Suppr超能文献

逆转录实时 PCR 在诊断. 所致侵袭性感染中的应用策略

Reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR in the diagnostic strategy for invasive infections caused by .

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Laboratoire de Parasitologie et Mycologie Médicale, Institut des Agents Infectieux, Lyon, France.

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Nov 13;62(11):e0079124. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00791-24. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

Abstract

The aim was to develop an RT-qPCR targeting and compare its performance to that of qPCR for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Samples from patients of the Lyon University hospitals for whom a suspicion of IA led to the realization of an qPCR molecular diagnostic test over a 2-year period were included. The patients were classified according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC-MSGERC) criteria for suspected IA; RT-qPCR and qPCR assays were performed on all included samples. The sensitivities and specificities of RT-qPCR and qPCR were calculated and compared using the results of the EORTC-MSGERC classification as reference. The cycle threshold (Ct) results were compared according to IA classification and sample type. Among the 193 samples analyzed, 91 were classified as IA excluded, 46 as possible IA, 53 as probable IA, and 3 as proven IA. For all sample types, RT-qPCR was significantly more sensitive than qPCR for all IA classifications with an additional 17/102 samples detected (-value < 0.01). For plasma samples, sensitivity was significantly higher and specificity significantly lower using RT-qPCR for all IA classifications (-value < 0.001). The mean Ct obtained with RT-qPCR were significantly lower than those obtained with qPCR for all IA classifications and all sample types (-value < 0.001 and -value < 0.0001, respectively). RT-qPCR presents a higher sensitivity than qPCR for the diagnosis of IA due to , particularly in samples with an intrinsically low fungal load.IMPORTANCE belongs to the critical priority group of the World Health Organization fungal priority pathogens list. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a life-threatening infection with poor prognosis and challenging diagnosis. PCR has been integrated into the 2020 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group consensus definitions for IA diagnosis. However, due to frequent low fungal burdens, its sensitivity needs to be improved. This work presents an innovative method for detecting total nucleic acids, corresponding to both ribosomal RNA and DNA, that enables IA diagnosis with greater sensitivity than conventional techniques, especially in non-invasive samples such as blood, enhancing the monitoring of this infection in high-risk patients.

摘要

目的是开发一种针对 的 RT-qPCR,并将其性能与 qPCR 进行比较,以用于诊断侵袭性曲霉病 (IA)。本研究纳入了在里昂大学医院就诊的患者的样本,这些患者因疑似 IA 而接受了为期 2 年的 qPCR 分子诊断检测。根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/真菌病研究组 (EORTC-MSGERC) 疑似 IA 的标准对患者进行分类;对所有纳入的样本进行 RT-qPCR 和 qPCR 检测。使用 EORTC-MSGERC 分类的结果作为参考,计算并比较 RT-qPCR 和 qPCR 的灵敏度和特异性。根据 IA 分类和样本类型比较循环阈值 (Ct) 结果。在分析的 193 个样本中,91 个被归类为排除 IA,46 个为可能 IA,53 个为可能 IA,3 个为确诊 IA。对于所有样本类型,RT-qPCR 在所有 IA 分类中均显著优于 qPCR,额外检测到 17/102 个样本(-值<0.01)。对于血浆样本,RT-qPCR 对所有 IA 分类的灵敏度均显著更高,特异性显著更低(-值<0.001)。对于所有 IA 分类和所有样本类型,RT-qPCR 获得的平均 Ct 值均显著低于 qPCR 获得的 Ct 值(-值<0.001 和 -值<0.0001)。RT-qPCR 对 IA 的诊断具有更高的灵敏度,因为 ,尤其是在真菌负荷低的样本中。

重要的是,它属于世界卫生组织真菌优先病原体清单的关键优先组。侵袭性曲霉病 (IA) 是一种危及生命的感染,预后不良且诊断具有挑战性。PCR 已被纳入 2020 年欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/真菌病研究组关于 IA 诊断的共识定义。然而,由于真菌负荷经常较低,其灵敏度需要提高。这项工作提出了一种检测核糖体 RNA 和 DNA 总核酸的创新方法,与传统技术相比,它能够以更高的灵敏度诊断 IA,尤其是在血液等非侵入性样本中,从而增强了对高危患者感染的监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53f1/11559004/bc736ae76d7b/jcm.00791-24.f001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验