• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国社会关怀的数字化及其对老年、无薪照顾者的影响:建构主义主题分析。

The Digitalization of Social Care in England and Implications for Older, Unpaid Carers: Constructionist Thematic Analysis.

机构信息

Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Durham University Business School, Durham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 24;26:e60056. doi: 10.2196/60056.

DOI:10.2196/60056
PMID:39447167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11544341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, populations are aging, generating concerns about the sustainability of health and social care provision. In terms of the public provision of social care in particular, unpaid carers provide much of the support to people with disabilities and older people. In addition, there is an increased onus in many countries on digital transformation projects, in the hope that the digitalization of services can create efficiencies and savings in both costs and care labor. In England, the focus of this paper, the shift to digital services is also framed as a means to enhance choice and control for older unpaid carers, while being part of a broader offering that includes nondigital alternatives and support to mitigate digital exclusion.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the impact of digitalization on older, unpaid carers-a group more likely to be both expected to engage digitally with services and at risk of digital exclusion-in England, focusing on their lived experiences in terms of caring and access to social care.

METHODS

We used a constructionist approach to thematic analysis, where data from 48 older unpaid carers collected through focus groups were analyzed using thematic analysis, resulting in 4 prevailing themes.

RESULTS

Our findings indicated that while unpaid carers largely acknowledge the benefits of digitalization, they also highlight several points of failure, whereby engagement with digital spaces is experienced as coercive and exacerbates feelings of exclusion. These are further worsened by government failures to address issues of connectivity, imposing additional financial burdens and complicating tasks such as benefit applications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have highlighted the need for greater involvement in shaping both policy and technological solutions, which in turn will be more inclusive and aligned to the aspirations and circumstances of older carers.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,人口老龄化问题日益严重,人们对医疗和社会保健服务的可持续性产生了担忧。特别是在公共提供社会关怀方面,无薪护工为残疾人和老年人提供了大部分支持。此外,许多国家都更加重视数字化转型项目,希望通过服务数字化能够提高效率并节省成本和护理劳动力。在本文的研究对象英格兰,向数字服务的转变也被视为增强老年无薪护工选择权和控制权的一种手段,同时也是更广泛服务的一部分,其中包括非数字替代方案和减轻数字排斥的支持。

目的

本研究考察了数字化对老年无薪护工的影响——这一群体更有可能期望与服务进行数字化互动,并且面临数字排斥的风险——在英格兰,重点关注他们在护理和获得社会关怀方面的生活体验。

方法

我们使用了建构主义方法进行主题分析,通过焦点小组收集了 48 名老年无薪护工的数据,并使用主题分析进行了分析,得出了 4 个主要主题。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,尽管无薪护工普遍认识到数字化的好处,但他们也强调了一些失败点,即与数字空间的互动被体验为强制性的,并加剧了排斥感。这些问题因政府未能解决联网问题而进一步恶化,给他们带来了额外的经济负担,并使福利申请等任务变得更加复杂。

结论

在本研究中,我们强调了需要更多地参与塑造政策和技术解决方案,这反过来又将更加包容,并符合老年护工的愿望和情况。

相似文献

1
The Digitalization of Social Care in England and Implications for Older, Unpaid Carers: Constructionist Thematic Analysis.英国社会关怀的数字化及其对老年、无薪照顾者的影响:建构主义主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 24;26:e60056. doi: 10.2196/60056.
2
Types and aspects of support that young carers need and value, and barriers and enablers to access: the REBIAS-YC qualitative study.年轻照顾者需要和重视的支持类型和方面,以及获得支持的障碍和促进因素:REBIAS-YC 定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(36):1-108. doi: 10.3310/ABAT6761.
3
Digital Adoption by an Organization Supporting Informal Caregivers During COVID-19 Pandemic Showing Impact on Service Use, Organizational Performance, and Carers' Well-Being: Retrospective Population-Based Database Study With Embedded User Survey.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,支持非正规护理人员的组织采用数字技术对服务使用、组织绩效和护理人员的幸福感产生影响:基于人群的回顾性数据库研究,嵌入用户调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 13;7:e46414. doi: 10.2196/46414.
4
Unpaid carers of people with dementia and information communication technology: Use, impact and ideas for the future.痴呆症患者的无薪酬照顾者和信息通信技术:使用、影响和未来构想。
Dementia (London). 2024 Jul;23(5):779-799. doi: 10.1177/14713012241249793. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
Do people with dementia and carers get what they need? Barriers in social care and carers needs assessments.痴呆症患者和护理人员是否得到他们所需的?社会护理中的障碍和护理人员需求评估。
Dementia (London). 2024 May;23(4):550-566. doi: 10.1177/14713012241237673. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
6
The high cost of unpaid care by young people:health and economic impacts of providing unpaid care.年轻人无偿护理的高昂成本:提供无偿护理对健康和经济的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):1115. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09166-7.
7
Barriers to accessing and receiving mental health care for paid and unpaid carers of older adults.老年人有薪和无薪照顾者获得和接受精神卫生保健的障碍。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14029. doi: 10.1111/hex.14029.
8
Characteristics of older unpaid carers in England: a study of social patterning from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.英国老年无偿照顾者的特征:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的社会模式研究。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae049.
9
A systematic review of digital access to post-diagnostic health and social care services for dementia.痴呆症患者诊断后获取健康和社会护理服务的数字通道的系统评价。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;39(7):e6119. doi: 10.1002/gps.6119.
10
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.

本文引用的文献

1
Technology in care systems: Displacing, reshaping, reinstating or degrading roles?护理系统中的技术:取代、重塑、恢复还是贬低角色?
New Technol Work Employ. 2022 Mar;37(1):41-58. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12229. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
2
Elderly Forgotten? Digital Exclusion in the Information Age and the Rising Grey Digital Divide.老年人被遗忘了吗?信息时代的数字排斥与不断扩大的灰色数字鸿沟。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221096272. doi: 10.1177/00469580221096272.
3
Power, paradox and pessimism: On the unintended consequences of digital health technologies in primary care.权力、悖论与悲观:初级保健中数字健康技术的意外后果。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114419. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114419. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany.数字自我保健的双刃剑:来自德国北部的医生观点。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Sep;260:113174. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113174. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
5
Bringing the Family in through the Back Door: the Stealthy Expansion of Family Care in Asian and European Long-Term Care Policy.让家庭从后门进入:亚洲和欧洲长期护理政策中家庭护理的悄然扩张
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2017 Sep;32(3):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s10823-017-9325-5.
6
Carers and the digital divide: factors affecting Internet use among carers in the UK.护理人员与数字鸿沟:影响英国护理人员互联网使用的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2005 May;13(3):201-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00547.x.