Rockhill Karilynn M, Bau Gabrielle E, DeVeaugh-Geiss Angela, Chilcoat Howard, Dart Richard, Iwanicki Janetta, Black Joshua C
Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Safety, Denver Health & Hospital Authority Denver Colorado USA.
Indivior, Inc. North Chesterfield Virginia USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Oct 23;5(5):e13338. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13338. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Opioid overdose survivors present to emergency departments (EDs) and many EDs have developed programs to initiate buprenorphine. The impact of the increasing use of buprenorphine in ED and by other providers is unknown while opioid mortality continues to rise. Public mortality data do not distinguish buprenorphine from other prescription opioids. Our objective was to determine when changes in overdose mortality trends occurred comparing deaths involving buprenorphine to oxycodone, hydrocodone, and methadone.
This observational study utilized the drug-involved mortality database including US death certificates (2010‒2017) in which buprenorphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone, or methadone were contributing causes of death (determined through textual analysis). Population- and drug utilization-adjusted mortality rates were examined using disjointed linear regression. Buprenorphine-involved deaths were stratified by polysubstance involvement.
The population-adjusted mortality rates for buprenorphine-involved deaths were lowest compared to other opioids; however, the change in rate for buprenorphine increased faster than oxycodone, hydrocodone, and methadone at 8.9% each quarter-year (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.0, 9.8) from 2010 to mid-2016 when it stabilized. After adjusting for changes in dispensing over the study period, buprenorphine-involved mortality rates were increasing at 5.3% (95% CI: 4.6, 6.1) each quarter-year. In 2017, 94% buprenorphine-involved deaths had at least one other drug contributing to the cause of death.
Given the low mortality, high proportions of polysubstance mortality, and the mixed agonist/antagonist mechanism of action, use of buprenorphine alone likely presents a lower risk for overdose than comparators. Mortality rose faster than dispensing, signaling need to ensure people understand buprenorphine risks, particularly polysubstance use, balanced against importance for treating opioid use disorders.
阿片类药物过量幸存者会前往急诊科就诊,许多急诊科已制定了启动丁丙诺啡治疗的方案。在阿片类药物死亡率持续上升的情况下,急诊科及其他医疗服务提供者对丁丙诺啡使用的增加所产生的影响尚不清楚。公共死亡率数据无法区分丁丙诺啡与其他处方阿片类药物。我们的目的是通过比较涉及丁丙诺啡与羟考酮、氢可酮和美沙酮的死亡情况,来确定过量死亡率趋势的变化时间。
这项观察性研究利用了涉及药物的死亡率数据库,其中包括美国死亡证明(2010 - 2017年),在这些死亡证明中,丁丙诺啡、羟考酮、氢可酮或美沙酮是导致死亡的原因(通过文本分析确定)。使用间断线性回归分析经人口和药物使用调整后的死亡率。涉及丁丙诺啡的死亡按多药使用情况进行分层。
与其他阿片类药物相比,涉及丁丙诺啡的死亡经人口调整后的死亡率最低;然而,2010年至2016年年中丁丙诺啡死亡率的变化速度比羟考酮、氢可酮和美沙酮更快,每季度增长8.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:8.0,9.8),之后趋于稳定。在对研究期间的配药变化进行调整后,涉及丁丙诺啡的死亡率每季度增长5.3%(95%CI:4.6,6.1)。2017年,94%涉及丁丙诺啡的死亡至少有另一种药物导致死亡。
鉴于死亡率较低、多药导致死亡的比例较高以及混合激动剂/拮抗剂的作用机制,单独使用丁丙诺啡可能比其他药物导致过量的风险更低。死亡率上升速度快于配药速度,这表明需要确保人们了解丁丙诺啡的风险,特别是多药使用风险,同时要权衡其在治疗阿片类药物使用障碍方面的重要性。