Varela-Olalla Daniel, Del Campo-Vecino Juan, Balsalobre-Fernández Carlos
Applied Biomechanics and Sports Technology Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Oct 5;9(4):186. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040186.
This study investigated the differences in acute fatigue following resistance training performed with low versus high loads in the bench press (BP). Trained males (n = 5, 21.2 ± 2.77 years; 81.86 ± 6.67 kg; 177 ± 7.52 cm) undertook three protocols with 50%RM and three with 85%RM with volume equalized between protocols: muscular failure protocols (TF, RTP1 and 2), half-maximum repetition protocols (RTP3 and 4), and cluster set protocols (RTP5 and 6). Mechanical performance, lactate, and perceptual responses were analyzed during protocols and at post 0, 24, and 48 h using frequentist ( < 0.05) and Bayesian approaches. Moderate to large (ES ≥ 0.3) and trivial to moderate (ES < 0.3) effects were observed at 0 and 24 h post-session, respectively, across all protocols. TF protocols, particularly RTP1, showed the greatest impairments when compared to the other RTP (ES ≥ 0.3). The Bayesian analysis supported the frequentist results, showing strong-decisive evidence for our data under the model that included protocols as predictors for mechanical, metabolic, and perceptual variables during protocols. Inter-individual variability in responses was observed in the neuromuscular tests, potentially related to the strength level and perceptual responses. In summary, TF generates greater fatigue, while reducing set volume to half of maximum repetitions or including intra-set rest that helps to mitigate fatigue symptoms.
本研究调查了在卧推(BP)中使用低负荷与高负荷进行抗阻训练后急性疲劳的差异。训练有素的男性(n = 5,年龄21.2±2.77岁;体重81.86±6.67千克;身高177±7.52厘米)进行了三个50%RM的训练方案和三个85%RM的训练方案,各方案间训练量相等:肌肉疲劳训练方案(TF、RTP1和2)、半最大重复次数训练方案(RTP3和4)以及成组训练方案(RTP5和6)。在训练过程中以及训练后0、24和48小时,使用频率学派方法(<0.05)和贝叶斯方法分析力学性能、乳酸和感知反应。在所有训练方案中,训练后0小时和24小时分别观察到中度至较大(ES≥0.3)和轻微至中度(ES<0.3)的效应。与其他RTP相比,TF训练方案,尤其是RTP1,表现出最大的损伤(ES≥0.3)。贝叶斯分析支持了频率学派的结果,表明在将训练方案作为训练期间力学、代谢和感知变量预测指标的模型下,我们的数据有强有力的决定性证据。在神经肌肉测试中观察到个体反应的变异性,这可能与力量水平和感知反应有关。总之,TF会产生更大的疲劳,同时将训练量减少至最大重复次数的一半或纳入组内休息有助于减轻疲劳症状。