• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对职业健康工作人员和未确诊工人的健康检查后续检查的基于助推的通知评估:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of Nudge-Based Notification for Follow-Up Examinations in Health Check-Ups Targeting Occupational Health Staff and Undiagnosed Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Takebayashi Masaki, Mizota Yuri, Namba Mira, Kaneda Yudai, Takebayashi Kurenai, Shibutani Hirohide, Koyama Tatsuya

机构信息

Sociology, Aomori University, Aomori, JPN.

Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70032. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70032
PMID:39449904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499217/
Abstract

Purpose Follow-up examinations after health check-ups are important for early detection of noncommunicable diseases among workers. Nudging can serve as an effective intervention for individuals who avoid follow-up examinations due to cognitive biases. This study aims to evaluate the interest in nudge-based notification for follow-up examinations, targeting occupational health staff and undiagnosed workers in a randomized controlled trial. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (receiving a text-based notification without nudges) or a nudge group (receiving a notification that modified the control group based on Easy-type nudges). An anonymous web survey was administered. Results Occupational health staff (n = 425) rated all items significantly higher, including "willingness to use the notification" which scored 2.22 for the control group vs. 3.62 for the nudge group on a 1- to 5-point scale (P < 0.001). Among undiagnosed workers (n = 871), there was no significant difference in "willingness to apply for the follow-up examinations" (3.01 vs. 3.09; P = 0.272), but all other items were rated significantly higher in the nudge group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Based on these findings, we suggest that occupational health staff should use nudge-based notifications. However, increasing the willingness of undiagnosed workers to undergo follow-up examinations remains challenging. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to incorporate multiple nudge elements into notifications.

摘要

目的 健康检查后的随访对于早期发现工人中的非传染性疾病很重要。推动可作为一种有效的干预措施,针对因认知偏差而避免随访的个体。本研究旨在通过一项随机对照试验,评估职业健康工作人员和未确诊工人对基于推动的随访检查通知的兴趣。方法 将参与者随机分为对照组(接收无推动的基于文本的通知)或推动组(接收基于简易型推动对对照组进行修改的通知)。进行了一项匿名网络调查。结果 职业健康工作人员(n = 425)对所有项目的评分均显著更高,包括“使用通知的意愿”,在1至5分的量表上,对照组得分为2.22,推动组得分为3.62(P < 0.001)。在未确诊工人(n = 871)中,“申请随访检查的意愿”没有显著差异(3.01对3.09;P = 0.272),但推动组在所有其他项目上的评分均显著更高(P < 0.05)。结论 根据这些发现,我们建议职业健康工作人员应使用基于推动的通知。然而,提高未确诊工人接受随访检查的意愿仍然具有挑战性。为实现这一目标,有必要在通知中纳入多种推动元素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/5dfbf206745f/cureus-0016-00000070032-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/7a73ad7114dd/cureus-0016-00000070032-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/be6393a89864/cureus-0016-00000070032-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/5dfbf206745f/cureus-0016-00000070032-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/7a73ad7114dd/cureus-0016-00000070032-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/be6393a89864/cureus-0016-00000070032-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f257/11499217/5dfbf206745f/cureus-0016-00000070032-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Nudge-Based Notification for Follow-Up Examinations in Health Check-Ups Targeting Occupational Health Staff and Undiagnosed Workers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.针对职业健康工作人员和未确诊工人的健康检查后续检查的基于助推的通知评估:一项随机对照试验。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 23;16(9):e70032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Enhancing Interest in Smoking Cessation Programs With Nudge-Incorporated Flyers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Occupational Health Staff and Workers in Japan.使用融入助推策略的传单提高戒烟项目的参与度:日本职业健康工作人员和工人的一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64756. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64756. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Nudging health care workers towards a flu shot: reminders are accepted but not necessarily effective. A randomized controlled study among residents in general practice in France.推动医护人员接种流感疫苗:提醒虽被接受,但不一定有效。法国普通科医生中进行的一项随机对照研究。
Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 28;38(4):410-415. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab001.
4
Validation of the most cost-effective nudge to promote workers' regular self-weighing: a cluster randomized controlled trial.验证最具成本效益的推动工人定期自我称重的干预措施:一项群组随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 15;12(1):15501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18916-z.
5
A national nudge study of differently framed messages to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Saudi Arabia: A randomized controlled trial.一项关于不同框架信息以提高沙特阿拉伯COVID-19疫苗接种率的全国性助推研究:一项随机对照试验。
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Sep;31(9):101748. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101748. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
6
Rationale and design of NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC and NUDGE-FLU-2: Two nationwide randomized trials of electronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination among patients with chronic diseases and older adults during the 2023/2024 influenza season.NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC 和 NUDGE-FLU-2 的原理和设计:在 2023/2024 流感季,针对慢性病患者和老年人开展的两项全国范围内的随机试验,旨在通过电子提示来提高流感疫苗接种率。
Am Heart J. 2024 Jun;272:23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
7
Clinician- and Patient-Directed Communication Strategies for Patients With Cancer at High Mortality Risk: A Cluster Randomized Trial.面向高死亡风险癌症患者的临床医生和患者导向的沟通策略:一项集群随机试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418639. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18639.
8
You can't nudge into vaccination: Comparing the effects of nudge types and Covid-19 vaccination attitudes on vaccine willingness.你无法推动接种疫苗:比较推动类型和新冠疫苗接种态度对疫苗接种意愿的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Jul 27:13591053241264932. doi: 10.1177/13591053241264932.
9
Who accepts nudges? nudge acceptability from a self-regulation perspective.谁接受助推?从自我调节的角度看助推的可接受性。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 3;16(12):e0260531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260531. eCollection 2021.
10
Improving cardiometabolic health through nudging dietary behaviours and physical activity in low SES adults: design of the Supreme Nudge project.通过推动社会经济地位较低的成年人的饮食行为和身体活动来改善心血管代谢健康:Supreme Nudge 项目的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5839-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Interest in Smoking Cessation Programs With Nudge-Incorporated Flyers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Occupational Health Staff and Workers in Japan.使用融入助推策略的传单提高戒烟项目的参与度:日本职业健康工作人员和工人的一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64756. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64756. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Japan's Demographic Dilemma: Navigating the Postpandemic Population Decline.日本的人口困境:应对疫情后人口下降问题
JMA J. 2024 Jul 16;7(3):403-405. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0010. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Check-ups in 2021 and 2022: A Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Healthcare Facilities in Japan Society of Ningen Dock.
2021年和2022年新冠疫情对健康检查的影响:日本国民健康体检协会对医疗机构的全国性跟踪调查
JMA J. 2024 Jan 15;7(1):94-105. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2023-0126. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
4
Exploring the labour market outcomes of the risk factors for non-communicable diseases: A systematic review.探索非传染性疾病风险因素的劳动力市场结果:一项系统综述。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Nov 24;25:101564. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101564. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Validation of the most cost-effective nudge to promote workers' regular self-weighing: a cluster randomized controlled trial.验证最具成本效益的推动工人定期自我称重的干预措施:一项群组随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 15;12(1):15501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18916-z.
6
Nudging in Public Health Lifestyle Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review and Metasynthesis.公共卫生生活方式干预中的推动因素:系统文献回顾和元综合。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Oct;47(5):749-764. doi: 10.1177/1090198120931788. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
7
Present bias and health.当前偏差与健康。
J Risk Uncertain. 2018 Oct;57(2):177-198. doi: 10.1007/s11166-018-9289-z. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review.我们对谁参加和不参加一般健康检查了解多少?叙事范围综述的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 31;12:723. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-723.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:报告平行组随机试验的更新指南》
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):100-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72352.
10
Do adults who believe in periodic health examinations receive more clinical preventive services?相信定期健康检查的成年人会接受更多的临床预防服务吗?
Prev Med. 2007 Oct;45(4):282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Jun 2.