Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, South Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2550-2558. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6140-1. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
We have recently performed a blunt dissection technique using LigaSure technology for laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy to reduce the risk of bleeding during the dissection of the splenic vessels. The aim of this study was to compare the utility of the blunt dissection technique and a conventional dissection technique during laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy.
Fifty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy performed by a single surgeon between March 2003 and December 2015 were enrolled in this retrospective single-center study. The patients were divided into the LigaSure group (n = 23) and non-LigaSure group (n = 26). Perioperative clinical outcomes and the postoperative patency of the preserved splenic vessels in the two groups were compared.
The patient and tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the two groups. However, the mean operative time (145 vs. 231.1 min, P = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95.6 vs. 360 ml, P = 0.001), and postoperative hospital stay (6.4 vs. 9.8 days, P = 0.001) were significantly lower in the LigaSure group than in the non-LigaSure group, respectively. The splenic artery patency rate was similar in both groups, but the splenic vein patency was significantly better in the LigaSure group than in the non-LigaSure group (total occlusion rate: 4.5 vs. 30.8%, respectively, P = 0.017).
The results of this study suggest that the blunt dissection technique using a LigaSure reduces the operating time and intraoperative blood loss during laparoscopic spleen- and splenic-vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy and increases the patency of the preserved splenic vessels.
我们最近使用 LigaSure 技术进行了钝性解剖,用于腹腔镜脾和脾血管保留的胰体尾切除术,以降低在脾血管解剖过程中出血的风险。本研究旨在比较钝性解剖技术和传统解剖技术在腹腔镜脾和脾血管保留的胰体尾切除术的应用效果。
本回顾性单中心研究纳入了 2003 年 3 月至 2015 年 12 月间由同一位外科医生进行的腹腔镜脾和脾血管保留的胰体尾切除术的 55 例患者。患者被分为 LigaSure 组(n=23)和非 LigaSure 组(n=26)。比较两组患者的围手术期临床结果和保留的脾血管的术后通畅性。
两组患者的患者和肿瘤特征无显著差异。两组术后并发症发生率相似。然而, LigaSure 组的平均手术时间(145 分钟比 231.1 分钟,P=0.001)、术中出血量(95.6 毫升比 360 毫升,P=0.001)和术后住院时间(6.4 天比 9.8 天,P=0.001)均显著低于非 LigaSure 组。两组脾动脉通畅率相似,但 LigaSure 组脾静脉通畅率明显优于非 LigaSure 组(总闭塞率:4.5%比 30.8%,P=0.017)。
本研究结果表明,使用 LigaSure 的钝性解剖技术可减少腹腔镜脾和脾血管保留的胰体尾切除术的手术时间和术中出血量,并提高保留的脾血管的通畅性。