• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ICD 编码与心脏生物标志物分类的急性冠状动脉综合征住院率之间的一致性的时间趋势:一项基于医院和生物标志物数据的关联研究。

Temporal trends in concordance between ICD-coded and cardiac biomarker-classified hospitalisation rates for acute coronary syndromes: a linked hospital and biomarker data study.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Centre, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2024 Oct 23;11(2):e002995. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002995.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002995
PMID:39448082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499754/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2000, the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) has evolved with reliance on cardiac troponin (cTn) tests. The implications of this change on trends of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes obtained from routinely collected hospital morbidity data are unclear. Using person-linked hospitalisation data, we compared International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded data with biomarker-classified admission rates for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) in Western Australia (WA).

METHODS

We used linked hospitalisation data from all WA tertiary hospitals to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of STEMI, NSTEMI or UA between 2002 and 2016. Linked biomarker results were classified as 'diagnostic' for MI according to established criteria. We calculated age-standardised and sex-standardised rates (ASSRs) for ICD-coded versus biomarker-classified admissions by ACS subtypes and estimated annual change in admissions using Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex.

RESULTS

There were 37 272 ACS admissions in 30 683 patients (64.2% male), and 96% of cases had linked biomarker data, predominantly conventional cTn at the start and high-sensitive cTn from late 2013. Despite lower ASSRs, trends in MI classified with a diagnostic biomarker were concordant with ICD-coded admissions rates for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Between 2002 and 2010, STEMI rates declined by 4.1% (95% CI 5.0%, 3.1%) and 3.4% (95% CI 4.6%, 2.3%) in ICD-coded and biomarker-classified admissions, respectively, and both plateaued thereafter. For NSTEMI between 2002 and 2010, the ICD-coded and biomarker-classified rates increased 8.0% per year (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) and 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%), respectively, and both subsequently declined. For UA, both ICD-coded and biomarker-classified UA admission rates declined in a steady and concordant manner between 2002 and 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the validity of using administrative data to monitor population trends in ACS subtypes as they appear to generally reflect the redefinition of MI in the troponin era.

摘要

背景

自 2000 年以来,心肌梗死 (MI) 的定义已经随着对心脏肌钙蛋白 (cTn) 检测的依赖而演变。这一变化对从常规收集的医院发病率数据中获得的急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS) 亚型趋势的影响尚不清楚。我们使用人员链接的住院数据,比较了国际疾病分类 (ICD) 编码数据与生物标志物分类的西澳大利亚州 (WA) 的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (STEMI)、非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 (NSTEMI) 和不稳定型心绞痛 (UA) 的入院率。

方法

我们使用 WA 所有三级医院的链接住院数据,确定了 2002 年至 2016 年间 STEMI、NSTEMI 或 UA 的主要诊断患者。根据既定标准,将链接的生物标志物结果分类为 MI 的“诊断”。我们按 ACS 亚型计算了 ICD 编码与生物标志物分类入院的年龄标准化和性别标准化率 (ASSR),并使用泊松回归估计了按年龄和性别调整后的年度入院变化。

结果

在 30683 名患者中,有 37272 例 ACS 入院患者(64.2%为男性),96%的患者有链接的生物标志物数据,主要是在开始时使用常规 cTn,从 2013 年底开始使用高敏感 cTn。尽管 ASSR 较低,但具有诊断性生物标志物的 MI 趋势与 STEMI 和 NSTEMI 的 ICD 编码入院率一致。2002 年至 2010 年间,ICD 编码和生物标志物分类入院的 STEMI 发生率分别下降了 4.1%(95%CI 5.0%,3.1%)和 3.4%(95%CI 4.6%,2.3%),此后均趋于平稳。2002 年至 2010 年间,NSTEMI 的 ICD 编码和生物标志物分类入院率分别每年增加 8.0%(95%CI 7.2%,8.9%)和 8.0%(95%CI 7.0%,9.0%),此后均有所下降。对于 UA,2002 年至 2016 年间,ICD 编码和生物标志物分类 UA 入院率以稳定且一致的方式下降。

结论

本研究支持使用行政数据监测 ACS 亚型人群趋势的有效性,因为它们似乎普遍反映了肌钙蛋白时代 MI 的重新定义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c2/11499754/3a2c33a1422c/openhrt-11-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c2/11499754/e679f65802e8/openhrt-11-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c2/11499754/3a2c33a1422c/openhrt-11-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c2/11499754/e679f65802e8/openhrt-11-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c2/11499754/3a2c33a1422c/openhrt-11-2-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in concordance between ICD-coded and cardiac biomarker-classified hospitalisation rates for acute coronary syndromes: a linked hospital and biomarker data study.ICD 编码与心脏生物标志物分类的急性冠状动脉综合征住院率之间的一致性的时间趋势:一项基于医院和生物标志物数据的关联研究。
Open Heart. 2024 Oct 23;11(2):e002995. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002995.
2
Nationwide trends in acute coronary syndrome by subtype in New Zealand 2006-2016.新西兰 2006-2016 年急性冠状动脉综合征亚型的全国趋势。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(3):221-227. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315655. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
3
Epidemiology and risk factors of patients with types of acute coronary syndrome presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡一家三级护理医院收治的不同类型急性冠脉综合征患者的流行病学和危险因素。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1217-x.
4
Validation of ICD-10-AM Coding for Myocardial Infarction Subtype in Hospitalisation Data.验证住院数据中心肌梗死亚型的 ICD-10-AM 编码。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Jun;31(6):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.11.014. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
5
Identification of myocardial infarction type from electronic hospital data in England and Australia: a comparative data linkage study.从英国和澳大利亚的电子医院数据中识别心肌梗死类型:一项比较性数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e019217. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019217.
6
[Acute coronary syndromes in Landspítali 2003-2012].[2003年至2012年冰岛国家大学医院的急性冠状动脉综合征]
Laeknabladid. 2019 Feb;105(2):79-84. doi: 10.17992/lbl.2019.02.217.
7
Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to an urban academic hospital in Soweto, South Africa.南非索韦托市一所城市学术医院收治的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Apr 3;47:160. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.160.37066. eCollection 2024.
8
Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 27;13(8):938-950. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.027. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute coronary syndromes in Germany during the first wave: the COVID-19 collateral damage study.新冠疫情大流行对德国第一波疫情期间急性冠状动脉综合征的影响:COVID-19 附带损害研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Apr;112(4):539-549. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02082-3. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
10
Trends in length of stay following acute coronary syndrome hospitalisation in New Zealand 2006-2016: ANZACS-QI 32 study.2006 - 2016年新西兰急性冠状动脉综合征住院后的住院时间趋势:澳新心血管学会质量指标32研究
N Z Med J. 2020 Jan 17;133(1508):29-42.

本文引用的文献

1
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
2
Validation of ICD-10-AM Coding for Myocardial Infarction Subtype in Hospitalisation Data.验证住院数据中心肌梗死亚型的 ICD-10-AM 编码。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Jun;31(6):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.11.014. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR 胸痛评估与诊断指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001030. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.高敏心肌肌钙蛋白与心肌梗死的通用定义。
Circulation. 2020 Jan 21;141(3):161-171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042960. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
What's new in the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial infarction?心肌梗死第四次全球定义有哪些新内容?
Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 7;39(42):3757-3758. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy655.
6
Exploring the effects of transfers and readmissions on trends in population counts of hospital admissions for coronary heart disease: a Western Australian data linkage study.探索转院和再入院对冠心病住院患者人口计数趋势的影响:一项西澳大利亚数据链接研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 17;7(11):e019226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019226.
7
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays and unstable angina.高敏心肌肌钙蛋白检测与不稳定型心绞痛。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Mar;7(2):120-128. doi: 10.1177/2048872616658591. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
Incidence of acute coronary syndrome in the general Medicare population, 1992 to 2009: a real-world perspective.1992年至2009年普通医疗保险人群中急性冠状动脉综合征的发病率:基于现实世界的视角
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1689-90. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3446.
9
Introduction of high-sensitivity troponin assays: impact on myocardial infarction incidence and prognosis.高敏肌钙蛋白检测的引入:对心肌梗死发生率和预后的影响。
Am J Med. 2012 Dec;125(12):1205-1213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.07.015.
10
Can we monitor heart attack in the troponin era? Evidence from a population-based cohort study.在肌钙蛋白时代,我们能否监测心肌梗死?一项基于人群的队列研究证据。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Jun 24;11:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-35.