• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用患者参与的力量评估一种新型膝骨关节炎支具:一篇共同撰写的评论。

Harnessing the power of patient engagement in evaluating a novel brace for knee osteoarthritis: a co-produced commentary.

作者信息

Bishop Emily L, Bonhomme Justin, Baranec Deb, Wamsley Anita, Ronsky Janet L, Clark Marcia L

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 24;10(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00640-9.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00640-9
PMID:39449106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515838/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient oriented research (POR) invites patients to partner with researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders, incorporating diverse perspectives to generate scientific evidence meaningful to all parties involved. We adopted a POR approach for this study evaluating the feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial of a novel tri-compartment offloader brace for knee osteoarthritis. We involved patients as partners to enhance study design, implementation and interpretation of key outcomes.

APPROACH

Patient involvement consisted of two patient leaders and five patient advisors. Patients participated in 2 virtual focus groups to discuss study outcomes, protocol, results and knowledge translation. Patients were involved in all aspects of the research cycle.

OUTCOMES

Patient feedback resulted in changes to study design, documentation, participant recruitment, data collection, results interpretation and knowledge dissemination, improving the participant experience and aligning study outcomes with patient priorities. Study participants showed a high level of protocol adherence and follow-up rates were excellent. We experienced several unexpected benefits including genuine friendships, a deeper understanding of the patient experience, a more pragmatic approach to clinical research, and leadership opportunities for patients.

RECOMMENDATIONS

We agreed on POR "non-negotiables" to ensure a positive experience for everyone, including creating a safe and comfortable environment, being genuinely receptive to patient feedback, and providing appropriate supports for patients. We strongly recommend that researchers (1) involve patients as early as possible, (2) provide ample and equal opportunities for all patients to be involved, and (3) address system hierarchy by involving patients as equals and fully considering all patient ideas from the beginning of the project.

CONCLUSIONS

While POR is a learning process that is often more challenging than the traditional clinical research approach, the benefits are well worth the additional time and effort required to do it well. Over time, our team experienced a cultural shift and evolution from a top-down research approach to a more inclusive approach considering patient voices as equal to those of researchers. Patient involvement in all aspects of the research process, from question development to results interpretation and dissemination is integral to clinical research advancing equitably.

摘要

引言

以患者为导向的研究(POR)邀请患者与研究人员、临床医生及其他利益相关者合作,纳入不同观点以生成对所有相关方都有意义的科学证据。我们在这项研究中采用了POR方法,评估针对膝骨关节炎的新型三室卸载支具进行随机对照试验的可行性。我们让患者作为合作伙伴参与,以改进研究设计、实施以及关键结果的解读。

方法

患者参与包括两名患者组长和五名患者顾问。患者参加了2次虚拟焦点小组讨论,以探讨研究结果、方案、结果及知识转化。患者参与了研究周期的各个方面。

结果

患者反馈促使研究设计、文件记录、参与者招募、数据收集、结果解读及知识传播发生了改变,改善了参与者体验,并使研究结果与患者优先事项保持一致。研究参与者表现出高度的方案依从性,随访率也很高。我们还获得了一些意想不到的益处,包括真挚的友谊、对患者体验的更深入理解、更务实的临床研究方法以及患者的领导机会。

建议

我们就POR的“不可协商事项”达成一致,以确保每个人都有积极的体验,包括营造安全舒适的环境、真正接受患者反馈以及为患者提供适当支持。我们强烈建议研究人员:(1)尽早让患者参与;(2)为所有患者提供充分和平等的参与机会;(3)通过平等对待患者并从项目一开始就充分考虑所有患者的想法来消除系统层级差异。

结论

虽然POR是一个学习过程,通常比传统临床研究方法更具挑战性,但好处值得投入额外的时间和精力把它做好。随着时间的推移,我们的团队经历了文化转变,从自上而下的研究方法演变为更具包容性的方法,将患者的声音视为与研究人员的声音平等。患者参与研究过程的各个方面,从问题提出到结果解读和传播,对于临床研究公平推进至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/11515838/03b15a4b0d4b/40900_2024_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/11515838/1963b8862f5a/40900_2024_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/11515838/03b15a4b0d4b/40900_2024_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/11515838/1963b8862f5a/40900_2024_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc9b/11515838/03b15a4b0d4b/40900_2024_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Harnessing the power of patient engagement in evaluating a novel brace for knee osteoarthritis: a co-produced commentary.利用患者参与的力量评估一种新型膝骨关节炎支具:一篇共同撰写的评论。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 24;10(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00640-9.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Patient Engagement Partnerships in Clinical Trials: Development of Patient Partner and Investigator Decision Aids.临床试验中的患者参与伙伴关系:患者伙伴和研究者决策辅助工具的开发。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):745-756. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00460-5. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course.加强以患者为导向的研究培训:参与者对一门在线课程的看法
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 6;10(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00629-4.
5
Evaluation of an integrated knowledge translation approach used for updating the Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids: a pre-post mixed methods study.用于更新《Cochrane患者决策辅助工具综述》的综合知识转化方法的评估:一项前后对比的混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00550-w.
6
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
7
Primus Inter PARES: First among equals-practical strategies for young adult PAtient RESearch partners (PARES) by young adult PARES.同辈中的首位:青年成年患者研究伙伴(PARES)的同辈首位实用策略,由青年成年PARES撰写
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 May 8;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00576-0.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
10
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.

本文引用的文献

1
EULAR recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners in rheumatology research: 2023 update.EULAR 关于患者研究伙伴参与风湿病学研究的建议:2023 年更新版。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Oct 21;83(11):1443-1453. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-225566.
2
EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update.EULAR 推荐的髋和膝骨关节炎非药物核心管理:2023 更新。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 May 15;83(6):730-740. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-225041.
3
Patient and Public Involvement Within Orthopaedic Research: A Systematic Review.
患者和公众参与骨科研究:系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):e51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01573.
4
2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee.2019 年美国风湿病学会/关节炎基金会手部、髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎管理指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Feb;72(2):149-162. doi: 10.1002/acr.24131. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Design Evaluation of a Novel Multicompartment Unloader Knee Brace.新型多室减压膝关节支具的设计评估。
J Biomech Eng. 2020 Jan 1;142(1). doi: 10.1115/1.4044818.
6
Supporting the evaluation of public and patient engagement in health system organizations: Results from an implementation research study.支持对卫生系统组织中公众和患者参与的评估:实施研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):1132-1143. doi: 10.1111/hex.12949. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
7
Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about.患者参与:与患者合作开展研究的全部内容。
Thromb Res. 2017 Feb;150:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
8
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.
9
Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ Physical Activity Questionnaires.2001年行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)与国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)的比较。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1584-92. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000229457.73333.9a.
10
Clinical practice. Osteoarthritis of the knee.临床实践。膝关节骨关节炎
N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):841-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp051726.