King Samuel W, Abouharb Alexander, Doggett Thomas, Taufiqurrakhman Mohamad, Palan Jeya, Freear Bulut, Pandit Hemant, van Duren Bernard H
Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St. James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;11(10):1049. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11101049.
Early diagnosis and treatment of surgical wound infection can be challenging. This is especially relevant in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: early detection is key to success and reducing morbidity, mortality and resource use. 'Smart' dressings have been developed to detect parameters suggestive of infection. This scoping review investigates the current status of the field, limited to devices tested in animal models and/or humans, with a focus on their application to arthroplasty. The literature was searched using MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases from 2000 to 2023. Original articles assessing external sensing methods for the detection of wound infection in animal models or human participants were included. Sixteen articles were eligible. The results were broadly divided by sensing method: colorimetric, electrochemical and fluorescence/photothermal responses. Six of the devices detected more than one parameter (multimodal), while the rest were unimodal. The most common parameters examined were temperature and pH. Most 'smart' dressings focused on diagnosing infection in chronic wounds, and none were tested in humans with wound infections. There is limited late-stage research into using dressing sensors to diagnose wound infection in post-surgical patients. Future research should explore this to enable inpatient and remote outpatient monitoring of post-operative wounds to detect wound infection.
手术伤口感染的早期诊断和治疗可能具有挑战性。这在人工关节周围感染的管理中尤为重要:早期检测是成功以及降低发病率、死亡率和资源使用的关键。已开发出“智能”敷料来检测提示感染的参数。本综述调查了该领域的现状,仅限于在动物模型和/或人体中进行测试的设备,重点是它们在关节置换术中的应用。使用MEDLINE/PubMed和Embase数据库检索了2000年至2023年的文献。纳入了评估在动物模型或人类参与者中检测伤口感染的外部传感方法的原始文章。有16篇文章符合条件。结果大致按传感方法分为:比色法、电化学法和荧光/光热响应法。其中6种设备检测了不止一个参数(多模态),其余为单模态。检测的最常见参数是温度和pH值。大多数“智能”敷料专注于诊断慢性伤口感染,且没有一种在有伤口感染的人类身上进行过测试。关于使用敷料传感器诊断术后患者伤口感染的后期研究有限。未来的研究应探索这一点,以便对术后伤口进行住院患者和远程门诊监测,以检测伤口感染。