• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线对话监测以了解阿片类药物流行情况: 流行病学监测研究。

Online Conversation Monitoring to Understand the Opioid Epidemic: Epidemiological Surveillance Study.

机构信息

Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety, Denver, CO, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jun 29;6(2):e17073. doi: 10.2196/17073.

DOI:10.2196/17073
PMID:32597786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7367521/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Between 2016 and 2017, the national mortality rate involving opioids continued its escalation; opioid deaths rose from 42,249 to 47,600, bringing the public health crisis to a new height. Considering that 69% of adults in the United States use online social media sites, a resource that builds a more complete understanding of prescription drug misuse and abuse could supplement traditional surveillance instruments. The Food and Drug Administration has identified 5 key risks and consequences of opioid drugs-misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose, and death. Identifying posts that discuss these key risks could lead to novel information that is not typically captured by traditional surveillance systems.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to describe the trends of online posts (frequency over time) involving abuse, misuse, addiction, overdose, and death in the United States and to describe the types of websites that host these discussions. Internet posts that mentioned fentanyl, hydrocodone, oxycodone, or oxymorphone were examined.

METHODS

Posts that did not refer to personal experiences were removed, after which 3.1 million posts remained. A stratified sample of 61,000 was selected. Unstructured data were classified into 5 key risks by manually coding for key outcomes of misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose, and death. Sampling probabilities of the coded posts were used to estimate the total post volume for each key risk.

RESULTS

Addiction and misuse were the two most commonly discussed key risks for hydrocodone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone. For fentanyl, overdose and death were the most discussed key risks. Fentanyl had the highest estimated number of misuse-, overdose-, and death-related mentions (41,808, 42,659, and 94,169, respectively). Oxycodone had the highest estimated number of abuse- and addiction-related mentions (3548 and 12,679, respectively). The estimated volume of online posts for fentanyl increased by more than 10-fold in late 2017 and 2018. The odds of discussing fentanyl overdose (odds ratios [OR] 4.32, 95% CI 2.43-7.66) and death (OR 5.05, 95% CI 3.10-8.21) were higher for social media, while the odds of discussing fentanyl abuse (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.22) and addiction (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.38) were higher for blogs and forums.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 5 FDA-defined key risks, fentanyl overdose and death has dominated discussion in recent years, while discussion of oxycodone, hydrocodone, and oxymorphone has decreased. As drug-related deaths continue to increase, an understanding of the motivations, circumstances, and consequences of drug abuse would assist in developing policy responses. Furthermore, content was notably different based on media origin, and studies that exclusively use either social media sites (such as Twitter) or blogs and forums could miss important content. This study sets out sustainable, ongoing methodology for surveilling internet postings regarding these drugs.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/2795afe13242/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/2ce4eba2d19f/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/0eeb8e676424/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/886018dfb6d1/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/acec9cc0d2dc/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/c4c446b2f3c5/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/2795afe13242/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/2ce4eba2d19f/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/0eeb8e676424/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/886018dfb6d1/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/acec9cc0d2dc/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/c4c446b2f3c5/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b3/7367521/2795afe13242/publichealth_v6i2e17073_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

2016 年至 2017 年期间,涉及阿片类药物的全国死亡率继续上升;阿片类药物死亡人数从 42249 人上升至 47600 人,使公共卫生危机达到新的高度。考虑到美国 69%的成年人使用在线社交媒体网站,一种可以更全面地了解处方药物滥用的资源可以补充传统的监测工具。美国食品和药物管理局已经确定了阿片类药物的 5 个关键风险和后果——误用、滥用、成瘾、过量用药和死亡。确定讨论这些关键风险的帖子可以提供通常不会被传统监测系统捕捉到的新信息。

目的

本研究的目的是描述美国涉及滥用、误用、成瘾、过量用药和死亡的在线帖子(随时间的频率)的趋势,并描述承载这些讨论的网站类型。研究人员检查了提到芬太尼、氢可酮、羟考酮或羟吗啡酮的帖子。

方法

删除未提及个人经历的帖子后,剩余 310 万条帖子。选择了 61000 个分层样本。通过人工编码关键结果(误用、滥用、成瘾、过量用药和死亡),将非结构化数据分类为 5 个关键风险。编码帖子的抽样概率用于估计每个关键风险的总帖子量。

结果

在氢可酮、羟考酮和羟吗啡酮方面,成瘾和误用是讨论最多的两个关键风险。对于芬太尼,过量用药和死亡是讨论最多的关键风险。芬太尼的误用、过量用药和死亡相关提及量估计最高(分别为 41808、42659 和 94169)。羟考酮的滥用和成瘾相关提及量估计最高(分别为 3548 和 12679)。2017 年末和 2018 年,芬太尼的在线帖子数量增加了 10 多倍。社交媒体上讨论芬太尼过量用药(比值比[OR]4.32,95%CI 2.43-7.66)和死亡(OR 5.05,95%CI 3.10-8.21)的可能性更高,而社交媒体上讨论芬太尼滥用(OR 0.10,95%CI 0.04-0.22)和成瘾(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.15-0.38)的可能性更高。

结论

在 FDA 定义的 5 个关键风险中,芬太尼的过量用药和死亡在近年来占据了主导地位,而对羟考酮、氢可酮和羟吗啡酮的讨论则有所减少。随着与药物相关的死亡人数继续增加,了解药物滥用的动机、情况和后果将有助于制定政策应对措施。此外,内容根据媒体来源明显不同,仅使用社交媒体网站(如 Twitter)或博客和论坛的研究可能会错过重要内容。本研究提出了一种可持续的、持续的方法来监测与这些药物有关的互联网帖子。

相似文献

1
Online Conversation Monitoring to Understand the Opioid Epidemic: Epidemiological Surveillance Study.在线对话监测以了解阿片类药物流行情况: 流行病学监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jun 29;6(2):e17073. doi: 10.2196/17073.
2
Florida Controlled Substance Prescribing佛罗里达州受管制物质处方开具
3
NP Safe Prescribing of Controlled Substances While Avoiding Drug Diversion安全开具管制药品处方,同时避免药物转移
4
Changes in drug use patterns reported on the web after the introduction of ADF OxyContin: findings from the Researched Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) System Web Monitoring Program.阿片类药物复方制剂奥施康定引入后网络上报告的药物使用模式变化:来自药物滥用、转移和成瘾相关监测(RADARS)系统网络监测项目的研究结果
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):1044-1052. doi: 10.1002/pds.4248. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
5
Responsible Controlled Substance and Opioid Prescribing负责任的管制药品和阿片类药物处方开具
6
How Motivations for Using Buprenorphine Products Differ From Using Opioid Analgesics: Evidence from an Observational Study of Internet Discussions Among Recreational Users.使用丁丙诺啡产品的动机与使用阿片类镇痛药的动机有何不同:来自娱乐性使用者互联网讨论的观察性研究证据。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 25;6(1):e16038. doi: 10.2196/16038.
7
Monitoring of internet forums to evaluate reactions to the introduction of reformulated OxyContin to deter abuse.监测互联网论坛,以评估对重新配方的奥施康定引入以遏制滥用的反应。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 May 2;16(5):e119. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3397.
8
Web-Based Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study.基于网络的讨论以及在澳大利亚非法街头贩卖他喷他多和羟考酮:流行病学监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 20;7(12):e29187. doi: 10.2196/29187.
9
Comparing the effects of decreasing prescription opioid shipments and the release of an abuse deterrent OxyContin formulation on opioid overdose fatalities in WV: an interrupted time series study.比较减少处方类阿片药物发货量和发布一种滥用威慑型羟考酮配方对 WV 地区阿片类药物过量死亡的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2024 Jan 4;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00587-2.
10
Using Social Media to Examine Themes Surrounding Fentanyl Misuse and Risk Indicators.利用社交媒体研究芬太尼滥用和风险指标相关主题。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(7):920-929. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2196574. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacovigilance in the digital age: gaining insight from social media data.数字时代的药物警戒:从社交媒体数据中获取见解
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2025 May 27;250:10555. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2025.10555. eCollection 2025.
2
Which social media platforms facilitate monitoring the opioid crisis?哪些社交媒体平台有助于监测阿片类药物危机?
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 28;4(4):e0000842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000842. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References on X (Formerly Twitter): Neural Network Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017.药物和阿片类药物滥用相关的过量死亡-美国,2013-2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 4;67(5152):1419-1427. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm675152e1.
2
Changes in drug use patterns reported on the web after the introduction of ADF OxyContin: findings from the Researched Abuse, Diversion, and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) System Web Monitoring Program.阿片类药物复方制剂奥施康定引入后网络上报告的药物使用模式变化:来自药物滥用、转移和成瘾相关监测(RADARS)系统网络监测项目的研究结果
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):1044-1052. doi: 10.1002/pds.4248. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
X(前身为 Twitter)上处方药引用的数字流行病学:神经网络主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 23;26:e57885. doi: 10.2196/57885.
4
Insights from the Twittersphere: a cross-sectional study of public perceptions, usage patterns, and geographical differences of tweets discussing cocaine.来自推特圈的见解:一项关于讨论可卡因的推文的公众认知、使用模式及地域差异的横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 19;15:1282026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1282026. eCollection 2024.
5
Understanding Public Perceptions and Discussions on Opioids Through Twitter: Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study.通过 Twitter 了解公众对阿片类药物的看法和讨论:跨-sectional Infodemiology 研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 31;25:e50013. doi: 10.2196/50013.
6
Web-Based Discussion and Illicit Street Sales of Tapentadol and Oxycodone in Australia: Epidemiological Surveillance Study.基于网络的讨论以及在澳大利亚非法街头贩卖他喷他多和羟考酮:流行病学监测研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 20;7(12):e29187. doi: 10.2196/29187.
7
Patterns of Routes of Administration and Drug Tampering for Nonmedical Opioid Consumption: Data Mining and Content Analysis of Reddit Discussions.非医疗阿片类药物消费的给药途径和药物篡改模式:Reddit 讨论的数据分析和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 4;23(1):e21212. doi: 10.2196/21212.
Systematic review of surveillance by social media platforms for illicit drug use.
社交媒体平台监测非法药物使用的系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Dec 1;39(4):763-776. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx020.
4
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016.美国 2016 年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
5
Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014.药物和阿片类药物过量死亡人数增加 - 美国,2000-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jan 1;64(50-51):1378-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3.
6
Prescription Opioid Misuse, Abuse, Morbidity, and Mortality: Balancing Effective Pain Management and Safety.处方阿片类药物的误用、滥用、发病率和死亡率:平衡有效的疼痛管理与安全性
Pain Med. 2015 Oct;16 Suppl 1:S3-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12904. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
"Time for dabs": Analyzing Twitter data on marijuana concentrates across the U.S.“涂抹大麻浓缩物的时间”:分析美国各地关于大麻浓缩物的推特数据
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Oct 1;155:307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.07.1199. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
8
Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis.慢性疼痛中阿片类药物滥用、误用及成瘾率:一项系统评价与数据综合分析
Pain. 2015 Apr;156(4):569-576. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460357.01998.f1.
9
Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the United States.美国阿片类镇痛药滥用和死亡率的趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 15;372(3):241-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1406143.
10
Using textual cause-of-death data to study drug poisoning deaths.利用文本死因数据研究药物中毒死亡。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 1;179(7):884-94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt333. Epub 2014 Feb 11.