Suppr超能文献

口服尼古丁胶丸在 Twitter 上的讨论:内容分析。

Oral Nicotine Gum Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Mar 22;26(4):503-507. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad190.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral nicotine gum such as LUCY, which comes in colorful packaging, mimicking traditional chewing gum, is becoming popular. Many brands of gum have not been approved by the FDA for smoking cessation. This study examined public discourse about, including sentiment toward, oral nicotine gum on Twitter.

METHODS

We used Twitter's Streaming Application Programming Interface to collect data from January 1, 2021, to December 21, 2021, using "nicotine gum" and/or "#nicotinegum" search terms (N = 19 171 unique tweets were collected). We used an inductive approach to become familiar with the data, generated a codebook, and conducted a content analysis on (n = 2152) tweets.

RESULTS

Cessation (n = 716, 33.3%), personal experience (n = 370, 17.2%), and addiction to gum (n = 135, 6.3%) were the most prevalent themes. Cessation tweets primarily discussed cigarette smoking cessation (n = 418, 58.4% of cessation tweets) and successful cessation experiences (n = 155, 21.6%). Other identified themes pertained to using nicotine gum for cognitive enhancement or catching a "buzz" (n = 102, 4.7%), marketing (n = 98, 4.6%), using nicotine gum with other substances (n = 90, 4.2%), and adverse effects (n = 63, 2.9%). Sentiment analysis results revealed that 675 (44.2%) tweets were categorized as neutral, 605 (39.6%) tweets were classified as positive, and 248 tweets (16.2%) were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

About one-third of tweets in our corpus mentioned nicotine gum in the context of smoking cessation. Most nicotine gum-related posts conveyed positive and neutral sentiments. Future studies should consider adding novel nicotine gum-specific search terms as well as exploring other social media platforms to gain more insights about these products.

IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest that Twitter has the potential to track and facilitate conversations between those seeking cigarette cessation advice and those who have successfully quit tobacco by using nicotine gum. Monitoring of promotional content from nicotine gum companies is needed to ensure these products are not appealing to youth and nonusers of tobacco.

摘要

背景

露西(LUCY)等彩色包装的口服尼古丁口香糖模仿传统口香糖,正变得越来越流行。许多品牌的口香糖尚未获得 FDA 批准用于戒烟。本研究考察了 Twitter 上关于口服尼古丁口香糖的公众讨论,包括对此的看法。

方法

我们使用 Twitter 的 Streaming Application Programming Interface 从 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 21 日收集数据,使用“尼古丁口香糖”和/或“#尼古丁口香糖”搜索词(共收集到 19171 条独特的推文)。我们采用归纳法熟悉数据,生成编码本,并对(n=2152)条推文进行内容分析。

结果

戒烟(n=716,33.3%)、个人经验(n=370,17.2%)和对口香糖的依赖(n=135,6.3%)是最常见的主题。戒烟相关的推文主要讨论戒烟(n=418,58.4%的戒烟推文)和成功的戒烟经验(n=155,21.6%)。其他确定的主题涉及使用尼古丁口香糖来提高认知能力或提神(n=102,4.7%)、营销(n=98,4.6%)、与其他物质一起使用尼古丁口香糖(n=90,4.2%)和不良影响(n=63,2.9%)。情感分析结果表明,675 条(44.2%)推文被归类为中性,605 条(39.6%)推文被归类为正面,248 条(16.2%)推文为负面。

结论

我们语料库中约三分之一的推文在戒烟的背景下提到了尼古丁口香糖。大多数与尼古丁口香糖相关的帖子传达了积极和中性的情绪。未来的研究应该考虑添加新的尼古丁口香糖特定搜索词,并探索其他社交媒体平台,以更深入地了解这些产品。

意义

我们的研究结果表明,Twitter 有可能跟踪和促进那些寻求戒烟建议的人与那些成功戒除烟草的人之间的对话,方法是使用尼古丁口香糖。需要监测尼古丁口香糖公司的促销内容,以确保这些产品不会吸引青少年和非烟草使用者。

相似文献

1
Oral Nicotine Gum Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Mar 22;26(4):503-507. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad190.
2
Assessing the public discourse on Twitter: Reactions to the JUUL e-cigarettes ban in the United States.
Tob Induc Dis. 2024 Feb 26;22. doi: 10.18332/tid/184053. eCollection 2024.
3
Ice Flavor-Related Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 30;24(11):e41785. doi: 10.2196/41785.
6
A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter.
Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii26-30. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051551.
7
Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 27;17(10):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4969.
8
Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products.
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 29;15(8):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2534.
9
An Experimental Study of Nicotine Warning Statements in E-cigarette Tweets.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):814-821. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz029.
10
Spanish-Language Tobacco-Related Posts on Twitter: Content Analysis.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 22;26(6):759-763. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad220.

本文引用的文献

1
Use, marketing, and appeal of oral nicotine products among adolescents, young adults, and adults.
Addict Behav. 2023 May;140:107632. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107632. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Ice Flavor-Related Discussions on Twitter: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 30;24(11):e41785. doi: 10.2196/41785.
3
New recreational nicotine lozenges, tablets, gummies and gum proliferate on the US market.
Tob Control. 2024 Apr 19;33(3):414-416. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057673.
4
Adolescent Use of Flavored Non-Tobacco Oral Nicotine Products.
Pediatrics. 2022 Sep 1;150(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-056586.
5
Lucy-Novel Flavored Nicotine Gum, Lozenges, and Pouches: Are They Misleading Consumers?
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(8):1328-1331. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2076881. Epub 2022 May 19.
6
E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Mar 23;31(163). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0215-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.
7
Topics of Nicotine-Related Discussions on Twitter: Infoveillance Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 7;23(6):e25579. doi: 10.2196/25579.
8
Oral nicotine marketing claims in direct-mail advertising.
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(5):663-666. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056446. Epub 2021 May 6.
9
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 29;4(4):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验