Suppr超能文献

恢复室患者出院评分系统的比较:叙述性综述

A Comparison among Score Systems for Discharging Patients from Recovery Rooms: A Narrative Review.

作者信息

El Aoufy Khadija, Forciniti Carolina, Longobucco Yari, Lucchini Alberto, Mangli Ilaria, Magi Camilla Elena, Bulleri Enrico, Fusi Cristian, Iovino Paolo, Iozzo Pasquale, Rizzato Nicoletta, Rasero Laura, Bambi Stefano

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 6;14(4):2777-2794. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040205.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The recovery room (RR) is a hospital area where patients are monitored in the early postoperative period before being transferred to the surgical ward or other specialized units. The utilization of scores in the RR context facilitates the assignment of patients to the appropriate ward and directs necessary monitoring. Some scoring systems allow nurses to select patients who can be discharged directly to their homes.

AIM AND METHODS

The aim of this narrative review was to describe and compare the scoring systems employed to discharge postoperative patients from RR, with a focus on item characteristics.

RESULTS

Nine scoring systems were identified and discussed: the "Aldrete Score System" and its modified version, the "Respiration, Energy, Alertness, Circulation, Temperature Score", the "Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System", the "White and Song Score", the "Readiness for Discharge Assessment Tool", the "Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Service Checklist", the "Post-Anesthetic Care Tool", the "Post-operative Quality Recovery Scale", and the "Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition" instrument.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

To obtain a comprehensive overview, the items included in the scoring systems were compared. Despite the availability of guidelines for patients' discharge readiness from the RR, there is no universally recommended scoring system. Next-generation scores must be improved to ease their use, minimize errors, and increase safety. The main goals of the scores included in this narrative review were to be simple to use, feasible, intuitive, comprehensive, and flexible. However, these goals frequently conflict because patient assessment takes time, and a smart and comprehensive score may not consider some clinical parameters that may be crucial for the discharge decision. Therefore, further research should be conducted on this topic.

摘要

引言

恢复室(RR)是医院的一个区域,术后早期患者在此接受监测,之后再被转至外科病房或其他专科病房。在恢复室环境中使用评分有助于将患者分配到合适的病房,并指导必要的监测。一些评分系统能让护士挑选出可直接出院回家的患者。

目的与方法

本叙述性综述的目的是描述和比较用于让术后患者从恢复室出院的评分系统,重点关注项目特征。

结果

共识别并讨论了九种评分系统:“Aldrete评分系统”及其修订版、“呼吸、能量、意识、循环、体温评分”、“麻醉后出院评分系统”、“怀特和宋评分”、“出院准备评估工具”、“麻醉与围手术期医学服务检查表”、“麻醉后护理工具”、“术后质量恢复量表”以及“辨别麻醉后过渡准备情况”工具。

讨论与结论

为获得全面概述,对评分系统中包含的项目进行了比较。尽管有关于患者从恢复室出院准备情况的指南,但尚无普遍推荐的评分系统。下一代评分必须改进,以方便使用、减少错误并提高安全性。本叙述性综述中包含的评分的主要目标是使用简单、可行、直观、全面且灵活。然而,这些目标常常相互冲突,因为患者评估需要时间,而一个精巧且全面的评分可能未考虑到一些对出院决策可能至关重要的临床参数。因此,应对该主题开展进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b289/11503295/08072cbca994/nursrep-14-00205-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验