尾切除术(lap-SVPDP)的下内侧入路,并评估了其安全性和可行性。

方法

本机构的一位外科医生对 43 名患者进行了 LSPDP 手术:26 例(60.5%)采用下内侧入路的 lap-SVPDP 手术,17 例采用腹腔镜下 Warshaw 技术(lap-WT)。我们比较了两组患者的结局。没有 lap-SVPDP 患者需要转为开腹手术或 lap-WT。

结果

两组患者的大多数术前特征和术后结局均无差异;尽管 lap-SVPDP 技术更为复杂,但手术时间和术中出血量并无差异。lap-WT 组的肿瘤平均大小大于 lap-SVPDP 组(P =.001)。lap-SVPDP 组的脾静脉通畅率并不逊于同一外科医生治疗的开放性 SVPDP 组。

结论

下内侧入路 lap-SVPDP 可能是一种安全且可行的 lap-SVPDP 技术;既不会增加出血量,也不会增加手术时间。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

8
Splenic preservation in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术保脾。
Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):452-462. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10434. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验